To: Southack
I concur. What passes for 'Conservatism' around here, is more often and more accurately called Fundamentalist Theocracy.
48 posted on
06/26/2003 6:55:21 PM PDT by
Lazamataz
(PROUDLY POSTING WITHOUT READING THE ARTICLE SINCE 1999!)
To: Lazamataz
I concur. What passes for 'Conservatism' around here, is more often and more accurately called Fundamentalist TheocracyI dissent, the reasoning in the majority opinion does away with the necessity for legislatures, legislators and states.
Applauding this opinion is like giving a tip to the executioner. Judicial activism at it's all time worst.
50 posted on
06/26/2003 6:57:09 PM PDT by
jwalsh07
To: Lazamataz; Southack
You guys should read Scalia's dissent before you dismiss 3,000 years of civilization so easily.
To: Lazamataz
I concur. What passes for 'Conservatism' around here, is more often and more accurately called Fundamentalist Theocracy. 'tis what happens when you run off the libertian thinkers for political (election) expediency..
There's less people left to combat them.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson