Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

White House edits global warming report
AP ^ | Thursday, June 19, 2003

Posted on 06/20/2003 1:56:16 PM PDT by presidio9

Edited on 04/29/2004 2:02:42 AM PDT by Jim Robinson. [history]

The White House directed a major rewrite of an assessment of climate change, removing references to health and environmental risks posed by rising global temperatures, according to internal draft documents made public Thursday.

Several Senate Democrats, including some running for president, accused the White House of "doctoring" the Environmental Protection Agency report to suit President Bush's skeptical views on global warming.


(Excerpt) Read more at cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: epa; globalwarming; globalwarminghoax
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

1 posted on 06/20/2003 1:56:16 PM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9
So the people who edit information to serve political purposes for a living are criticizing others for a similar perceived slight?
2 posted on 06/20/2003 1:57:58 PM PDT by RAT Patrol (Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RAT Patrol
And EPA isn't a political animal ?
3 posted on 06/20/2003 2:00:42 PM PDT by Eric in the Ozarks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Well, well. We're not only getting rid of Christie Todd-Whitman (long overdue), we're also going to correct/ammend the junk science. Good good good.
4 posted on 06/20/2003 2:02:08 PM PDT by EggsAckley ( "Aspire to Mediocracy"..........new motto for publik skools....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
"Global warming is true regardless of whether or not there is evidence."
5 posted on 06/20/2003 2:02:09 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
If the AP report characterizes this accurately, this was a dumb move by the White House.

Of course, that's a big "if."

6 posted on 06/20/2003 2:02:44 PM PDT by The Hon. Galahad Threepwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Can we edit out the words "rain forest" and insert the words "unkempt jungles"?
7 posted on 06/20/2003 2:05:51 PM PDT by theDentist (So. This is Virginia.... where are all the virgins?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9; *Global Warming Hoax; Stand Watch Listen; RightWhale; Free the USA; Carry_Okie; ...
Global Warming Hoax :

To find all articles tagged or indexed using Global Warming Hoax , click below:
  click here >>> Global Warming Hoax <<< click here  
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here)



8 posted on 06/20/2003 2:06:21 PM PDT by Ernest_at_the_Beach (Iran Mullahs will feel the heat from our Iraq victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
"Global warming is true regardless of whether or not there is evidence."

Riiiight.

Did I ever tell you about the time I invented the internet?

9 posted on 06/20/2003 2:18:12 PM PDT by presidio9 (RUN AL, RUN!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
It used to known as the "global warming theory" The "theory" somehow was dropped a couple years ago. Wonder how that happened, since there's still serious debate amongst scientist whether there's anything going on
that hasn't gone on for thousands for years?
10 posted on 06/20/2003 2:18:29 PM PDT by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Editing has cleaned up the environment,which is all it ever needed in the first place!
11 posted on 06/20/2003 2:19:42 PM PDT by INSENSITIVE GUY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Thane_Banquo
By the way, was that a joke?
12 posted on 06/20/2003 2:20:56 PM PDT by nuconvert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
the climate section "no longer accurately represents scientific consensus on climate change,"

There is no scientific consensus, although there is a political consensus. Smogbag ecotopists are riding this bangtail way too hard; she's not going to finish the race.

13 posted on 06/20/2003 2:25:57 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
It was funny when the greenhouse gases actually helping to produce plantlife in the deserts. The gases were actually helping the enviroment instead of hurting it!
14 posted on 06/20/2003 2:47:52 PM PDT by BushCountry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Kinda like thier new policy on not releasing any unemployment information unless it's good news.

Peculiar.
15 posted on 06/20/2003 2:48:15 PM PDT by taxed2death (A few billion here, a few trillion there...we're all friends right?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxed2death
like thier new policy on not releasing any unemployment information unless it's good news

Who is 'thier'? What policy? Unemployment reports are being issued by all depts right on schedule as always.

16 posted on 06/20/2003 2:54:17 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Why is everybody getting so uptight about this REPORT?? It's not a legal document - it's just a report. We edited the ENVIRONMENTAL WHACKO report and make it more user friendly.
17 posted on 06/20/2003 3:02:12 PM PDT by CyberAnt ( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
I was being sarcastic. I forgot the < /sarcasm > tag.
18 posted on 06/20/2003 3:14:56 PM PDT by Thane_Banquo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
>>The changes initially were reported in Thursday's New York Times. <<

So it must be true then...
19 posted on 06/20/2003 3:18:13 PM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
>>EPA spokesman Joe Martyak said the agency "didn't want to hold up the rest of the report" because of the disagreement over the climate language and because there remains no clear "consensus on the science and conclusions" on global warming. <<

That alone justifies the deletion.
20 posted on 06/20/2003 3:19:24 PM PDT by RobRoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-33 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson