That last line: "Senator. For the good of your party -- and your state -- make the call now," should read: "Senator. For the good of your party -- and The State -- make the call now."
To: The Anti-Democrat
The desperation among 'journalists' is palpable.
To: The Anti-Democrat
Wow that's pretty desperate to be publishing that in a publicly-available newspaper.
3 posted on
06/22/2003 5:08:44 AM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Road Map = Road Kill)
To: The Anti-Democrat
![](http://www.ourcampaigns.com/images/candidates/Candidate306.jpg)
"HOOOOleymackadeah -- Dere be, I say, dere be a WHOOOOOLE lotta editorializing goin' on heah!"
4 posted on
06/22/2003 5:23:25 AM PDT by
martin_fierro
(A v v n c v l v s M a x i m v s)
To: The Anti-Democrat
Good point. Hollings is a major league loser and should step down. I'm tired of his rants and raves, which are even more disrespectable on a man of his age. SC needs another rock solid conservative like Lindsay Graham as Senator. This is an excellent pick-up opportunity for the GOP and I really hope Hollings steps down.
To: The Anti-Democrat
MESSAGE TO SOUTH CAROLINA (AND OTHER) DEMOCRATS:
Accept defeat and get interested in something else (try golf or stamp collecting).
You have nothing to offer.
The opposition party has everything to offer, and it is lead by the greatest American president since Lincoln and the greatest world statesman since Winston Churchill, surrounded by the smartest, most highly ethical, best educated, most capable, and most visionary advisors in history--and there are many more waiting in the wings.
Face it. You Democrats (and all your decadence and self-serving parasitism) are things of the past (and good riddance).
8 posted on
06/22/2003 6:13:35 AM PDT by
Savage Beast
(Vote Democrat! Vote for national--and personal--suicide! It's like being a suicide bomber!)
To: The Anti-Democrat
![](http://bulldogbulletin.lhhosting.com/images/USA-09.gif)
Thanks for posting that whine. It gives me great pleasure to see such public flailing about from the Dems and their sympathizers. The poor bootlicker was clearly *begging* for Fritz to be a Party man, clearly not understanding that the Democratic Party is not about Party (or even ideas) any longer, but about Personality (as in: Cult of).
13 posted on
06/22/2003 8:43:12 AM PDT by
Southack
(Media bias means that Castro won't be punished for Cuban war crimes against Black Angolans in Africa)
To: Pubbie; JohnnyZ; Theodore R.; Nathaniel Fischer; AuH2ORepublican; LdSentinal; Kuksool; Coop; ...
![](http://eem.imagenet2000.com/wng_list/chat/fogheads.gif)
'Rats/liberal media having a hissy over Senator Foghorn's indecision *ping*...
16 posted on
06/22/2003 9:15:48 AM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(~Remember, it's not sporting to fire at RINO until charging~)
To: The Anti-Democrat
LOL- pathetic. DeMint will win whether old-man Hollings runs again or not. It's sad to see the media disgrace itself with this kind of partisanship.
To: The Anti-Democrat
{state Superintendent of Education Inez Tenenbaum leading the likely Republican nominee, U.S. Rep. Jim DeMint....Tenenbaum did slightly better, winning 45 percent to DeMint's 33 percent}
45% is the most a RAT would receive in SC. Last year, Lindsey Graham (GOP) beat Alex Sanders (RAT) for the US Senate 54-44. Mark Sanford (GOP) knocked off Jim Hodges (RAT) for the Governorship 53-45. I doubt Tenenbaum would be getting anything higher than 45% in a presidential year with Bush being on the top of the ticket. South Carolina has become a hostile place for RATS.
19 posted on
06/22/2003 1:36:06 PM PDT by
Kuksool
To: The Anti-Democrat
I love how this writer assumes that Democrats winning is automatically good for South Carolina. Seeing as a big majority of SCarolina voted for Bush, does that mean this writer thinks that the voters went against their best interests? Don't answer, I already know.
20 posted on
06/22/2003 1:39:46 PM PDT by
votelife
(FREE MIGUEL ESTRADA!)
To: The Anti-Democrat
23 posted on
06/23/2003 3:20:04 AM PDT by
Impy
(Sharpton/Byrd 2004!! The Slave/Massa Ticket!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson