Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Mixed Premises: A Critique of Murray Rothbard’s “Sociology of the Ayn Rand Cult”
The Rational Argumentator ^ | June 18, 2003 | G. Stolyarov II

Posted on 06/19/2003 3:35:54 PM PDT by G. Stolyarov II

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last
To: RightWhale; rattrap
Well, as you can see, rattrap has posted some actual quotes from Rand herself concerning libertarianism. A couple of key points where Rand disagreed with libertarians are drugs and the gov't monopoly on force. Rand was totally against drugs. She argued that they ought to be outlawed (which they are). She had zero patience for anyone that would do drugs. Also, she believed that one of the government's few legitimate purposes was to maintain the monopoly on the use of force (ie maintain a military and police force). The way she saw it, if there were no police (and the framework of laws behind them) you would eventually be forced to shoot everybody that walked up to your door. Obviously, her arguments for this were more detailed- I have encapsulated them (imperfectly I might add) here to illustrate a point. Once she was even quoted as objecting to the very word "libertarian". She said it sounded like a "made up word".
61 posted on 06/20/2003 11:57:40 AM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
From what I understand ... ayn rand was an atheist --- doesn't this vaccuum just attract these sorts of people ?
62 posted on 06/20/2003 12:06:29 PM PDT by f.Christian (( I'm going to rechristen evolution, in honor of f.Christian, "shlockology"... HumanaeVitae ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
ayn rand was an atheist

Maybe, but she was totally opposed to leather-jacketed commie thugs.

63 posted on 06/20/2003 12:15:31 PM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
As far as I know this is true. I'm not sure I understand your question though. I'm not an atheist at any rate. Haven't made up my mind if you are or not. Does the "f" stand for "former"? Just a question.
64 posted on 06/20/2003 12:19:18 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Just a question

You make me laugh (( cry )) !

Try this ...

To: NMC EXP

To: FletcherC.

re: your #12

You are correct, the Republic is coming apart as we watch. God is patient. I am not.

Regards

J.R.

15 Posted on 05/03/2000 14:51:23 PDT by NMC EXP

To: NMC EXP

Still getting it wrong???

The demoncraps temporarilly have it from falling apart... but they will in the long run(elections) --- free-fall apart/down!

God will help them-their/desire-delusions!

16 Posted on >>>>>05/03/2000<<<<<< 15:31:43 PDT by FletcherC.

Pretty good prediction ... on the link back --- there will be a link to the original thread !

65 posted on 06/20/2003 12:29:29 PM PDT by f.Christian (( I'm going to rechristen evolution, in honor of f.Christian, "shlockology"... HumanaeVitae ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
What the hell are you talking about f.Christian?

This is the reason I never bother posting to you. Your posts read like something a bong smoking hippy would come up with. I have not the faintest clue what you wish to say or why you bother trying to communicate with these mad hieroglyphics of yours. It's kind of like having your portait done by Pablo Picasso.

If you're living in America- SPEAK ENGLISH! (and this means not just English words but complete sentences with verbs and proper punctuation). Why not just type in wing dings or write your posts in Spanish? You'd be making about as much sense if you did either or both. Lassie made more sense by barking to let her owners know that Timmie had fallen down a well.

At least publish some sort of guide so the rest of us can decipher what the ((schlock)) the various /// mean.

66 posted on 06/20/2003 1:02:03 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
You asked me what the f was for ... didn't that answer your question ?

Are you ok ?
67 posted on 06/20/2003 1:09:49 PM PDT by f.Christian (( I'm going to rechristen evolution, in honor of f.Christian, "shlockology"... HumanaeVitae ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Hey, whole sentences. No, I didn't find an answer to your question in that post. Sorry, I'm sure it was very clear to you but it was not to me. You could have just used a simple yes or no. For all I know you could have been a Pitcairn Islander.
68 posted on 06/20/2003 2:47:19 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Unless you're saying you and FletcherC are the same person.
69 posted on 06/20/2003 2:53:43 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Yeah ...

I'm doing an upgrade ---

going to 'byeltsin' ---

the 'st patrick' of mother russia - america !
70 posted on 06/20/2003 3:01:30 PM PDT by f.Christian (( I'm going to rechristen evolution, in honor of f.Christian, "shlockology"... HumanaeVitae ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
Boris Yeltsin drove the snakes out of Russia?!?

Fletch, this IS good news.

;^)
71 posted on 06/20/2003 3:12:46 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: headsonpikes
More like the 'st patton' !
72 posted on 06/20/2003 3:16:17 PM PDT by f.Christian (( I'm going to rechristen evolution, in honor of f.Christian, "shlockology"... HumanaeVitae ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
"More like the 'st patton'!"

LOL! If sitting on a tank is the equal to sweeping through Normandy!

OTOH, the commies retreated to their holes....;^)
73 posted on 06/20/2003 3:25:09 PM PDT by headsonpikes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
That is how I read it....
74 posted on 06/20/2003 3:40:52 PM PDT by NukeMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: f.Christian
By the way, I hope I didn't come off as too harsh.

It's good to see that you can communicate normally. It confirms what is obvious- you choose to post in this manner. I wouldn't want you to change actually. I've gotten quite used to it, to tell the truth. But you have to understand, it's hard to fathom sometimes.

Ty Cobb could hit homers. He just didn't want to.

75 posted on 06/20/2003 4:13:02 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: Prodigal Son
Rand was totally against drugs. She argued that they ought to be outlawed (which they are).

I would be interested in that argument. Do you have a link or a quote?

76 posted on 07/09/2003 10:58:42 AM PDT by Smile-n-Win (Make money, not trouble!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Smile-n-Win
Do you have a link or a quote? No, sorry I don't.
77 posted on 07/09/2003 12:42:37 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-77 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson