Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Day care operator accused of having sex with 14-year-old boy
ktrk ^

Posted on 06/20/2003 11:40:28 AM PDT by chance33_98

Day care operator accused of having sex with 14-year-old boy


Mandy Skarpa is accused of having consensual sex with a 14-year-old boy.

By Andy Cerota ABC13 Eyewitness News

(6/19/03 - ROSENBERG) — A Rosenberg woman who runs a day care out of her home has been charged with indecency involving a teenage boy. Now it's up to the Fort Bend County Sheriff's Department to investigate, but she's married to one of their own.

Although her husband works for the Fort Bend County Sheriff's Department, Mandy Skarpa's husband is not involved in the investigation at all.

Neighbors describe her as a good woman and a good mother. With regards to the allegations that have been brought to light, it's the last thing they say they ever expected.

"I'm just shocked at her, because, I mean, I thought she was a good friend and a good neighbor," said Glenda Toll. "You know, so I'm just amazed."

Toll says she was stunned after learning that Skarpa, her 38-year-old neighbor, was arrested for allegedly having sex with a teenager -- a 14-year-old boy believed to be someone she knew very well.

"I had all the faith and trust. Matter of fact, she even kept my kids overnight one night. I'm just shocked," Toll told Eyewitness News.

Skarpa is out of jail, but her troubles are far from over. The allegations she's faced with could cost her her license as a day care provider, which means Children's Protective Services could shut down the center which she's run from her home for years.

Fort Bend County Sheriff's Department Chief Craig Brady said, "We have no information that indicates that she was doing anything inappropriate while there were any other young people around. Most of the activities have taken place after the day care clients have gone home"

Authorities arrested Skarpa on June 11, after being tipped off about the alleged relationship. Investigators say Skarpa and the teen have known each other for some time, and got together on numerous occasions at several different locations.

"So far the investigation indicates that it was consensual. However, legally a 14-year-old cannot consent," explained Chief Brady.

Neighbors who've known Skarpa and her family for years are having a tough time believing the allegations.

"I would doubt seriously that would happen," said Bill Fox. "Number one, there are too many people there, always. How would she find time to have an inappropriate relationship?"

Officials with Children's Protective Services tell Eyewitness News that Skarpa has voluntarily shut down her day care center which has been in operation since 1991. Authorities are still investigating the allegations. Once the investigation is complete, the charges will likely be referred to a grand jury.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; US: Texas
KEYWORDS: ageofconsent; ageofconsentlaws; daycareoperator; fortbend; ftbend; houston; itsjustsex; molestation; pedophile; statutoryrape; teensex; texas
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last
Comment #21 Removed by Moderator

To: Reaganwuzthebest; najida
"What is even more twisted is that boys aren't as mature emotionally at 14 as girls."

And the girls know it too. When I was that age they all wanted the older guys.

Also not a mature physically either.

22 posted on 06/20/2003 12:13:31 PM PDT by Paleo Conservative (Do not remove this tag under penalty of law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: vin-one
When I went though my divorce my son was 14.  You've never seen manipulation, until you watch your wife's buds flirt with a fourteen year old to manipulate him into backing his mother's positions, with the idea that if he just plays along he can remain 'close to the sexpot'.  While I'm not intimating that anything actually happened, yet I'm not 100% sure of that, I saw for myself what was happening and new exactly what they were trying to accomplish.

It was so prominent that my son felt guilty about it even ten years after the events.  One of the women was married which caused all sorts of moral internal conflicts with my son who was good friends with the woman's husband.  At one point after I was sufficiently out of the picture, she cut the flirtation off cold turkey.  Once again, this only served to make my son feel all the guiltier, as if it had only been his fault all along.  Some of it was.  Most of it wasn't.  He was being manipulated.  And at that age I'm not about to place the blame solely on him.

One day my son came to me and talked about this incident ten years after the fact.  He appologized for letting one of these people manipulate him.  He also explained what had taken place.  I'm still not confident he felt comfortable enough to spill it all.

Anyone that thinks men are the only leacherous group should rethink the issue.

I don't think women understand how much they screw young men up by acting this way.  Heaping endless praise on the young man in groups and flirting with them individually when you're married can come to no good end.

23 posted on 06/20/2003 12:18:36 PM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Also not a mature physically either.

Yeah and it didn't hurt to be a football star either lol. That counted me out.

24 posted on 06/20/2003 12:19:11 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
It should be different - its just not the same crime.
25 posted on 06/20/2003 12:22:43 PM PDT by SarahW
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
...a 14-year-old boy believed to be someone she knew very well.

Well, I think that that goes without saying.

26 posted on 06/20/2003 12:24:25 PM PDT by Redcloak (All work and no FReep makes Jack a dull boy. All work and no FReep make s Jack a dul boy. Allwork an)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: gathersnomoss
I've known two guys who were inappropriately exposed to sex at an early age. One by a female teacher, the other by a male. They are both sex addicts as adults, and yes, the latter one is gay.

To say that because it is a male it doesn't matter is soooo wrong.
27 posted on 06/20/2003 12:26:46 PM PDT by Clintons Are White Trash (Helen Thomas, Molly Ivins, Maureen Dowd - The Axis of Ugly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Tai_Chung
Not to belittle the seriousness of the charge, but why would an "allegation" cost her her license?

Good question. You will surely be excoriated for asking it.

28 posted on 06/20/2003 12:27:15 PM PDT by Protagoras (Putting government in charge of morality is like putting pedophiles in charge of children.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
"So far the investigation indicates that it was consensual. However, legally a 14-year-old cannot consent,"

This cop should win the Clintonian Speech award. Translated, "I want to cover this up for my buddy in the Sherrifs Office".
29 posted on 06/20/2003 12:28:07 PM PDT by over3Owithabrain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: The_Victor
Did you see the picture of the woman on the top of the page?
30 posted on 06/20/2003 12:28:48 PM PDT by Honcho
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SarahW
It should be different - its just not the same crime.

And I agree with you to a point, it's the girl who gets pregnant. Add to the fact males can more easily intimidate the female physically, even into consensual relations. But this woman should still have to pay some price, there's no guarantee he won't grow up emotionally scarred.

31 posted on 06/20/2003 12:32:24 PM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: najida
Ya...I agree...kinda show how bright we are...
32 posted on 06/20/2003 12:33:37 PM PDT by joesnuffy (Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Honcho
Did you see the picture of the woman on the top of the page?

Yes, but I think that's her mug shot. But at 14, I doubt it would have mattered to me.

33 posted on 06/20/2003 12:37:02 PM PDT by The_Victor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: HELLRAISER II
Amen...
34 posted on 06/20/2003 12:59:32 PM PDT by SoDak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: chance33_98
-- a 14-year-old boy believed to be someone she knew very well.

Gee, do ya think?

35 posted on 06/20/2003 1:00:38 PM PDT by Wolfie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stephanie Kutzner
Boys and girls are just different as is the sexual act. Men are those who are penetrating - not the woman. He probably had his fun and will continue to grow up without mental damages.

So true...boys at 14 think about sex 24/7.

36 posted on 06/20/2003 1:10:29 PM PDT by demlosers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
It was so prominent that my son felt guilty about it even ten years after the events. One of the women was married which caused all sorts of moral internal conflicts

Abuse is abuse, and manipulation is manipulation. Anyone who believes a 14 year old boy has no emotions to protect has no clue. This pedophile needs to be locked up with all the others, she used this child for her jollies ---just like other pedophiles.

37 posted on 06/20/2003 1:19:47 PM PDT by FITZ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: najida
Yes we're cracking jokes and yes we said exactly what we would've said at the time, but we also realize that it's wrong just as well as you do now.
38 posted on 06/20/2003 1:28:10 PM PDT by HELLRAISER II
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: HELLRAISER II
Thanks :)
39 posted on 06/20/2003 1:33:38 PM PDT by najida (What handbasket? And where did you say we were going?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: HELLRAISER II
She gets pregnant, he is legally obligated to provide child support till the other child reaches 18 atleast.
40 posted on 06/20/2003 1:44:49 PM PDT by Fpimentel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-60 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson