To: DoughtyOne
Although I agree with you on most of your points, I can't put Carter in the same pen as Kennedy and Clinton. Even though Carter was not a very good President, he was and still is a man with very high character.
To: MrSpencer
Even though Carter was not a very good President, he was and still is a man with very high character.Welcome to Free Republic, Mr. Spencer.
Your assertion of Carter's character shows that while you may have woken up by joining FR today, you have been sleeping since 1976.
FreeRepublic search by keyword: Jimmy Carter
The man has plenty of ego, is a socialist pr!ck and has no character whatsoever.
51 posted on
06/27/2003 5:15:35 AM PDT by
metesky
(Let us go among them." Rev. Capt. Samuel Johnston Clayton - Ward Bond, "The Searchers")
To: MrSpencer
With all due respect, the man who betrayed the Shah of Iran because he was evil, thus destablizing the entire middle east, is the same man who meets with people like Fidel Castro and the leaders of North Korea.
The Shaw was our ally and a good friend of the west. Fidel Castro is not, yet Carter gets downright giddy in his presence and advocates opening up relations with Cuba. Ask yourself why he doesn't rate the Shah treatment? I think it will begin to dawn on you that Carter operates by a different set of morals than most of us do, and I don't mean that in a flattering way.
In North Korea Carter bought more time for them to develop nuclear weapons.
Carter is not a man of high character.
To: MrSpencer
Even though Carter was not a very good President, he was and still is a man with very high character. Then please explain why he is best buddies with the likes of Fidek Castro and why Jimmy always manages to stick up for Dictators and slams the USA every chance he can.
82 posted on
06/27/2003 9:19:59 AM PDT by
Mo1
To: MrSpencer
Welcome to Free Republic, Jimmah Carter!
He's a sleaze bag.
To: MrSpencer
"Even though Carter was not a very good President,
he was and still is a man with very high character." Exactly what does that mean -- "high character."
Does Carter's lying to the American people in regards to North Korean nukes
just to get a Nobel Peace Prize constitute "high character?" Or his recent trashing of
Pres. Bush and America's effort in Iraq?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson