To: section9
Yep, relevant points for when the Dems start yelping about Bush letting Bin Laden get away:
1) Bill Clinton decided not to act and put off using the drones(not taking action, passing the buck)
2) Bush was planning on how to attack Bin Laden Sept. 4, 2001(being proactive)
To: Diddle E. Squat
What I'd like to know is why did it take 9/11 for the full weight of the U.S. military to be thrown against Bin Laden?
Why wasn't the Cole attack used to justify an all-out assault on Bin Laden instead of waiting for something larger to happen? Bush should have made this priority #1 when he took office.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson