The clintons are mediocre, banal characters, a big yawn but for their scandals. |
the logic of pathologic self-interest
|
|
"No one put all the pieces together." Past Holds Little Explanation for The Meteoric Fall Of Jayson Blair |
My question for Pinch (him, he's dreaming) Sulzberger: Mr. Sulzberger... Shortly after 9/11, you admitted to Brian Lamb (C-SPAN, Washington Journal, 11.30.01) that The Times' endorsement of clinton was based on clinton "policies, not achievements."
|
CNNs of Commission, Rapist Demagogues and 9/11
the movie |
Democratic Party's Problem Transcends Its Anti-War Contingent
Here's my question Mia. In New York, can a sitting US senator run for president, lose, and keep her senate seat?
If the answer is "yes", I fully expect Hillary to be 'drafted' in 2004, and with Bill Clinton touting Wesley Clark just this week-end, as presidential material, it's possible Hillary could choose Clark as her running mate. Besides satisfying the military expertise issue, it re-connects Hillary to Arkansas, and satisfies presidential candidate geographics too. Besides, I don't think Democrats would run two sitting senators for P and VP.
1. Hillary is the only candidate who could satisfy democrat middle grounders, and both lunatic wings of the party.
2. Losing to Bush in 2004 wouldn't tarnish her image one bit, in fact, with a presidential run under her belt, she would be considered even stronger for 2008.