Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tether Technology: A New Spin on Space Propulsion [space elevator]
space.com ^ | 18 Jun 03 | Leonard David

Posted on 06/18/2003 9:10:00 AM PDT by RightWhale

Tether Technology: A New Spin on Space Propulsion

By Leonard David Senior Space Writer
posted: 07:00 am ET 18 June 2003

In the near future, revolutionary space hardware could put an exciting spin on spaceflight. NASA is putting money into Momentum-eXchange/Electrodynamic Reboost tether technology -- MXER for short -- an innovative concept that if implemented would station miles and miles of cart-wheeling cable in orbit around the Earth. Then, rotating like a giant sling, the cable would swoop down and pick up spacecraft in low orbits, then hurl them to higher orbits or even lob them onward to other planets. MXER is part space technology, part celestial square dancing - the ultimate dos-à-dos swing machine. The hope is to harness momentum while dramatically lowering the cost of launching space missions.


Working on the railroad

Last month, NASA picked over a dozen industry, government and academic groups to tackle novel propulsion ideas that could transform exploration and scientific study of the solar system. Under the auspices of the In-Space Propulsion (ISP) Program, NASA is footing the bill on five research areas: aerocapture; advanced chemical propulsion; solar electric propulsion; solar sail technologies; and space-based tether propulsion. The program is managed in the Office of Space Sciences at NASA Headquarters. "The MXER Tether System will serve as a fully-reusable transportation hub in orbit. It's like a 'space railroad'," said Robert Hoyt, President and Chief Scientist for Tethers Unlimited, Inc./ScienceOps. TUI was awarded funds to look into a MXER tether system based on deployment of a 62-mile (100-kilometer) long cable in orbit around the Earth.

A tether pick-up service for Earth-launched payloads offers cost-cutting pluses. By eliminating the need to launch an upper-stage rocket along with each satellite, Hoyt said that the MXER Tether System means satellites can be boosted into space atop smaller, less expensive rockets. Propulsion costs for space missions would drop by a factor of ten or more, he said.


Failsafe survival

TUI is based in Lynnwood, Washington and is actively working on tether concepts for NASA, the U.S. Department of Defense, and commercial customers. TUI's ScienceOps Division provides scientific computing services, including development, validation, and optimization of scientific software and algorithms. Hoyt said that over the next two years the group's strong focus is on developing a high-strength tether suitable for MXER applications. In addition, special TetherSim computer code will be upgraded to enable in-depth simulation of the rendezvous and capture problems of handling payloads with a MXER tether.

TUI is collaborating with the Air Force Research Laboratory's Materials Laboratory to further earlier progress on a patented "Hoytether". That work centers on creating a failsafe, multi-line tether structure. All the better to survive many years of exposure to the space environment and any nasty run in with debris. "It's sort-of like a one-hundred kilometer long fish-net stocking in space, only it's incredibly strong, and it can withstand many years of bombardment by orbital debris," Hoyt said.


Hard work ahead

Along with Tethers Unlimited, NASA has also awarded MXER tether technology contracts to the Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as well as Lockheed Martin in Denver, Colorado and Tennessee Technological University (TTU) in Cookeville, Tennessee. Work on MXER is rapidly moving ahead. For example, TTU faculty and students are readying a tether momentum exchange experiment - but it won't leave Earth. A scaled model is being devised to exhibit how to capture and release a payload with a rotating tether in a microgravity environment. The tether research will occur inside a KC-135 aircraft under the guidance of NASA through the Reduced Gravity Student Flight Opportunities Program.

How soon MXER could be up and running in space is another matter. "Realistically, I believe it will take about 7-10 years of hard work to get a MXER flight demonstration into orbit," Hoyt told SPACE.com. Under the new In-Space Propulsion contracts, research teams will be busy over the next couple of years using simulations and ground tests to show that the technical challenges of MXER tethers can be solved, he said. "If those efforts are successful, I expect that it would take about 5 years to get a flight program off the ground," Hoyt senses.


High risk, high payoff

MXER tethers are considered by NASA to be "high risk with high payoff," said Les Johnson, Manager, In-Space Propulsion Technology Projects at the NASA Marshall Space Flight Center in Huntsville, Alabama. Efforts at this time are geared to examining the technologies that will make or break MXER for use as an in-space transportation system, Johnson told SPACE.com.

Johnson said that MXER contract awards are focused on rendezvous and capture techniques, stability of the tether, as well as strength and survivability of the cable as it speeds through space. "We are years away from a system-level space demonstration, though not as far as many might naively think. If these key issues can be worked, as we believe they can, MXER tethers might be a viable candidate for use in space by the middle of the next decade," Johnson said.


Sketchy past

Hoyt said that the beauty of the MXER tether is in its reusability. Once the first system is up, fully functional and swinging away, that early hardware can be used to recoup the initial investment on developing the technology. No doubt, given a somewhat sketchy past, a MXER tether needs a solid shakeout in space. NASA has had a couple of high-profile setbacks with tether experiments over the years. But Hoyt counters that at least 17 tether trials have been conducted on-orbit so far. The majority of them have been highly successful, he said.

"Even the ones that didn't go perfectly taught us a great deal. The failures that did happen were more the result of human error and our imperfect understanding of complex technologies rather than any fundamental problem with the technology," Hoyt said. Furthermore, look at how many rockets the early astronauts watched blow up before they rode them into the sky, he added.


Building trust

To help build space community trust in tethers, Hoyt said that several low-cost flight experiments could be flown by late 2004 or early 2005. The first such confidence-builder is the "Multi-Application Survivable Tether", or MAST experiment. This NASA-funded work couples Tethers Unlimited with students and faculty at Stanford University. The project entails deployment of three tiny spacecraft along a lengthy tether. The MAST experiment would show off numerous key technologies, such as tether designs that can survive in space and momentum-exchange propulsion.

"We hope to build upon that experience to fly a very cool mission a couple of years later that will demonstrate electrodynamic tether orbit-raising, and then graduate to a full MXER tether flight demonstration at the end of the decade," Hoyt said. Space tethers have such a huge potential payoff for lowering the cost of space missions, Hoyt believes. "It's inevitable that people will keep trying them until they get it right."


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government; Technical
KEYWORDS: cheaplaunch; hinduropetrick; indianropetrick; magicropetrick; spaceelevator; spaceexploration
This version is do-able.
1 posted on 06/18/2003 9:10:00 AM PDT by RightWhale
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
Sounds like a cool idea. But what I don't understand is where the energy is coming from. If you boost a spacecraft higher, you must use energy, and that will reduce the energy in the tether.

I understand that you could recover the energy by taking higher spacecraft and lowering them, or de-orbiting them. But how often will this be done?

Maybe I'm answering my own question. The energy will be taken from dead spacecraft and boosters, with a side bennefit of cleaning up orbital space?

Might work, but sounds pretty complicated to organize.

2 posted on 06/18/2003 9:18:42 AM PDT by narby (I love the smell of Liberal fear in the morning...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
"Realistically, I believe it will take about 7-10 years of hard work to get a MXER flight demonstration into orbit," Hoyt told SPACE.com.

In NASA-speak, this means it might get off the drawing-board stage in 7-10 decades, at which point the final remaining shuttle will have finally disintegrated into fine space dust after having been kept flying by being patched together with chicken wire and chewing gum to keep it going for just one more flight.

3 posted on 06/18/2003 9:20:12 AM PDT by KellyAdmirer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
This is hardly a new idea. It has been knocking around for at least 30 years.

So9

4 posted on 06/18/2003 9:25:16 AM PDT by Servant of the Nine (A Goldwater Republican)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: narby
If I recall how it works, the tether harnesses the electrical energy produced by spinning the tether through the tenuous (but still significant) atmosphere of orbital space. This produces electricity through a dynamo effect, and this electricity is converted into propulsion.

One of tether experiments on the shuttle failed partly due to a current spike from more-than-anticipated electrical loads. It is an interesting technology, to say the least.
5 posted on 06/18/2003 9:26:59 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: narby
At some point they will run out of mass to balance. This isn't a perpetual motion machine: the clockworks will run down, but there might be ways to wind up the clock without burning chemical fuel.
6 posted on 06/18/2003 9:28:51 AM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
See my previous post - I don't think it's all a case of momentum transfer.
7 posted on 06/18/2003 9:37:00 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
I don't think it's all a case of momentum transfer

No, we'll have to get Michael Faraday or someone else with the common touch to 'splain this.

8 posted on 06/18/2003 9:42:42 AM PDT by RightWhale (gazing at shadows)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
high risk-high payoff bump
9 posted on 06/18/2003 9:45:07 AM PDT by Ahban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
See my previous post - I don't think it's all a case of momentum transfer.

Unfortunately, the energy you pick up by spinning a wire in an electric field results in a drag on the wire. You can use the energy you've picked up to send out photons or something to make a drive - but entropy being what it is, you end up with a net loss.

There are good things and bad things about this idea. The good things are that it's within current material technologies, and it 'works' in the sense that you can indeed use it to boost a payload. I don't think there's any particular challenge in working out the orbital mechanics for the 'catch' and so on. And there are at least two viable methods for replenishing the lost momentum.

Unfortunately, neither of the methods are particularly palatable. One involves sending someone (or something) out to the asteroid belt to boost rocks down to where the string could catch them. That can be a really good idea if the rocks are things you want (nickel-iron, for example), though you've still got to get them through the atmosphere to be useful - at least until near-Earth factories are set up. However, right now it's a pretty impressive challenge to get out to the asteroids and snag a few. The good thing about that is the rocks can be moved in-system relatively slowly, and that's where such things as solar sails or mass drivers can help.

The other method of replenishing the momentum would be to use nuclear propulsion. If it weren't for the political/emotional issues with that, it would be pretty viable. Just think, there could be web postings of the schedule when people should walk outside to see the flash of a nuclear bomb going off a hundred miles overhead.

Oh, there is the problem of wiping out all the satellite systems, but in the (ahem) few years until this became viable, you could replace the current satellites with shielded ones.

I'd love to see this, but I'm not holding my breath.
10 posted on 06/18/2003 10:08:00 AM PDT by Gorjus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
At the Mars Society Convention in Boulder a couple of years ago, one of the developers of this concept had a very interesting presentation about it. I'll see if I can dig up the handouts...
11 posted on 06/18/2003 10:08:46 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
This version is do-able.

But why? Now, in addition to just launching your satellite, you have to make it do a rendezvous with the tether, and you've opened yourself up to all sorts of collision-related risks.

There's an easier way to use tethers: just reel one out, then pump an electric current through it. Presto: electric propulsion.

12 posted on 06/18/2003 10:12:13 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
The way in which you boost the tether to a higher orbit is by using the earth's magnetic field and the tether itself as a sort of electric motor. By running solar electricity through the tether, you wind up with a magnetic force that will serve to push the tehter to a higher orbit.
13 posted on 06/18/2003 10:13:00 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: narby
I understand that you could recover the energy by taking higher spacecraft and lowering them, or de-orbiting them. But how often will this be done?

You could raise the tether's orbit by pumping current through it. The tether would be just like the rotor in an electric motor, interacting with the Earth's magnetic field. Pump current, the tether moves.

14 posted on 06/18/2003 10:14:05 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: r9etb
Here's a good site with a lot of detail:

http://www-ccar.colorado.edu/asen5050/projects/projects_2001/eby/introduction.html
15 posted on 06/18/2003 10:55:11 AM PDT by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: msdrby
ping
16 posted on 06/18/2003 11:51:28 AM PDT by Prof Engineer ( Texans don't even care where Europe is on the map.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RightWhale
bump for more discussion
17 posted on 06/18/2003 7:32:33 PM PDT by Prodigal Son
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Prof Engineer
Thanks. Interesting stuff!
18 posted on 06/19/2003 6:31:34 AM PDT by msdrby (I do believe the cheese slid off his cracker! - The Green Mile)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson