Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

28 DAYS LATER ..... Any comments?
rotten tomatoes villlage voice ^ | June Late 2003 | Michael Atkinson

Posted on 06/27/2003 4:48:52 PM PDT by dennisw

http://www.rottentomatoes.com/click/movie-1123236/reviews.php?critic=columns&sortby=default&page=1&rid=1168298

To every creatively frozen, summer-movie ice age comes a little heat lightning, and these gray dog days it's Danny Boyle's 28 Days Later. On one hand a seat-o'-pants digital-video quickie designed for blunt trauma, and on the other a veritable index of classic genre-stuff, Boyle's film creates an acute sense of movie-viewing danger. You're never sure that what you'll see will be completely safe and blockbustery. Because it's cut-rate, star-free (supporting players Brendan Gleeson and Christopher Eccleston are as close to marquee names as it gets), outlandishly edge-conscious, and 100 percent British, the movie has a frontier charge built in. It's no landmark—it's too derivative and, finally, tasteful—but unassuming ticket buyers may be spot-welded to their seats with an unfamiliar intensity.

Screenwriter Alex Garland literally drops in the name of the film as an intertitle following a disastrous animal lab liberation in which eco-activists release virally infected chimps into the world. Four weeks later, naked nobody Jim (Cillian Murphy) wakes up in a hospital to find London an empty maze of post-apocalyptic silence, wreckage, and broodingly useless landmarks. It doesn't take long for him to stumble upon a dozing mob of the "infected"—essentially, George Romero-style cannibal zombies, distinguished by their red contact lenses, body-snatcher screech, and rigor-mortis-free speed—or to be rescued by Mark and Selena (Noah Huntley and the redoubtable Naomie Harris), a pair of no-nonsense vigilante humans brimming with exposition.

England, it seems, has been wholly evacuated; exactly how far beyond its shores the plague spread is a matter of conflicting rumor. It hardly matters—the scenario quickly boils down to Dawn of the Dead hack-or-be-chomped. The jittery social collapse in Night of the Living Dead, Romero's first Dead film, is conveniently hopscotched, but even so, that seminal nightmare's upcoming teen re-remake is now rendered altogether moot. Returning after the H-bomb crater of The Beach to an ultra-cheap guerrilla moviemaking he'd never actually experienced, Boyle allows the digital fuzz to despoil powerful post-apocalyptic tableaux, as if the film itself were news footage, and offers up only fleeting glimpses of historically suggestive imagery (an inert Payloader full of gray bodies is a mere reflection in a passing car window). He also overemploys the ubiquitous Saving Private Ryan shutter-strobe effect during action scenes, using its eye-upsetting tumult to economically disguise the fact that very little of the flesh-rending and limb-hacking is actually on-screen. (This technique is also forgiving to drooling zombie actors.) The subjective approximation of a hysterical, head-shaking frenzy, it's a presumptuous strategy that gets under your skin anyway.

It's a shame Boyle and Garland took only what was easy in Romero (the ecstasy of shopping in an unpoliced world, the unambiguous joy of mowing down subhumans) and didn't dig for metaphoric frisson. Romero had Vietnam and post-industrial consumerism; what do Boyle and Garland have? The threat of instant infection—Gleeson's jovial dad meets a decidedly outrageous fate, seen from the inside of a falling drop of blood—only evokes itself. Pick your virus. There's nothing as transgressive in 28 Days Later as the Night of the Living Dead moment in which a newly resurrected child zombie eviscerates and cannibalizes her own mother, or, for that matter, Night's final evocation of mid-century Alabama. Garland's script has the kernel of an idea in the third act, when the survivors find Eccleston's army brigade holed up in a country mansion, ready to restart the human race. As in Romero's severely underrated The Crazies, the dread of military enforcement outweighs the fear of what it's meant to control. For Naomie Harris's wary, fierce machete-maiden, the prospect of being a jarhead concubine and gunpoint baby factory makes the landscape of man-eaters look reasonable.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: 28dayslater; britflick; british; ecoterror; film; flick; movie; notpms
"Dawn of the Dead" is utter garbage compared to this film. I saw it and it was well done with a postive ending. Actors I liked the most were the girl and her father. She has a career ahead of her.

I'm a big Terminator fan so that's next and only other movie of interest.

1 posted on 06/27/2003 4:48:52 PM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: dennisw
"Dawn of the Dead" is utter garbage compared to this film

Them are fighting words


2 posted on 06/27/2003 4:56:07 PM PDT by Hazzardgate (if you get my drift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hazzardgate
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/28DaysLater-1123236/reviews.php?rtp=1
28 Days Later (2003
  

 RATING: FRESH  READING: 88%
(FRESH = 60% or Greater)
  Reviews counted: 117
Fresh: 103  Rotten: 14
Average Rating: 7.5/10

3 posted on 06/27/2003 5:04:29 PM PDT by dennisw (G-d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Hey, no need to preach to the choir! I liked 28 DAYS LATER. But it's not a patch on DAWN, or even DAY OF THE DEAD.

And I can't understand why everyone is comparing it to the Romero trilogy ...

28 DAYS LATER steals/homages much more from John Wyndam's "Day of the Triffids", both the novel and the 1981 BBC television adaptation.

4 posted on 06/27/2003 5:08:14 PM PDT by Hazzardgate (if you get my drift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Hazzardgate
28 DAYS LATER steals/homages much more from John Wyndam's "Day of the Triffids", both the novel and the 1981 BBC television adaptation.

How about a slightly parallel "sequel" to 12 Monkeys. Except regular zoo animals were released rather than medical ones.

5 posted on 06/27/2003 5:13:05 PM PDT by rabidralph (First Aid to libs? Coulterize the wound.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
When I first saw this title, I thought it was going to be a movie about PMS.
6 posted on 06/27/2003 5:14:18 PM PDT by rabidralph (First Aid to libs? Coulterize the wound.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hazzardgate
And I can't understand why everyone is comparing it to the Romero trilogy ...

I agree. It steals from "On the Beach" but so what? It's a good "end of the world" movie. I liked how he had the same pounding music at beginning and end.

I liked this all Brit film... more raw and spare than if Hollywood made it

7 posted on 06/27/2003 5:14:40 PM PDT by dennisw (G-d is at war with Amalek for all generations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph
Definately ..... I think Alex Garland intended it to be a pot porri of ideas and references from other films and books. It also references THREADS, the British nuclear war film from 1983 that was their responce to THE DAY AFTER.

I have a multi-region DVD player, so I've had 28 DAYS LATER on disc for months (it was released in the UK months ago). There is a very neat extra about the original ending, which was far more bleak. Shame they didn't use it!

8 posted on 06/27/2003 5:16:10 PM PDT by Hazzardgate (if you get my drift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: rabidralph
When I first saw this title, I thought it was going to be a movie about PMS.

There are still some things too gruesome for the movies.

9 posted on 06/27/2003 5:22:43 PM PDT by JennysCool
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
lol ...

On a similar tip, I hear that some people think 28 DAYS LATER is infact a sequel to


10 posted on 06/27/2003 5:26:08 PM PDT by Hazzardgate (if you get my drift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: JennysCool
LOL! Too true. And it would be an NC-17 at a minimum. Like Jack said, some people "can't handle the truth."
11 posted on 06/27/2003 5:45:34 PM PDT by rabidralph (First Aid to libs? Coulterize the wound.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
I'm a big Terminator fan so that's next

Chick Terminator = Crap.

IMHO, of course.

12 posted on 06/27/2003 6:36:41 PM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Well, dennis, we'll have to disagree on this one. Yes, I liked the ending. That was good. But it really dragged during too much of the movie. I was getting antsy way too often.

The zombies weren't as much scary as disgusting. It frustrated me that the characters only had bats and knives to defend themselves (yes, I know it's England and they can't have guns, but nonetheless, it was maddening. I mean, I'd find a crossbow at the very least.) Stabbing the zombies up close and personal was a big risk to the attacker with all the blood splattering around, so why not find some weapons so you didn't have to get so close to them?

I did not like the main young guy, but that's completely subjective I know. He was a total wimp until the end.

I suppose I was expecting more of a creepy 'vibe' that the website had promised but didn't deliver.

Bottom line: wished I'd waited until the DVD came out.

That's all. Maybe I was expecting too much. Nothing compares to The Stand's first couple of hours for creepy end of the world stuff. Now THAT was excellent.
13 posted on 06/28/2003 12:25:07 AM PDT by vikingchick
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
The movie was awesome, although roughly 20 or so people left in the middle, I think the people that left were wanting a lame, kill'em all and blood everywhere type movie and were disappointed with a smart and tense movie.

The movie had people on the edge of their seats and remined me of the first night showing of "Blair Witch" a few years ago

14 posted on 06/29/2003 1:37:13 AM PDT by stuck_in_new_orleans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hazzardgate
28 DAYS LATER steals/homages much more from John Wyndam's "Day of the Triffids", both the novel and the 1981 BBC television adaptation.

HOLY CRAP!! I've been looking for a copy of that television adaptation forever!

Umm, You wouldn't happen to have a copy, would ya?

15 posted on 06/29/2003 1:54:31 AM PDT by RandallFlagg ("There are worse things than crucifixion...There are teeth.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Not bad, BUT: Suspension of Disbelief (besides the Zombie thing, that is...). Okay, even with the stringent firearms restrictions in the UK, I believe it would have been possible to find something with a little more "reach" then Molotov Cocktails, a machete, tire iron, or a baseball bat (hmmm--perchance it should have been a "cricket" bat...). Hey--even the British Constabulary have desginated armed tactical response teams. Or how about a set of matched 12-bore Purdies from an outdoor shop? Not to mention TA armouries in most communities. C'mon--they coulda scounged up something a little more potent. And, when our intrepid bike courier turned Rambo DID have a chance at all of those handy SA-80s laying about, he mostly trod upon them, uilizing one only to free the "pet" zombie the Squaddies had chained up for "observation" (btw--kind of a ripoff of "Bub" in "Day of the Living Dead). Arms issues aside, I did enjoy the flick quite a bit--kind of a anglophile having lived in the UK for over four years. Better than "28 Days Later," was a vintage BBC Series "Survivors." True post-plague survival stuff and even aired on PBS in North Dakota!! Ah, time to put on the Barbour and sit back with some Maltesers and a pint of bitter...
Nahbi
p.s. This movie made it's U.S. debut, I believe, at the 2003 Sundance Film Festival.. I didn't get to see it, though, as I was working. Oliver Stone's "Commandante" was pretty darn fine, however...
16 posted on 06/30/2003 1:37:47 PM PDT by nahbi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Bite your tongue! Although I have yet to see 28 days, but I don't see how that is possible.
17 posted on 07/29/2003 12:03:18 PM PDT by Grit (Tolerance for all but the intolerant...and those who tolerate intolerance etc etc)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
Saw 28 Days Later on F/X a couple of nights ago.

The first half was very good, but the second half when they got to the Army base dragged on and was boring.

18 posted on 03/17/2006 4:03:27 PM PST by Dane ( anyone who believes hillary would do something to stop illegal immigration is believing gibberish)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson