Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: shadowman99
<I'm not an attorney, but to me the jury didn't take time to fully review the facts of the case before rendering a verdict. That's grounds for an appeal.

i am an attorney. i don't worry so much about the time it took to reach a verdict as being grounds for an appeal. they heard the evidence in the courtroom. if everyone thought she was guilty and they took a poll as soon as they entered the jury room, and they agreed w/each other, why waste time?

however, i was able to watch most of the case and think she might have grounds to appeal on ineffective assistance of counsel. i didn't want her to get off due to some fancy footwork by counsel, however, there were times when he didn't object, there were expert witnesses he could have called, etc.

just a thought, i'm not looking to free her. i'd be happy to seal her cell door shut. just don't be surprised when the appeal is filed.
67 posted on 06/26/2003 10:53:00 AM PDT by radiohead
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies ]


To: radiohead
I think the problem about expert witnesses is that they are dealing with the same evidence!
72 posted on 06/26/2003 11:06:57 AM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

To: radiohead
The appeal will be filed. The verdict will be overturned because she had an inadequate defense. A high profile attorney will take her case. She will be retried and convicted of a lesser crime.
81 posted on 06/26/2003 11:22:35 AM PDT by EveningStar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson