Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gays Overjoyed, Conservatives Despair Over Sodomy Ruling (Mega-barf ALERT)
Associated Press ^ | 06-26-03

Posted on 06/26/2003 5:44:54 PM PDT by Brian S

Edited on 04/13/2004 2:42:50 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

In a gesture of gratitude for the Supreme Court's decision Thursday striking down a Texas anti-sodomy law, gay-rights activists lowered the huge rainbow flag that always flies over the city's Castro District and hoisted the Stars and Stripes in its place.


(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: activistcourt; activistsupremecourt; cutlurewar; downourthroats; druglaws; homosexualagenda; incestlaws; lawrencevtexas; notconsentingadults; privacylaws; prostitutionlaws; samesexdisorder; sodomylaws
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last
To: 2rightsleftcoast
why we have to be bombarded with gay rights issues contantly.

Because the Homosexualist Lobby (AKA The Cult Of The Anus) insist that you affirm their particular coupling methodology that identifies their very existance. In other words, because they jam a man's penis into the anus of some other man, that in of itself is what identifies their very reason for existance. Its a form of dominaton and submission. (In some primitive warring cultures it was used as a means of humiliation and to establish a heirarchy.) And by insisting that you and your pre-teen children fully understand every detail of their coupling methodologies, they indirectly get to dominate (or if you wish, to ideologically sodomize) you.

Their apparachiks in the LEFTIST media are only too happy to metaphorically hold you down while you are gang-banged nightly by the LEFT on the tee vee and local radio.

Of course you are expected to shut the hell up and take it because that's exactly what you have done thus far. The LEFT knows you will be compliant because you have been compliant during previous @$$rimmings.
41 posted on 06/26/2003 6:31:36 PM PDT by pyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: 2rightsleftcoast
Exactly. You tell me that if the police were beating down your door you'd continue. Conservatives need to get with the new program. Courts are the way to go. Sue your way to victory. Who needs legislatures? Save money and get rid of 'em.
42 posted on 06/26/2003 6:32:36 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: psychoknk
that's not what this case was about, and its not really about the sodomy laws either. Its about adoption, gay marriage, the ability to legally teach the lifestyle in the public schools, etc. Things like the ability to have legal wills, or health care proxies, those are chicken feed. Keep your eye on the big three: adoption, marriage, schools.
43 posted on 06/26/2003 6:34:11 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
I don't want us to play the lefts game of let's sue everybody, but I would love our leaders to speak out much more forcefully on the complete hyprocrasy of the other side.
44 posted on 06/26/2003 6:48:43 PM PDT by 2rightsleftcoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: pyx
Wow! Great post.
45 posted on 06/26/2003 6:50:59 PM PDT by 2rightsleftcoast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: AmericaUnited
look for the std spike in 6 months
46 posted on 06/26/2003 6:52:46 PM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: psychoknk
it a decision that should have been made at the state level not the supreme court. This is a state legislation. Its not about homsexual soddomy its about the origins of legislation.
47 posted on 06/26/2003 6:55:04 PM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Southack
I concur. What passes for 'Conservatism' around here, is more often and more accurately called Fundamentalist Theocracy.
48 posted on 06/26/2003 6:55:21 PM PDT by Lazamataz (PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Homosexuality:

Homosexuality is deviant sexual behavior and a mental illness.

Homosexuals: 1) subject their body parts to uses nature did not intend, such activities often presenting immediate risk to the participants; 2) are prone to greater suicide, depression and other mental disorders and deficiencies than the heterosexual population at large; 3) are prone to far greater sexually transmitted diseases, including AIDS, than the (normal) heterosexual population; 4) molest young people (pedophilia) at a far greater rate than heterosexuals; 5) engage in degrading sexual promiscuity, oftentimes engaging in risky sex with many partners during the same event; 6) are engaged in aggressive and widespread efforts to indoctrinate our children by introducing the homosexual lifestyle using public schools as the primary indoctrination “vehicle” and likewise, through the movie/music/TV industry, with the dual goals of gaining school-age acceptance of homosexuality and encouraging sexual activity among children, especially same-sex experimentation; 7) view most everything through a mindset heavily biased in favor of the homosexual lifestyle and culture, which renders them mostly useless when asked to opine on matters that normal heterosexuals better resolve.

The mental deficiencies described herein applying to homosexuals shall not be confused with the deficiencies associated with the left wing democrat/socialist/Marxist/ feminist/environmentalists, etc., mind, which have their own distinct set of mental disorders.

This doesn't even touch on what the Bible has to say about homosexuality.

49 posted on 06/26/2003 6:56:07 PM PDT by Imagine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz
I concur. What passes for 'Conservatism' around here, is more often and more accurately called Fundamentalist Theocracy

I dissent, the reasoning in the majority opinion does away with the necessity for legislatures, legislators and states.

Applauding this opinion is like giving a tip to the executioner. Judicial activism at it's all time worst.

50 posted on 06/26/2003 6:57:09 PM PDT by jwalsh07
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Lazamataz; Southack
You guys should read Scalia's dissent before you dismiss 3,000 years of civilization so easily.
51 posted on 06/26/2003 6:58:23 PM PDT by The Old Hoosier (Right makes might.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: Newbomb Turk
I wonder how many freaks will celibrate my taking it up the a** tonight

What a horribly unfortunate typographical error! LOL

52 posted on 06/26/2003 7:01:20 PM PDT by Petronski (I'm not always cranky.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

Comment #53 Removed by Moderator

To: aimhigh
Too late, [AIDS] already gets 20 times what cancer research is getting.

Won't you post us a link where you get that number and then I'll post a link from the National Institute for Health showing that your assertion is an outright and wildly ridiculous lie.

54 posted on 06/26/2003 7:05:47 PM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ladyinred
Very well stated -- the RATs that hated the SCOTUS love them now!

What gets me is that the Justices who were opposed to getting involved in Florida now think it is alright to overrule a State.

Something is wrong with that picture!
55 posted on 06/26/2003 7:10:28 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: jwalsh07
why do we even have states any more? Why not just get rid of the electoral college and all state borders. We could save trillions by eliminating not only state government budgets, but the state governments themselves.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.(/s)
56 posted on 06/26/2003 7:10:31 PM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Southack
Very good points!

Then we have the DemocRATs that planned to demonize the judges that would be appointed by Republican Presidents if the RATs didn't get out and vote. I don't think their voting numbers are going to compare to conservatives fed up with activist, liberal judges.

57 posted on 06/26/2003 7:14:36 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
You forgot about the NJ sentor switch.

It seems to be a bedroom issue. It may just be that outside the bedroom, the rules will change. This would mean that states can regulate homosexual adoption, dual sex mariage, and public istitutions.

The danger is that this opinion may have reduced marriage from a societal institution to a mere contract. (massachusetts alert for reasoning predictions)
58 posted on 06/26/2003 7:16:37 PM PDT by longtermmemmory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: longtermmemmory
it a decision that should have been made at the state level not the supreme court. This is a state legislation.

The USSC did in this case exactly what they're supposed to, weigh the constitutionality of the laws. It heard the arguments and decided this Texas law was unconstitutional. They did not legislate from the bench.

The same crowd who is droning on, accusing the USSC of judicial activism are the same usual suspects who were probably pleased as punch when the court ruled against state laws allowing assisted suicide and medical marijuana.

Somehow I'm sure you'll find a way of reconciling the hypocrisy, but it certainly takes a special form of denial to do so.

59 posted on 06/26/2003 7:19:59 PM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Petronski
It's not every day you see such a bold confession here on FR.
60 posted on 06/26/2003 7:22:09 PM PDT by tdadams
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson