Posted on 06/23/2003 2:13:00 PM PDT by Cathryn Crawford
The Great “Gay” Con
Exclusive commentary by Patrick Rooney
Jun 23, 2003
Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien said last week his country would officially recognize same-sex marriages. The announcement followed court rulings in Canada striking down the country’s definition of marriage because it specified a union between a man and a woman. But it is just the latest action signaling the successful implementation of one of the greatest cons of our time.
Homosexuality has historically been seen as anti-God and anti-nature. Society has shunned it, often making light of it to mask its revulsion. Even today, the average person still cringes when they see two men mouth-kissing one another. The truth is, the practice is innately abhorrent, and yet a great many of us have been made to believe gay is good, or at least one more acceptable choice from life’s grand smorgasbord.
It started with an assault on our perception of reality. The sixties exploration of “freedom” began the path down that slippery slope. Rebellion against the order of things. And what greater rebellion than for a man or woman do go against their very own nature?
Language being important, the word “homosexual” was overthrown, and replaced with the happy word “gay.”
Liberal ideas spilled into every facet of life, including the clergy. “Do not judge, lest ye be judged” seemed to be the only verse in the entire Bible that liberals knew. Never mind they had no clue as to the real meaning of the verse, and that taken to its logical conclusion, “do not judge” would lead to total anarchy. Of course they didn’t really mean, “do not judge”, they only meant for others not to dare attempt to see and comment on their corrupt behavior.
So homosexuals not only came out of the closet, they attempted to stuff those of us who saw their deviancy into closets. But the greatest victory homosexuals have ever had was AIDS. That’s right, AIDS. “How can you say that?” “Millions have died, particularly gays!” Yes, that is truly a tragedy.
But from virtually day one of the AIDS pandemic, homosexuals have furiously spun themselves and others away from the reality that they were the primary group spreading the disease. “It’s not a gay disease!” they’d protest.
Homosexual activists struggled desperately against any public health measures designed to curb the spread of the disease, as had been done in previous epidemics, and is being done now with the SARS disease. Instead, without evidence, they’d relentlessly “educate” us on every way we couldn’t contract it.
Despite the fact that homosexuals were the primary carriers and perpetrators of the disease, they brilliantly changed the perception in much of the public’s mind, by focusing on their brethren dying, rather than the actual reason for the deaths. Yes, they are victims. But they are also undeniably perpetrators.
“Victims” receive sympathy. And that’s the key to understanding the con. The greatest failure of homosexuals—this unspeakable tragedy they have inflicted on themselves and the world—has ironically turned into their greatest tactical victory via that sympathy. Homosexuality is more institutionally and socially acceptable than ever before!
The rage that is in the heart of the homosexual, be it toward a parent or a past sexual abuser, is the real issue that needs to be dealt with. But instead of facing up to that challenge, homosexuals and our society have increasingly accepted and even celebrated the aberrant expression of that rage.
The Canadian prime minister has unfortunately fallen into this trap too, announcing the recognition of same-sex marriage, thereby legitimizing and rewarding a “lifestyle” that leads to death.
In Canada, a narrow majority polled—54 percent—are in favor of same-sex marriage. Fortunately, most Americans still have some sanity intact, and accept it in far lower numbers. But the same rot that is destroying Canada can destroy us too, if we let it.
America is increasingly being isolated by a weak, corrupt world. But we must never be tempted to lower our standards in response—to do so would be fatal. It’s time Americans took an honest look at homosexuality and its true origins, lest we fall to the same fate of our northern neighbor, and a shameless world on the downslide.
_________________________________________________________
Patrick Rooney is the Director of Special Projects at BOND, the Brotherhood Organization of A New Destiny, a nonprofit organization dedicated to “Rebuilding the Family By Rebuilding the Man.”
For more information, please visit www.bondinfo.org , call 1-800-411-BOND (2663), or write to feedback@washingtondispatch.com.
At least that's what they said.
What? You think any man would lie about this? Lie about something so personal as this? Come on now. Most of these guys are Republicans.
LOL - YES, I DO!
No, no, no. You have this all wrong. Republican men would never lie about something like this. Never. On the other hand, male gendered Democrats (note: I avoided the word "men" here) would lie. For example, it is clear no Repuiblican President would ever make a statement like this:
Bill Clinton: I did not have sex on Air Force One last night with those three interns.
Surely you must agree on this.
Best regards,
When a guy tells you a story that sounds like he read it in Penthouse Forum, there's a very, very good chance that it's an exaggeration, at a minimum.
I always wondered about those letters written by Americans where they talk abou the girls "knickers." Something just did not sound right. LOL
The fact that you let this guy into your house tells me he was giving off signals. Signals such as "I am not a threat" which it appears that he was not.
Signals like "I am good looking and know it. I am confident. Women want me."
He thought you were hot and figured "Why not give her the opportunity to have some fun." (If you don't think your hot, just ask your hubby (assuming he is not a democrat))
Next time he makes a delivery, make sure you have a girl friend with you. :-)
I believe there is a concerted plan to bring this into the "mainstream.
Here is the Six Step Attitudinal Change Plan and how it works:
Step 1. Some practice so offensive that it can scarcely be discussed in public is advocated by a RESPECTED expert in a RESPECTED forum.
Step 2. At first, the public is shocked, then outraged.
Step 3. But, the VERY FACT that such a thing could be publicly debated becomes the SUBJECT of the debate.
Step 4. In the process, sheer repetition of the shocking subject under discussion gradually dulling its effect.
Step 5. People then are no longer shocked by the subject.
Step 6. No longer outraged, people begin to argue for positions to moderate the extreme; or, they accept the premise, challenging, instead, the means to ACHIEVE it
Interestingly : ), I had read a book at one time called The Gift Of Fear, by Gavin de Becker. It's a great book about listening to those "signals" and taking seriously what your subconscious mind is telling you about someone. I was apprehensive about letting this guy in my house (he said he wanted to use my phone, and I stupidly let him in when I could just as easily brought a cordless phone outside...and I'm fairly sure, in retrospect, that the "call" he made wasn't real), but I didn't listen to my intuition.
He thought you were hot and figured "Why not give her the opportunity to have some fun." (If you don't think your hot, just ask your hubby (assuming he is not a democrat))
Well, yes, I think you're right. He thought I was friendly and a fun person. Why he thought that meant I would consider having sex with a complete stranger still escapes me, unless he reads the aforementioned magazine, and thinks that represents reality somehow. LOL
(BTW, I don't have to ask my husband - a conservative - whether he thinks I'm hot. I know he thinks so...but I think it's because he knows me, not because of the way I look.)
Next time he makes a delivery, make sure you have a girl friend with you. :-)
Oh, sure. I know what you're suggesting. I can hear the backbeat already. ; ) (It ain't gonna happen! LOL)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.