Posted on 06/23/2003 2:13:00 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford
The Great Gay Con
Exclusive commentary by Patrick Rooney
Jun 23, 2003
Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien said last week his country would officially recognize same-sex marriages. The announcement followed court rulings in Canada striking down the countrys definition of marriage because it specified a union between a man and a woman. But it is just the latest action signaling the successful implementation of one of the greatest cons of our time.
Homosexuality has historically been seen as anti-God and anti-nature. Society has shunned it, often making light of it to mask its revulsion. Even today, the average person still cringes when they see two men mouth-kissing one another. The truth is, the practice is innately abhorrent, and yet a great many of us have been made to believe gay is good, or at least one more acceptable choice from lifes grand smorgasbord.
It started with an assault on our perception of reality. The sixties exploration of freedom began the path down that slippery slope. Rebellion against the order of things. And what greater rebellion than for a man or woman do go against their very own nature?
Language being important, the word homosexual was overthrown, and replaced with the happy word gay.
Liberal ideas spilled into every facet of life, including the clergy. Do not judge, lest ye be judged seemed to be the only verse in the entire Bible that liberals knew. Never mind they had no clue as to the real meaning of the verse, and that taken to its logical conclusion, do not judge would lead to total anarchy. Of course they didnt really mean, do not judge, they only meant for others not to dare attempt to see and comment on their corrupt behavior.
So homosexuals not only came out of the closet, they attempted to stuff those of us who saw their deviancy into closets. But the greatest victory homosexuals have ever had was AIDS. Thats right, AIDS. How can you say that? Millions have died, particularly gays! Yes, that is truly a tragedy.
But from virtually day one of the AIDS pandemic, homosexuals have furiously spun themselves and others away from the reality that they were the primary group spreading the disease. Its not a gay disease! theyd protest.
Homosexual activists struggled desperately against any public health measures designed to curb the spread of the disease, as had been done in previous epidemics, and is being done now with the SARS disease. Instead, without evidence, theyd relentlessly educate us on every way we couldnt contract it.
Despite the fact that homosexuals were the primary carriers and perpetrators of the disease, they brilliantly changed the perception in much of the publics mind, by focusing on their brethren dying, rather than the actual reason for the deaths. Yes, they are victims. But they are also undeniably perpetrators.
Victims receive sympathy. And thats the key to understanding the con. The greatest failure of homosexualsthis unspeakable tragedy they have inflicted on themselves and the worldhas ironically turned into their greatest tactical victory via that sympathy. Homosexuality is more institutionally and socially acceptable than ever before!
The rage that is in the heart of the homosexual, be it toward a parent or a past sexual abuser, is the real issue that needs to be dealt with. But instead of facing up to that challenge, homosexuals and our society have increasingly accepted and even celebrated the aberrant expression of that rage.
The Canadian prime minister has unfortunately fallen into this trap too, announcing the recognition of same-sex marriage, thereby legitimizing and rewarding a lifestyle that leads to death.
In Canada, a narrow majority polled54 percentare in favor of same-sex marriage. Fortunately, most Americans still have some sanity intact, and accept it in far lower numbers. But the same rot that is destroying Canada can destroy us too, if we let it.
America is increasingly being isolated by a weak, corrupt world. But we must never be tempted to lower our standards in responseto do so would be fatal. Its time Americans took an honest look at homosexuality and its true origins, lest we fall to the same fate of our northern neighbor, and a shameless world on the downslide.
_________________________________________________________
Patrick Rooney is the Director of Special Projects at BOND, the Brotherhood Organization of A New Destiny, a nonprofit organization dedicated to Rebuilding the Family By Rebuilding the Man.
For more information, please visit www.bondinfo.org , call 1-800-411-BOND (2663), or write to feedback@washingtondispatch.com.
Just invented for fictional entertainment reading purposes huh? That isnt logical is it?
but again, it's before the Sixties.
It was the gay nineties, thats the 1890s and not gay in its current meaning, when the first openly public support for homosexuality began by European intellectual elites. And the sixties in the article is referring to the sexual revolution and is accurate in doing so.
See, Cathryn, here's still another historical view. Again, before the Sixties!
And the sixties in the article is referring to the sexual revolution and is accurate in doing so.
The "real" sexual revolution began in the Fifties, not the Sixties! The folks were like rabbits back in the Fifties.
Well...since he was alive at that point, I guess he has plenty of knowledge about it.
Well, that could be. Who knows? You know, not everyone was invited to the Sexual Revolution. ;-)
Definitely. I am also creeped out by the girl/girl thing, although I can tolerate watching it more than I can two men together. That's the worst.
------------------------
Gay is short for "gay Lothario." It was coineed by gays.
The real Paul McCartney died in a car crash before his "substitute" later formed Wings. The real Paul McCartney couldn't play bass worth a damn. :-)
Sigh. Religionoids make stuff up like this and then cite is as fact. If this guy would crawl out of his cave from time to time he would find out that there are cultures where a greeting between two men includes a mouth on mouth kiss.
Exactly. The state has no business defining marriage of any sort, other than to recognize any voluntarily entered contractual relationship.
Scenic Sounds was alive when Leviticus and Romans were written?
Sigh
do you know the difference between sexual and plutonic, a kiss an "kissing"?
Compelling states interest maybe?
other than to recognize any voluntarily entered contractual relationship.
Why? Try going to a lawyer for your contracts outside of marriage, I hear they are very helpful.
That case can be made after every war ever fought and is more true in the late 40s than it was in the 50s. Historically the sexual revolution started in the late 60s with the feminist movement
burning bras etc.
The 1950s had Hugh Hefner and Kinsey. A revolution needs its leaders.
LSD existed in the 1950s but it took Timothy Leary on the East coast and Ken Kesey on the West coast to make it an indulgence.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.