Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

New TV Outrage - A New Low For TV:
Parent Television Council ^ | Parent Television Council

Posted on 06/20/2003 6:04:02 PM PDT by webber

New TV Outrage - A New Low For TV:

YOUR IMMEDIATE HELP NEEDED TO DRIVE THIS GROSSLY INDECENT GARBAGE OFF TV AND OUT OF OUR HOMES...

First, we apologize to you in advance for asking you to read the filth below.  WARNING: it's EXTREMELY offensive. 

DON'T LET ANY CHILDREN READ THIS E-MAIL!

But millions of children were already exposed to it on TV, and you need to know how totally sick some TV shows marketed to children have become.

Here's what millions of impressionable youngsters across America who tuned in to the new Fox-TV show, "Keen Eddie," were subjected to last Tuesday evening (June 10) --

The plot involved a case about black market traffic in horse semen.  Detective Eddie hired a prostitute (whose ad in the newspaper read, "Forty Year Old Filthy Slut. Will Do Anything") to have sex with a horse!!!

FILE YOUR FORMAL INDECENCY COMPLAINT AGAINST THE JUNE 10, 2003 EPISODE OF FOX-TV's "KEEN EDDIE" WITH THE FEDERAL COMMUNICATIONS COMMISSION (FCC) NOW!

This is what you letter to the FCC will look like:


To: Federal Communications Commission
(FCC), Washington, D.C.

Michael K. Powell, Chairman
Kathleen Q. Abernathy
Jonathan S. Adelstein
Michael J. Copps
Kevin J. Martin

RE:   OFFICIAL FCC TELEVISION INDECENCY COMPLAINT:

This is a formal COMPLAINT of indecency on broadcast television. My complaint concerns the PROGRAM ON:
NETWORK:  FOX-TV
PROGRAM TITLE:  "Keen Eddie"
BROADCAST DATE: June 10, 2003
BROADCAST TIME:  9:00 PM Eastern & Pacific Time, 8:00 PM Central & Mountain Time

Documentation of the indecent material on which my COMPLAINT is based is provided below.  A video tape of this entire episode of "Keen Eddie" is available from the Parents Television Council. PLEASE KEEP ME INFORMED OF THE PROGRESS AND RESULTS OF YOUR INVESTIGATION INTO THIS MATTER.

COMPLAINANT believes that this material is in context and fully representative of the show's overall tone and quality.

COMPLAINANT also declares that such material is:

The FCC should exercise its responsibility to enforce the existing law against indecency on broadcast TV between the hours of 6 a.m. and 10 p.m. (Title 18, U.S. Code, Section 1464) by levying severe sanctions against the broadcasters of this program.

PLEASE KEEP ME INFORMED OF THE PROGRESS AND RESULTS OF YOUR INVESTIGATION INTO THIS MATTER. SYNOPSIS, June 10, 2003 EPISODE OF "Keen Eddie"

The plot involved a case about black market traffic in horse semen.  Detective Eddie hired a prostitute (whose ad in the newspaper read, "Forty Year Old Filthy Slut. Will Do Anything") to have sex with a horse.

When the prostitute showed up at the stable, Keen Eddie's thugs asked her to have sexual intercourse with a horse because they needed its semen. 

Actual dialogue:

Prostitute: --No, that's not natural.
Thug: --------Extraction for insemination. If you look at the picture on  page 45 you'll see how natural it is...
Prostitute: --Forget it!
Another Thug: --You're a 40-year old filthy slut, you'll do anything...
Prostitute: --With a human...

The prostitute finally agrees to go through with it.  She goes to the stable and attempts to arouse the horse, but the horse drops dead. 

She explains, "I never laid a finger on it.  I lifted up my blouse, that's all… he needs to get aroused.  I happen to know a little something on this subject."


CLICK HERE TO SUBMIT YOUR PROTEST TO ALL 5 FCC COMMISSIONERS

A copy of this COMPLAINT will be sent in your name to Gateway, Subway, Pier 1 and Nissan as a sponsor of this program, with the following message:


I am outraged at the frightening increase in violence, sex, filth, smutty humor and coarse language on prime-time television. TV shows have been poisoned by a flood of offensive material that is helping destroy family values and seriously harming America's children and grandchildren… and SPONSORS LIKE YOU ARE PAYING FOR IT WITH YOUR ADVERTISING DOLLARS!

In particular, TV was poisoned by the June 10, 2003 episode of "Keen Eddie" aired on Fox-TV and sponsored by {name of sponsor}.

As a consumer, I am taking part in this grassroots campaign organized by the Parents Television Council (PTC) to urge you and all commercial TV Sponsors to STOP USING YOUR ADVERTISING DOLLARS TO UNDERWRITE THE FILTH AND VIOLENCE THAT IS POISONING THE MINDS OF MILLIONS OF IMPRESSIONABLE YOUNGSTERS.

I hope and expect to hear from the PTC that {name of sponsor} has adopted a new and more responsible advertising policy that will preclude sponsorship of any program containing material as indecent as that featured in the June 10 broadcast of "Keen Eddie."

Sincerely,

Your Name


 

Call or Send a snail mail to the commissioners: Federal Communications Commission
445 12th Street SW
Washington, DC 20554
Phone: 888-CALL-FCC (225-5322)
TTY: 888-TELL-FCC (835-5322)
Fax: 202-418-0232


  1. Go to Complaint To FCC and sign the formal indecency complaint to the FCC (Federal Communications Commission) against this "Keen Eddie" broadcast.  The FCC is supposed to enforce the federal law against broadcast TV indecency during children's viewing hours.  Please help us flood the FCC with complaints about this "Keen Eddie" atrocity.

  2. When you sign the FCC complaint, the PTC will also generate on your behalf a WARNING TO SPONSORS addressed to four of the national advertisers whose commercial dollars paid to air this show on Fox-TV.  Your warning alerts Gateway Computers, Subway Restaurants, Pier 1 and Nissan Motor Company that you are shocked at their irresponsibility in paying for such filth-filled content.

  3. ALSO VERY IMPORTANT -- FORWARD THIS E-MAIL TO YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY NOW SO THEY CAN JOIN THE FIGHT.

Fox-TV's descent into this moral sewer was paid for by the sponsors who bought commercial time on this show.  

They include companies like Gateway, Subway, Pier 1 and Nissan -- all nationally-known brands that want to be  perceived as friends of the American family.

How can they allow their commercial dollars to pay for polluting our homes with graphic filth like this?  Whether these companies intended it or not, this kind of content directly violates the moral standards of decent families, especially those with young children. 

When TV Sponsors advertise on shows containing content like this -- whether it's bestiality and foul language on "Keen Eddie," or the  barrage of ultra-violence and references to oral sex, threesomes, masturbation and homosexuality documented by the PTC on other prime-time broadcast network shows -- we must hold the sponsors accountable for attempting to destroy our children's and grandchildren's moral values and character.

Moreover, your official indecency complaint to the FCC will support our campaign to demand that the FCC investigate, fine, and possibly pull station licenses of the Fox-TV affiliates who aired this "Keen Eddie" show.

And, hopefully, many of your friends and family will also forward this e-mail, so the FCC INDECENCY COMPLAINT and WARNING TO SPONSORS will be multiplied many, many times over!

We need you and a lot of other decent folks to take immediate action. Please don't delay.


With urgent thanks,

Parents Television Council


P.S. Go now to FCC INDECENCY COMPLAINT to file your FCC INDECENCY COMPLAINT and to generate your WARNING TO SPONSORS.  This is how, TOGETHER WITH YOU, the Parents Television Council will stop the flood of filth, depravity, foul language and sick, ultra-violence on TV: overwhelming grass roots pressure brought to bear on one network, one show, and one sponsor at a time.

Also-PLEASE FORWARD THIS TO YOUR FRIENDS AND FAMILY NOW SO THEY CAN JOIN THE FIGHT. 

Thank you.

Parent Television Council


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Announcements; Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 561-572 next last
To: StupidQuestions
You seem full of passionate intensity!

Perhaps we should censor her.

101 posted on 06/20/2003 7:54:43 PM PDT by DAnconia55
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 99 | View Replies]

To: Physicist
Hmmm.....Ah......Ummmm...2 ,NO 3! Damn!

Can I use a lifeline Regis?
102 posted on 06/20/2003 7:55:00 PM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus, Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

Comment #103 Removed by Moderator

To: webber
Bump
104 posted on 06/20/2003 7:59:10 PM PDT by apackof2 (If posted my comment would look like this)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn-of-Rohan
YOUR ARGUMENT IS A CHEAP COP OUT. And this doesn't just go for KIDS either.

Ive watched three episodes of the show in question and there was nothing else that I can recall that makes the show different from any other show on at night.

And what kind of parent are you if you dont know that Fox is known for its sleazy programming. They market to people like me, not to your kids so do your parental thing and take control.

105 posted on 06/20/2003 7:59:48 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: mhking; webber
I think one critical point has been largely overlooked in this thread's debate: the FCC's verbatim determination of what constitutes indecency. If this show fits the definition and its broadcast time falls between 6 a.m. and 10 p.m., then the PTC complaint would seem to be warranted. Naysayers, on the other hand, could also go directly to the FCC to get the rule changed.

FCC Indecent Broadcast Restrictions

The FCC has defined broadcast indecency as "language or material that, in context, depicts or describes, in terms patently offensive as measured by contemporary community broadcast standards for the broadcast medium, sexual or excretory organs or activities." Indecent programming contains patently offensive sexual or excretory references that do not rise to the level of obscenity. As such, the courts have held that indecent material is protected by the First Amendment and cannot be banned entirely. It may, however, be restricted in order to avoid its broadcast during times of the day when there is a reasonable risk that children may be in the audience.

Consistent with a federal statute and federal court decisions interpreting the indecency statute, the Commission adopted a rule pursuant to which broadcasts -- both on television and radio -- that fit within the indecency definition and that are aired between 6:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. are subject to indecency enforcement action.

106 posted on 06/20/2003 8:00:08 PM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: webber
You really are a piece of work - comparisons to Hilter, lame accusations of 'Pro-Infanticide' etc... That, my friend, is not only ignorant, but the minute you brought the Hitler Analogy into the argument, you lost...

Turn off the TV and get your kids a Barnes and Noble Reader's Advantage Card...
107 posted on 06/20/2003 8:00:16 PM PDT by Chad Fairbanks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn-of-Rohan
It goes for anyone, no matter young, middle or old age, who have a RIGHT TO BE FREE FROM this crap.

Please show me where that right is ennumerated.

108 posted on 06/20/2003 8:00:46 PM PDT by mhking
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: ffusco
The solution IMHO would be to have a more reponsible body politic. . .

Ergo, Free Republic.com

109 posted on 06/20/2003 8:01:51 PM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: mhking
But it is not YOUR place to tell me what my child can and cannot watch. I am the parent of my children, and I will make that decision, thank you very much.

If a parent wants his 4 year old child to watch hard-core porn, would that be all-right with you?

110 posted on 06/20/2003 8:02:32 PM PDT by FreeReign (V5.0 Enterprise Edition<P>Answer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: webber
I'm surprised to see so many Freepers here defend this type of programming. Surely you can turn off the TV. Surely you can prevent your kids from watching it (can you really?). And surely there's freedom of speech. But that's not the point. The point is our declining values and standards, signs of a declining culture.
111 posted on 06/20/2003 8:02:40 PM PDT by Mihalis (The French boycott continues)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: webber
Not only that, but if nobody complains to the FCC or advertisers about such filth, they will think they have the green light to continue, and eventually this is all you will see on TV. Is that what they really want? An Expensive TV that they bought that they can't turn on?

Then, why dont you sell your TV set or just buy a complete collection of Disney tapes and play them night after night until your kids graduate high school.

112 posted on 06/20/2003 8:03:31 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn-of-Rohan
If you want "new engineers", start your own network and let the market decide if it's worth watching.
113 posted on 06/20/2003 8:03:34 PM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: DAnconia55
"Perhaps we should censor her."

I agree. That poetry thing was over the top.


114 posted on 06/20/2003 8:04:43 PM PDT by kcar (T)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies]

To: Eowyn-of-Rohan
Now I know why you are supporting government thugs telling people what you can watch on TV. That's the biggest piece of projection I've seen in years.
115 posted on 06/20/2003 8:04:44 PM PDT by Dan from Michigan ("Say goodnite to da Bad Guy" - Tony Montana)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: rhema
D'accordo.

"I concur"
116 posted on 06/20/2003 8:04:53 PM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus, Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 109 | View Replies]

To: Mihalis
Some people treat symptoms and not the disease.
117 posted on 06/20/2003 8:06:16 PM PDT by ffusco (Maecilius Fuscus, Governor of Longovicium , Manchester, England. 238-244 AD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: Sonny M
"what if you don't watch it, your kids don't watch it, but the kids in your childs class do, and decide to re-enact the dialogue and the scene with your child at play time."

Your child can't live in a bubble. This kind of thing is going to happen.
118 posted on 06/20/2003 8:06:17 PM PDT by LanPB01
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: FreeReign
What is the alternative? Should government minders be in every home to be certain every parent conforms to minimum standards? I'd rather let the parent educate his 4-year old his way than the alternative.
119 posted on 06/20/2003 8:06:40 PM PDT by StupidQuestions
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies]

To: Mihalis
I'm surprised to see so many Freepers here defend this type of programming.

There's an awful lot of stuff I dislike that I would just as soon NOT see the Federal government called in to suppress by force of law. If that's what you mean by "defending", then don't be so surprised.

120 posted on 06/20/2003 8:06:41 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 81-100101-120121-140 ... 561-572 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson