Skip to comments.
Dems Declare Political War in the House
Fox News ^
| 6/27/03
| Kelley Beaucar Vlahos
Posted on 06/27/2003 6:07:57 AM PDT by Pest
Edited on 04/22/2004 12:36:42 AM PDT by Jim Robinson.
[history]
WASHINGTON
(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...
TOPICS: Breaking News
KEYWORDS: dems; fillibuster
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Hoyer testified that, when Democrats controlled the House, we did not always provide for fair debates. We should neither excuse those past practices, nor countenance the current ones." Translation: We know we did it, but it's unfair now.
1
posted on
06/27/2003 6:07:57 AM PDT
by
Pest
To: Pest
Unlike the Senate, I don't think there is a whole lot they can do in the House.
2
posted on
06/27/2003 6:09:07 AM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Pest
yup.
House rules give the minority party less leeway in fighting the majoritys agenda
Gee, I wonder where these rules originated?
3
posted on
06/27/2003 6:10:31 AM PDT
by
SC_Republican
(mmmm....FOOTBALL)
To: Pest
There are some more dramatic ways we can express ourselves. Oh, no...they're gonna bring on the puppeteers again!
To: SC_Republican
My gosh, let me mark this day on my calendar. Democrats are actually complaining! Who could have predicted this?
5
posted on
06/27/2003 6:12:52 AM PDT
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: Pest
Mr. Speaker, this is one of the most cynical, arrogant displays of power that I have ever witnessed in this House, Hoyer charged during a June 12 debate on the GOP proposal.Hmmmmmmm I guess this maroon wasn't around for the 40+ years the dims controlled the House!
6
posted on
06/27/2003 6:13:19 AM PDT
by
borisbob69
(This space available...)
To: Pest
I just noticed something: 229-206. What were the numbers when the GOP first took the House in 1994? We have been led to believe in every election that we were "losing ground," but this seems up several seats from just a couple of years ago, and about where we were in 1994, is it not?
7
posted on
06/27/2003 6:18:08 AM PDT
by
LS
To: SC_Republican
House rules give the minority party less leeway in fighting the majoritys agenda Isn't that the way a democratic form of government is supposed to work? The People elect the representatives they think will best represent their views in congress. If the majority of the representatives are Republican, then that's what The People want. Therefore, the majority should rule.
8
posted on
06/27/2003 6:26:11 AM PDT
by
Pest
To: LS
230 in 1995. We should have 230 now but LA-05 screwed it up for us.
9
posted on
06/27/2003 6:28:04 AM PDT
by
GraniteStateConservative
(Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
To: LS
The GOP gained about 5-6 seats last election, as I recall.
10
posted on
06/27/2003 6:28:08 AM PDT
by
Coop
(God bless our troops!)
To: Pest
Or, "It was okay when we did itm but not when it is being doen to us."
If I were the Republican leadership, I would nationalize the next race and highlight the Rats' policy of obstructionism.
11
posted on
06/27/2003 6:30:48 AM PDT
by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: Pest
I heard an audio clip on the radio this morning but I didn't catch the name of the Senator who made the following statement on the medicare bill: "It used to be that GOP stood for Grand Ole Party. Now it stands for Get Old People". How low can you go?
To: Gabrielle Reilly
ping
To: SC_Republican
> House rules give the minority party less leeway in fighting the majoritys agenda Gee, I wonder where these rules originated?
I'll wager that the most-restrictive on the minority's power came into being between January 5, 1955 and January 3, 1995 when the DemonRATs had a 40-year lock on the House.
14
posted on
06/27/2003 6:40:46 AM PDT
by
steveegg
(Close only counts in horseshoes, hand grenades, air-burst artillery and thermonuclear weapons)
To: Pest
Just Dems being Dems, stomping their feet and turning blue when they don't get their way.
15
posted on
06/27/2003 6:41:05 AM PDT
by
Mind-numbed Robot
(Not all things that need to be done need to be done by the government.)
To: Pest
Do it, DemonRats! You're not angry and militant enough.
This is all they can do. It's not like they have a vision, an actual plan, or any reasonable justification for what they want.
16
posted on
06/27/2003 6:42:03 AM PDT
by
Excuse_My_Bellicosity
(No animals were harmed during the making of this post.)
To: Pest
How about this Dem House member:
As sometimes happens with Rep. Patrick Kennedy (D-R.I.), he let his mouth race ahead of his brain Wednesday night at a gathering of Young Democrats at the Washington nightspot Acropolis. After presidential candidate Howard Dean spoke, Kennedy delivered an impassioned peroration against President Bush's tax cut. We hear that Kennedy told the crowd: "I don't need Bush's tax cut. I have never worked a [bleeping] day in my life." With that he got the audience's attention -- the dropping-jaws kind.
To: freeperfromnj
"It used to be that GOP stood for Grand Ole Party. Now it stands for Get Old People". Maybe someone who has followed politics longer than I can remember when that was first used. I think it might have started back in the Reagan years.
18
posted on
06/27/2003 6:50:04 AM PDT
by
StriperSniper
(Frogs are for gigging)
To: Pest
Hoyer testified that, when Democrats controlled the House, we did not always provide for fair debates. We should neither excuse those past practices, nor countenance the current ones."..Translation: We know we did it, but it's unfair now.????...No Answer Required...Anybody have the New 'RAT (baby Crying) seal Avail.?
19
posted on
06/27/2003 6:51:23 AM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
To: freeperfromnj
I heard an audio clip on the radio this morning but I didn't catch the name of the Senator who made the following statement on the medicare bill: "It used to be that GOP stood for Grand Ole Party. Now it stands for Get Old People". How low can you go?The Very, very, Elderly, Senile Sen. Fritz Hollings..from S.C., I believe.
20
posted on
06/27/2003 6:57:23 AM PDT
by
skinkinthegrass
(Just because you're paranoid,doesn't mean they aren't out to get you. :)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-50 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson