Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Upper-Middle-Class Dropouts
Forbes ^ | 6/23/03 | Rich Karlgaard

Posted on 06/19/2003 8:04:02 PM PDT by technochick99

The Smith family--yep, like Jayson Blair, I'm making this up--lives in Redwood City, 20 miles south of San Francisco and on the northern edge of what is known as Silicon Valley. The head of the household, John, works as a software coder at Sun Microsystems. He's a good coder but not a superstar on the level of Sun's cofounder, the legendary Bill Joy. John Smith makes $95,000 a year, which sounds plentiful to most Americans. In truth, it doesn't go too far in Silicon Valley, where the cost of a modest 1,900-square-foot house with three bedrooms and one and a half baths crowded onto an 8,000-square-foot lot is--hold your breath!--$786,000. But that's the house where John, his wife, Rosa, and their two children live.

Rosa met John at Sun, back in the early 1990s. She was a newly minted English major writing brochure copy for $38,000 a year; John was making $80,000. After marrying, John and Rosa's combined income was $118,000, plus bonuses. With one child on the way, that was a pretty good sum.

Even better financial conditions lay ahead for the Smiths. After Sun's stock started on its rocket ride during the late 1990s, John's options were worth $360,000. Wisely, in 1999 he and Rosa decided to exercise and sell half their options, using the aftertax $142,000 of their capital gains proceeds as a down payment on their first home in Redwood City. They purchased it for $420,000, which left a mortgage of $278,000. With John's $80,000 base salary (not counting bonuses that averaged $40,000 a year--an amount equivalent to the salary of Rosa, who had quit her job upon learning she was pregnant again), monthly payments were a snap.

Good times rolled for John and Rosa Smith. A second child arrived, and so did job opportunities for John. He weighed offers from software giant Oracle, as well as from three dot-coms--two of which were backed by brand-name venturecapital firms and looked like sure bets to do an IPO and make their early employees rich. This was a heady experience. John decided to stay put because Sun kicked up his base salary to $95,000. John's boss at Sun also granted John more options, a six-week sabbatical and more flex time. Now that was a package!

John felt like a master of the universe! Every employer inSilicon Valley wanted him. He was calling his own shots. The money was pouring in. The Smiths were almost millionaires--on paper, anyway. It was time to trade up to an executive-style house. Time to apply to a private golf club. Time to think about private schooling for their oldest daughter, Kirstin, now 5.

Slide Down the Matterhorn

Sun's stock peaked at $65 in September 2000--six months after the Nasdaq stock composite index peaked at 5031--and the Smith family's paper worth climbed to more than $1 million. John felt like a million bucks. When Sun's stock sagged to $40 in November, he wasn't too worried. The Smiths were in good shape. John's weighted average option strike price at Sun was, after all, $22. The Smith family's paper net worth might not have been $1 million anymore, but it was easily three-quarters of that, counting their home. Thus buoyed, John flew his family (business class) to Italy, where they enjoyed their six-week sabbatical, and spent $45,000.

But Sun's stock kept falling. And falling. It fell so fast that John and Rosa felt paralyzed and missed the opportunity to exercise their options and sell. When Sun's stock fell below John's weighted average strike price of $22 in early 2001, John realized that his Sun paper wealth had vanished. Another type of compensation also vanished later that year--John's bonus. Sun suspended bonuses in 2001, and again in 2002. By then, the company's stock price was hovering around $3.

The Smiths were lucky in two respects. They had their home. And John still had his job, with its $95,000 income. But now this income had to support the entire Smith family concern. Out of the $95,000 had to come the money for taxes, food, clothing, the monthly mortgage, insurance, preschool payments and vacations. Reluctantly, the Smiths put Kirstin in public school. The closest the Smiths came to Italy in 2002--and again in 2003--was a wet slide down the Matterhorn ride at Disneyland. The Toyota Sienna minivan that propelled the Smiths to Disneyland was paid for, but it had 107,000 miles on it and smelled like sour milk.

At work, John no longer feels like a master of the universe. He feels lucky to have his job. He suddenly feels like a commodity, and he doesn't like that feeling one bit. During the last three years, thousands of software jobs like John's have migrated to Bangalore, India. John is so worried about his job that he doesn't take the flex time promised to him. He doesn't sleep well. After two hours of coding at work, the trapezius muscles connecting his neck to his shoulders feel as hard as cast iron. He would like to go for a sauna and a massage, but the $95 that costs would blow the Smith's weekly budget.

The Smiths have dropped out of the upper middle class. Should we feel sorry for them? To be a middle-middle-class American in the early 21st century is to occupy the 99.99 percentile of human existence, in terms of nutrition, wealth and ease. But the Smiths don't feel that way. For a few years in the late 1990s the Smiths had tasted something better. They were upper middle class, or at least close enough to feel like it. They miss that. They are frustrated. They want back in.

Millions of American families are just like the Smiths. Politicians, take heed. The Smiths will decide the election of 2004.


TOPICS: Business/Economy
KEYWORDS: economy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last
To: opbuzz
Whatever you think of them, (and for whatever reasons), the last line of this article in Forbes is worth repeating:

"Millions of American families are just like the Smiths. Politicians, take heed. The Smiths will decide the election of 2004."
21 posted on 06/19/2003 8:41:44 PM PDT by LibertyAndJusticeForAll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
He would like to go for a sauna and a massage, but the $95 that costs would blow the Smith's weekly budget.

Poor baby!

22 posted on 06/19/2003 8:53:55 PM PDT by Samwise (There are other forces at work in this world, Frodo, besides the will of evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #23 Removed by Moderator

To: Fishing-guy
California housing in desirable areas attracts a global clientel. That's why.
24 posted on 06/19/2003 8:57:23 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Fishing-guy
Because at least 52% of California land is owned by state and federal governments, and they don't let people live on it. Less land available to build, higher home prices. Areas with the highest prices have greenbelts, scenic viewsheds and land trusts that drive up the price of buildable land.

Every development that gets built in almost every California city has to have so many low income houses as well. This drives up the price for the poor sods paying retail. In Salinas, CA, the city council is about to pass a law that for every development ok'd by the planning department %40 of the houses have to be low income. That is a whopping percentage don't you think?

The socialists running the government in Santa Cruz County CA have come up with a devious way to raise the cost of housing. For individual builders, if you want to build a new home you have to upgrade the plumbing(install low flow toilets, showerheads) in enough of your NEIGHBORs houses so there is zero impact of your home on the water system. How many houses is that? For one builder, it was five homes. He had to pay for their plumbing upgrades. It added $7000 to the cost of his home.
25 posted on 06/19/2003 8:58:21 PM PDT by hedgetrimmer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: lelio
This has to be the most bizarre job market I've seen in years. The same big engineering firms in my area that are laying off some of their staff are also posting a bunch of "help wanted" ads in every professional journal I read.

It is still possible to make a decent living in this country. If you are good at what you do (almost regardless of what it is you do), then you will make a VERY good living.

Despite the soft job market, it's still damned near impossible to find a good young civil engineer these days.

26 posted on 06/19/2003 9:03:27 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
Cry me a frigging river.

At $95,000 a year he's still making more then a good 80% of his fellow Americans. Can't afford those $7-dollar a glass mochas and weekly $95-dollar rubdowns at a spa? Don't feel like the master of your cubicle farm? Welcome to the real world code-jockey.

27 posted on 06/19/2003 9:03:54 PM PDT by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
well I can't comment about civil engineering. But for IT, those job ads are a required part of the process to "comply" with the H1B law. No one will actually be hired for many of those jobs, its just a pro-forma ad, then the company can claim they tried to find a qualified american but could not, and had to hire a foreign worker at 40% of the wage level.
28 posted on 06/19/2003 9:07:18 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
that's why I said, this story is a poor example of what is really going on. they should have focused on people who actually lost their jobs, that's the real story.
29 posted on 06/19/2003 9:08:29 PM PDT by oceanview
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
There are plenty of H1B folks in civil engineering, but to be honest with you they are primarily involved in the "hi-tech" work that doesn't require much imagination. The young engineer who has good writing and speaking skills and who understands the business of consulting can practically name his price even in this job market.
30 posted on 06/19/2003 9:10:03 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
Being a literate techie is a good strategy. No doubt about it. Few can swing both ways.
31 posted on 06/19/2003 9:12:04 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
Right on !
32 posted on 06/19/2003 9:14:56 PM PDT by america-rules (I'm one proud American right now !)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Torie
Ironically, I don't look for "good" engineers when I hire recent graduates out of school. I'm more interested in someone who can have a conversation about anything except engineering, and who has a lot of practical experience doing other things. The best prospective engineer I ever interviewed was a part-time student who drove a bulldozer for a contractor while paying his way through school.
33 posted on 06/19/2003 9:16:48 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Alberta's Child
If you can combine literary, with technical skill, with an extrovert personality, you have a real winner. It is all about supply and demand. I make my living with being a cross dresser in the law, writing skills and finance and accounting. It makes up usually for my lack of charm, typically, at least enough to get to the beach.
34 posted on 06/19/2003 9:22:41 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Torie
If you can combine literary, with technical skill, with an extrovert personality, you have a real winner.

I hate to brag, but I think you just described me pretty accurately. LOL.

35 posted on 06/19/2003 9:24:23 PM PDT by Alberta's Child
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
Why do so many people insist on living near the coasts?

There exists in the heartland of this country, also known as "fly-over country," a great place to earn a living, buy a home and educate your children. I say this to all business-savvy Americans, move your business here and start over. You'll be glad you did it.

36 posted on 06/19/2003 9:25:24 PM PDT by sweetjane
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: oceanview
they should have focused on people who actually lost their jobs, that's the real story.

Actually, I think the real story is that perceptions will have a significant role in voting. Therefore, when there is fear in the air, even those in fear are "safe", and Bush does nothing about it, he may very well lose votes. In other words, it's not just the unemployed that the administration needs to worry about.

37 posted on 06/19/2003 9:29:27 PM PDT by technochick99 (Self defense is a basic human right. http://www.2ASisters.org julib@2asisters.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: technochick99
So will the tecno-bubble yearners go for a Dem to vent their frustration for the exposure of Camelot as an emperor with no clothes? I tend to doubt it. I suspect they will simply retool themselves, and get to work. Most of them are not into the blame game, and victimology.
38 posted on 06/19/2003 9:33:36 PM PDT by Torie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: FreedomCalls
Plenty of people have downsized before you.


A family of four in 1900 sqft, not a lot of room to downsize. Keep in mind this is a software engineer. This guy invested his time and money for himself, but also for our society.

It turns out the Priceline.com was not worth more than Delta, United, and USAir combined.


While I understand the excesses of the 90s, I'm glad it happened. We do have eBay, eTrade, PayPal (Some of these I would avoid), Amazon, Travelocity, CNN, Drudge, FR, DU, Hotmail, .... The explosion gave us choices and the best business models made it. The Y2K scare had much to do with driving the up the cost of IT labor too.

Yeah, we should have seen it coming. But when you see hundreds and thousands of jobs being outsourced, and CEOs taking pensions and 300 million dollar bonuses,its not a stretch to feel a little sorry for the loss of one's status. We need all the classes. If we lose one, the system will grow stale.

I personally think software engineers should earn enough to be part of the upper middle class. Geez, if engineers (of any type) don't qualify, who should? They don't just give those degrees away.
39 posted on 06/19/2003 9:55:01 PM PDT by KCmark (I am NOT a partisan.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Zeroisanumber
yeah he needs to suck it up. I used to get my nails done and hair done every week, and be a regular at Starbucks. I need to save money so I'm not splurging anymore.
40 posted on 06/19/2003 10:01:32 PM PDT by cyborg (I'm a mutt-american)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-100 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson