1 posted on
06/19/2003 6:37:15 AM PDT by
bedolido
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
To: bedolido
An interview in Der Spiegel by Der Female Beagle. Isn't that special?
To: bedolido
if we fought the war with the previous administration's army, weren't we relying upon the previous administration's intelligence?
3 posted on
06/19/2003 6:39:25 AM PDT by
camle
(no fool like a damned fool)
To: bedolido
The coward won't debate in the US media has to go to a socialist venue to spew.
To: bedolido
Can't decide if she is aiming for being the UN General, or putting on her campaign face, and will announce her bid for Presidency on her book tour when she hits Arkansas. God help us.
To: bedolido
HILLARY WANTS TO END THE US AS WE KNOW IT...
To: bedolido
As Europeans become more familiar with Clinton and her views, their impact will be felt as they bring money and influence to her or a like politician's campaign. That is totally illegal! The Democrats can't accept contributions from non-US donors. We know they do get around this. We need to nail them to the wall every time.
7 posted on
06/19/2003 6:44:25 AM PDT by
Reeses
To: bedolido
New World Order
Hillary's Presidential Campaign Platform????
9 posted on
06/19/2003 6:46:06 AM PDT by
buffyt
(Can you say President Hillary, Mistress of Darkness? Me Neither!!!!!!!!!!!!!)
To: bedolido
This article was posted a couple of days ago. It is extremely important because, on careful reading, we see Hillary endorsing globalism:
Not only is a "globalized and integrated world" inevitable, it is a foreign policy priority of the Democratic Party.
According to Clinton, a single, unified world "is a perspective we Democrats have not successfully made clear."
Strikingly absent from Clinton's interview is any statement by her regarding US national sovereignty. Clearly, maintaining our national sovereignty is not high on Clinton's priority list.
11 posted on
06/19/2003 6:47:14 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: bedolido
Is there a reason why when I tried to link onto this article that I got www.paypal.com instead? Hill and Bill are quietly taking steps to put their own nefarious world plans into place. They are evil and dangerous; we must oppose them at every turn.
12 posted on
06/19/2003 6:49:20 AM PDT by
twigs
To: bedolido
According to Clinton, a single, unified world "is a perspective we Democrats have not successfully made clear."
It's been clear to us FReepers for quite a while.
To: bedolido
"...but "the Republicans prevented" measures... "
I think what she really meant was the Vast Right Wing Conspiracy.
Very telling article. I sure do miss our Constitutional Republic.
16 posted on
06/19/2003 6:51:15 AM PDT by
RRWCC
(Even under a good king, a subject is still a subject.)
To: bedolido
Actually, I think we have a global world.
To: bedolido
Hillary Clinton, already considered an intriguing figure in Europe, will gain additional credibility as a stateswoman as a result of the Der Spiegel interview. She might gain additional credibility with the socialist in Europe
But something tells me that this article will not go over to well at home
20 posted on
06/19/2003 6:56:03 AM PDT by
Mo1
To: bedolido
we were on the right course to a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other. It's the "other way" I greatly fear. Banishing all tribes is very much against our genetic programming. Unlike less genetically developed animals, humans are war makers, it's what human really means. The socialists want to banish tribes for two reasons: 1) socialism goes bankrupt when people can lower their taxes by moving away from it, and 2) they want to redirect military spending to vote buying. That might make sense academically but it is not a sustainable system in the real world, which is a very dangerous place. Hillary is one of the more dangerous people in it.
21 posted on
06/19/2003 6:57:40 AM PDT by
Reeses
To: bedolido
Not only is a "globalized and integrated world" inevitable, it is a foreign policy priority of the Democratic Party. According to Clinton, a single, unified world "is a perspective we Democrats have not successfully made clear."
'Nuff Said!!!
To: bedolido
According to Clinton, a single, unified world "is a perspective we Democrats have not successfully made clear."
This is because people won't vote Democratic if they did make that position clear, and she knows it.
God help us if she ever becomes president.
To: bedolido
SPOTREP
To: All
"a globalized and integrated world - which is coming, one way or the other."Globalization's not the problem, it's that "one way or the other" crap that's the problem.
When a globalize super government, with super constitutional respect for law and liberty, and super requirements for membership, and recognition that super states have super voting power is in the works, then call me a super globalist!
Just dont try to impose this ten steps backward government of the UN on the foundation of freedom here and tell us it's progress, LOL!
26 posted on
06/19/2003 7:15:36 AM PDT by
elfman2
To: bedolido
Not only is a "globalized and integrated world" inevitable, it is a foreign policy priority of the Democratic Party. Reason # 1026 why we should NEVER vote democRAT.
According to Clinton, a single, unified world "is a perspective we Democrats have not successfully made clear."
Of course they haven't made it clear, they're trying to do it by stealth. If their REAL intentions were known, a demoncRAT wouldn't get elected dog-catcher.
In the Der Spiegel interview, Clinton asserted that her husband sought to pass "effective laws" and proposed "more money" to carry out the struggle against terror, but "the Republicans prevented" measures from becoming enacted.
Effective LAWS????!!! Like what!!! Oh yeah, like the time our embassy was blown up ..... No.... OK, what about the time the WTC was bombed in '93.....NO...not then either OK..OK...when the USS Cole was er..... No?, well it'll come to me....X42 must've done SOMETHING during 8 years.
Hillary Clinton, already considered an intriguing figure in Europe, will gain additional credibility as a stateswoman as a result of the Der Spiegel interview.
Well one thing, she let out her true agenda. Thank God for the Internet, even 10 years ago, most Americans wouldn't have had the chance to see an interview like this in a foreign magazine. We'd only see the carefully crafted statements she spouts off the the US news media. She may gain credibility over there but she has NO credibility over here (NY, and Calif not withstanding)
As Europeans become more familiar with Clinton and her views, their impact will be felt as they bring money and influence to her or a like politician's campaign.
And as Americans get more familiar with her true intentions hopefully this woman's political ambitions will be brought to a screaching halt. BTW, why should foreign governments want to donate to her political ambitions? Oh, I get it, they see how wildly successfull the Chi-coms were at buying influence in her husband's administration, so they want in on the ground floor.
The socialist European expectation will be that a Democratic victory will bring into power a U.S. government more to the liking of one-world European politicians.
That statement says it all. Liberals, led by the Clintons MUST be defeated at every turn. Our country's future really depends on it. It's one thing when we say that here on FR, but it's quite another when the woman herself spells it out for you in a foreign magazine. She knows these ideas won't get her anywhere with the US citizenry, but she feels free to let her guard down overseas, knowing full well that her lap-dogs in the US press corps will let it pass.
To: bedolido
Bookmarking
30 posted on
06/19/2003 7:31:44 AM PDT by
Nexus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-56 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson