Posted on 06/22/2003 9:21:50 AM PDT by Drango
For Immediate Release
June 19, 2003
Statement of Public Broadcasters
In Response to the House Labor/HHS Appropriations Mark-up
[Note to editors and reporters: Today, the U.S. House Labor/HHS/Education Appropriations Subcommittee agreed to the Presidents budget proposal, which provides no new separate funding in FY 04 to public broadcasting for its digital transition or satellite interconnection. Instead, the Subcommittee opted to allow the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) to spend up to $100 million (out of its $380 million 2004 general appropriation) to pay for these important priorities. CPB had requested $60 million in FY04 for digital conversion funds and $20 million in interconnection funds, and $410 million for FY 2006.
Further, the Subcommittee approved only $330 million for CPBs FY 2006 general appropriation, which if enacted would be a $60 million reduction from CPBs FY 05 level ($390 million) and $80 million below CPBs request for 2006.
The House Full Committee on Appropriations is expected to mark-up the funding bill on Wednesday, June 25, 2003. The Senate Subcommittee has tentatively scheduled their mark-up that same day.]
If enacted, the Subcommittees recommendations would be a double blow to public broadcasting. Not only would it fall far short of meeting pressing needs for digital conversion and interconnection, it would reduce federal support by $100 million in fiscal year 2004, resulting in a possible 26 percent cut in operating grants to each of the nations more than 1,000 public television and radio stations.
Further, these cuts would hit public broadcasting stations at an already difficult time, when they are eliminating programming and cutting other services due to the weakened economy, cutbacks in state funding, and increasing operating costs. And, they would inflict serious damage on programs and services that are essential to children, parents and educators alike.
We believe that the Administration and the House recognize public broadcastings need for federal assistance in the digital conversion and interconnection. These technologies are the backbone of public broadcasting. However, cutting operating funds to pay for equipment needs will seriously compromise our mission to deliver quality educational programming and services to the American public. And, such cuts could literally deny the public any new services which the digital investment is intended to make possible.
We are pleased that the Subcommittee recognizes public broadcastings unique needs by providing an advance appropriation. However, the figure proposed would take CPB supported programs back to levels of six years ago.
For 35 years, public broadcasters have met the federal mandate of providing universal service, meaning that every community in America has access to a wealth of independent, non-commercial programming and educational resources, as well as local services that are highly valued by their citizens. This service is deeply threatened by this proposal, as is CPBs investment in new national programming for TV and radio. Given the debate over media consolidation, this is an especially unfortunate time to undermine public broadcasting, the last locally-controlled media in many American communities.
The federal budget process requires difficult choices. Public broadcasters will continue to work with the Administration and Congress to ensure that millions of Americans receive the quality educational public broadcasting services upon which they rely. That is our mission.
###
Robert T. Coonrod, President and CEO, Corporation for Public Broadcasting
Kevin Klose, President and CEO, National Public Radio
John Lawson, President and CEO, Association of Public Television Stations
Pat Mitchell, President and CEO, Public Broadcasting Service
&&&
Typical Rats-- calling it a cut when they just did not get the increase they wanted.
Good...however, there is still no reason *I* should be forced to pay for it.
Yeah but this *maybe* cut of 26% won't happen IMHO. Normally staunch Republicans like Zack Wamp and George Nethercutt who sit on the appropriations committee, ALSO sit on the Friends of "Public Broadcasting" collective. Go figure...
Wamp is a founding member of the Public Broadcasting Caucus Group! (see my home page for a full list...)
Back then, PBS could truly offer the viewer an array of programming not found on regular stations.
But now, we have the History Channel (more than one of them), Discovery (again, several of them), AnimalPlanet, National Geographic Channel, A&E, The Learning Channel, Educational children's programs, all sorts of woodworking/handyman programs, hell, even the BBC so the Blackadder fans aren't even cheated.
The free market has eliminated the need for a government program. It's a conservative's dream. Only problem is that the government program won't give it up.
I am smart enough to know when I'm seeing an old Boston Pops show.
And, the Brit tv shows are also very old. What have they been doing with all the money they've received to date? Obviously, it's not gone into new programming. FV
*UPDATE* http://www.apts.org/html/whatsnew/Senate_FY04_Subcommittee.htm
APTS, NPR, CPB and PBS Applaud Senate Funding for Public Broadcasting
On June 25, the Senate Subcommittee on Labor, HHS, and Education Appropriations endorsed $400 million in advance appropriations for the Corporation for Public Broadcasting (CPB) in fiscal year 2006. It also recommended that $55 million in "new" money be specifically targeted to the digital conversion and $10 million for the first phase of interconnection for fiscal year 2004.
Public broadcasting applauds the Senate action, as it offers vital support for public broadcasting in its mission to provide quality educational programming and services to the American public. The funding proposed by the Senate will contribute significantly to the efforts of more than 1,000 locally owned public television and radio stations as they translate exciting new technologies into valuable learning tools for every home, school and workplace.
The Senate levels are particularly welcome as they exceed earlier recommendations by the Administration and the House Labor, HHS and Education Appropriations Subcommittee. While the Senate's action is an important step, differences in the final two bills passed in the House and Senate will have to be settled in a joint conference later this year.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.