Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: section9
Yep, relevant points for when the Dems start yelping about Bush letting Bin Laden get away:

1) Bill Clinton decided not to act and put off using the drones(not taking action, passing the buck)

2) Bush was planning on how to attack Bin Laden Sept. 4, 2001(being proactive)
9 posted on 06/24/2003 7:57:04 PM PDT by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]


To: Diddle E. Squat
What I'd like to know is why did it take 9/11 for the full weight of the U.S. military to be thrown against Bin Laden?

Why wasn't the Cole attack used to justify an all-out assault on Bin Laden instead of waiting for something larger to happen? Bush should have made this priority #1 when he took office.
12 posted on 06/24/2003 8:05:44 PM PDT by stimpyone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson