Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Great "Gay" Con
The Washington Dispatch | June 23, 2003 | Patrick Rooney

Posted on 06/23/2003 2:13:00 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford

The Great “Gay” Con

Exclusive commentary by Patrick Rooney

Jun 23, 2003

Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien said last week his country would officially recognize same-sex marriages. The announcement followed court rulings in Canada striking down the country’s definition of marriage because it specified a union between a man and a woman. But it is just the latest action signaling the successful implementation of one of the greatest cons of our time.

Homosexuality has historically been seen as anti-God and anti-nature. Society has shunned it, often making light of it to mask its revulsion. Even today, the average person still cringes when they see two men mouth-kissing one another. The truth is, the practice is innately abhorrent, and yet a great many of us have been made to believe gay is good, or at least one more acceptable choice from life’s grand smorgasbord.

It started with an assault on our perception of reality. The sixties exploration of “freedom” began the path down that slippery slope. Rebellion against the order of things. And what greater rebellion than for a man or woman do go against their very own nature?

Language being important, the word “homosexual” was overthrown, and replaced with the happy word “gay.”

Liberal ideas spilled into every facet of life, including the clergy. “Do not judge, lest ye be judged” seemed to be the only verse in the entire Bible that liberals knew. Never mind they had no clue as to the real meaning of the verse, and that taken to its logical conclusion, “do not judge” would lead to total anarchy. Of course they didn’t really mean, “do not judge”, they only meant for others not to dare attempt to see and comment on their corrupt behavior.

So homosexuals not only came out of the closet, they attempted to stuff those of us who saw their deviancy into closets. But the greatest victory homosexuals have ever had was AIDS. That’s right, AIDS. “How can you say that?” “Millions have died, particularly gays!” Yes, that is truly a tragedy.

But from virtually day one of the AIDS pandemic, homosexuals have furiously spun themselves and others away from the reality that they were the primary group spreading the disease. “It’s not a gay disease!” they’d protest.

Homosexual activists struggled desperately against any public health measures designed to curb the spread of the disease, as had been done in previous epidemics, and is being done now with the SARS disease. Instead, without evidence, they’d relentlessly “educate” us on every way we couldn’t contract it.

Despite the fact that homosexuals were the primary carriers and perpetrators of the disease, they brilliantly changed the perception in much of the public’s mind, by focusing on their brethren dying, rather than the actual reason for the deaths. Yes, they are victims. But they are also undeniably perpetrators.

“Victims” receive sympathy. And that’s the key to understanding the con. The greatest failure of homosexuals—this unspeakable tragedy they have inflicted on themselves and the world—has ironically turned into their greatest tactical victory via that sympathy. Homosexuality is more institutionally and socially acceptable than ever before!

The rage that is in the heart of the homosexual, be it toward a parent or a past sexual abuser, is the real issue that needs to be dealt with. But instead of facing up to that challenge, homosexuals and our society have increasingly accepted and even celebrated the aberrant expression of that rage.

The Canadian prime minister has unfortunately fallen into this trap too, announcing the recognition of same-sex marriage, thereby legitimizing and rewarding a “lifestyle” that leads to death.

In Canada, a narrow majority polled—54 percent—are in favor of same-sex marriage. Fortunately, most Americans still have some sanity intact, and accept it in far lower numbers. But the same rot that is destroying Canada can destroy us too, if we let it.

America is increasingly being isolated by a weak, corrupt world. But we must never be tempted to lower our standards in response—to do so would be fatal. It’s time Americans took an honest look at homosexuality and its true origins, lest we fall to the same fate of our northern neighbor, and a shameless world on the downslide.

_________________________________________________________

Patrick Rooney is the Director of Special Projects at BOND, the Brotherhood Organization of A New Destiny, a nonprofit organization dedicated to “Rebuilding the Family By Rebuilding the Man.”

For more information, please visit www.bondinfo.org , call 1-800-411-BOND (2663), or write to feedback@washingtondispatch.com.


TOPICS: Canada; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events; Philosophy
KEYWORDS: canada; christianbashing; culturewar; downourthroats; gay; gaytrolldolls; homosexual; homosexualagenda; hughhewitt; idolatry; libertines; religionbashing; samesexdisorder
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

1 posted on 06/23/2003 2:13:00 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ValenB4; Scenic Sounds; Sir Gawain; gcruse; geedee; DaughterOfAnIwoJimaVet; Chad Fairbanks; ...
Ping for a good read...
2 posted on 06/23/2003 2:15:13 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford (I'm not prejudiced - I hate everybody equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
bump...thanks for the post.
3 posted on 06/23/2003 2:18:25 PM PDT by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Applause! Excellent column!
4 posted on 06/23/2003 2:23:04 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
"Even today, the average person still cringes when they see two men mouth-kissing one another. "

And gets off on seeing two women doing the same thing. Amusing.
5 posted on 06/23/2003 2:23:55 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
What gays do in their private lives is none of my business.

That said, I don't want it to be my business. Get it out of my face. I don't want to pay for domestic benefits with my tax money, and leave marriage alone.

6 posted on 06/23/2003 2:23:59 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Say Hey! Hey! Damn Yankee!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
It's too late. I dare anyone to argue that it isn't.
7 posted on 06/23/2003 2:25:42 PM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
"“Do not judge, lest ye be judged”

I remember seeing a placard once in someone's kitch - it said "Jug not, lest ye be jugged."

(Hic!)

Michael

8 posted on 06/23/2003 2:26:24 PM PDT by Wright is right! (Have a profitable day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
And gets off on seeing two women doing the same thing. Amusing.

Yeah, to be honest, that's something I've often wondered about. I've even asked my male friends. They won't cop to enjoying it to me, but I've heard them talking amongst themselves. I think it's bizzare. Women don't get off on watching men - we think it's just about the nastiest thing we can think of.

9 posted on 06/23/2003 2:26:32 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford (I'm not prejudiced - I hate everybody equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
An honest and accurate explanation of how the west went from a natural revulsion to homosexuality to almost total acceptance of it, manifested in Canada legalizing homosexual 'marriage'.

Thanks for the post. Another 'sad but true' example of the severe decline in western morality and the abandonment of rationality in favor of feel-good concepts and now, laws, that celebrate and affirm deviant behavior. Moral relevancy strikes again.

10 posted on 06/23/2003 2:27:39 PM PDT by Jim Scott (Rugged Individualist in the Nutmeg State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Gay Pride, and Israel (major barfer)
11 posted on 06/23/2003 2:28:41 PM PDT by Alouette (Why is it called "International Law" if only Israel and the United States are expected to keep it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dan from Michigan
Ditto the thought Dan!!
12 posted on 06/23/2003 2:28:55 PM PDT by Springman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Alouette
Yeah, I read through that. My fondest memory is the You'll Die Vomiting!!! sub-title. :)

It's sickening.

13 posted on 06/23/2003 2:30:34 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford (I'm not prejudiced - I hate everybody equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim Scott; Cathryn Crawford; Dan from Michigan
An honest and accurate explanation of how the west went from a natural revulsion to homosexuality to almost total acceptance of it, manifested in Canada legalizing homosexual 'marriage'.

There is nothing new under the sun.

As Pascal noted 400 years ago: Those who indulge in perversion tell those who are living normal lives that it is they who are deviating from what is natural. They think they are following a natural life themselves. They are like people on a ship who think it is those on shore who are moving away. Language is relative everywhere. But we need a fixed point for those who are moving aboard ship. But in morality, where are we going to find a harbor? (697-383)

Pensees, from The Mind On Fire, page 53,Multnomah Press,1989

14 posted on 06/23/2003 2:34:54 PM PDT by Lady Eileen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
BTTT!!!!!!
15 posted on 06/23/2003 2:39:08 PM PDT by E.G.C.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
"Yeah, to be honest, that's something I've often wondered about. I've even asked my male friends. They won't cop to enjoying it to me, but I've heard them talking amongst themselves. I think it's bizzare. Women don't get off on watching men - we think it's just about the nastiest thing we can think of."

I don't know. It's certainly true, though. When you see guys here on FR making anti-homosexual arguments, they're almost always talking about male-male relationships. For some reason, most men seem to enjoy watching two women together. It's a standard scene in just about every porn film ever made.

If you figure it out, let me know.
16 posted on 06/23/2003 2:40:17 PM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
some five or ten years ago, ed rubenstein with the national review reported the odd factoid that the number one predictor of male heterosexuality is being sexually excited by two women [either it's been so long that i've forgotten what he wrote, or he really did use the vulgar expression that comes to mind ... either way, there's no point repeating it].
17 posted on 06/23/2003 2:40:44 PM PDT by johnboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: johnboy; MineralMan
Heck, if I ever figure it out, I'll write a book!
18 posted on 06/23/2003 2:43:10 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford (I'm not prejudiced - I hate everybody equally.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Cathryn Crawford
Yes but many women I know, they like watching two girls too...maybe it psychological...way women handle emotion. Men, healthy men, emotionally isolated from each other...men always to some level in competition. Only during great tragedy do men open up to each other...otherwise, men only open up to woman in life. Women open to each other all time. Big pschological difference.
19 posted on 06/23/2003 2:50:00 PM PDT by RussianConservative (Hristos: the Light of the World)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: MineralMan
With lesbian scenes, most guys are thinking "Here's where I walk in and they go to work on me."

Atavism?
20 posted on 06/23/2003 2:52:33 PM PDT by RinaseaofDs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-116 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson