To: shadowman99
<I'm not an attorney, but to me the jury didn't take time to fully review the facts of the case before rendering a verdict. That's grounds for an appeal.
i am an attorney. i don't worry so much about the time it took to reach a verdict as being grounds for an appeal. they heard the evidence in the courtroom. if everyone thought she was guilty and they took a poll as soon as they entered the jury room, and they agreed w/each other, why waste time?
however, i was able to watch most of the case and think she might have grounds to appeal on ineffective assistance of counsel. i didn't want her to get off due to some fancy footwork by counsel, however, there were times when he didn't object, there were expert witnesses he could have called, etc.
just a thought, i'm not looking to free her. i'd be happy to seal her cell door shut. just don't be surprised when the appeal is filed.
To: radiohead
I think the problem about expert witnesses is that they are dealing with the same evidence!
72 posted on
06/26/2003 11:06:57 AM PDT by
MEG33
To: radiohead
The appeal will be filed. The verdict will be overturned because she had an inadequate defense. A high profile attorney will take her case. She will be retried and convicted of a lesser crime.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson