To: Mr. Silverback
Forcing women to take unwanted pregnancies to term doesn't faze you a bit, does it?
47 posted on
06/17/2003 8:07:36 PM PDT by
gcruse
To: gcruse; Mr. Silverback
Forcing women to take unwanted pregnancies to term doesn't faze you a bit, does it? Forcing people to take responsibility for their actions? not a problem for me!
50 posted on
06/17/2003 8:09:35 PM PDT by
Terriergal
("You slaughtered my children and sacrificed them to the idols...." Ez 16:21)
To: gcruse
Forcing people to not drive their cars over guys standing in the street doesn't faze me a bit, either.
Stop and consider this for a moment: You believe this country is only on the right path if a woman can have her child hacked to bits for any reason. In other words, you believe that child murder is part of the American ideal.
Wow, what a hero.
53 posted on
06/17/2003 8:11:08 PM PDT by
Mr. Silverback
(A society that murders little kids is enslaved to something, that's for sure.)
To: gcruse
"Forcing women to take unwanted pregnancies to term doesn't faze you a bit, does it?"
No, not even a bit. That it does "faze" you says only that you are willing to allow the wanton killing of innocent human beings for no better reason than someone else's convenience. I'm hard pressed to think of a notion more morally corrupt than that one.
65 posted on
06/17/2003 8:36:04 PM PDT by
dsc
To: gcruse
Forcing women to take unwanted pregnancies to term doesn't faze you a bit, does it? And of course all these women had sex involuntarily, or hadn't had it explained to them where babies come from. And don't say anything about rape, we all know 1% or less of abortions are from rape.
To: gcruse
Forcing parents to not act to purposely and electively kill their children when the children do not pose a threat to the life of anyone doesn't faze me at all.
After all,the parent-child relationship is unique in the world (at least until human cloned embryos are successfully created.). The parents created the child in a vulnerable state. The parents are responsible for the child's well being until he or she can become independent or until they find someone else to care for them. They are responsible for their actions in creating the child.
With current technology, and the nature of physics, chemistry, and the way these work in biology, the mother bears the burden of the care for the child until he or she can live outside the womb. That is no one's fault it's simply a fact. This power/burden does not give the mother or her agent the right to kill a human being and infringe on his or her right to life.
The meaning of "inalienable" rights is that no one can take the right away, only infringe on that right not to be killed or enslaved, or to have property stolen.
I refer you to the Declaration of Independence for the rest of the story.
124 posted on
06/17/2003 9:30:45 PM PDT by
hocndoc
(Choice is the # 1 killer in the US.)
To: gcruse
Forcing women to take unwanted pregnancies to term doesn't faze you a bit, does it?Killing an innocent pre-born person bothers me a whole lot more.
Abortion is simply the murder of one person to make the life easier for another person. It is never justified (though people try all the time.)
156 posted on
06/18/2003 6:36:07 AM PDT by
Gophack
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson