Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Clinton urged to head NATO
Aftenpost (Norway) ^ | Tuesday 17 June 2003 | Ole Mathismoen

Posted on 06/17/2003 3:02:59 PM PDT by yankeedame

Tuesday 17 June 2003 Updated: 16 Jun, 11:17 (GMT+1)

AFTENPOSTEN
(English frontpage)

Hagen wants Clinton to head NATO

One of Norway's most highly profiled and right-wing politicians, Carl I Hagen, is urging the nomination of former US President Bill Clinton as new NATO boss. Norwegian officials have given up hopes that their own defense minister, Kristin Krohn Devold, will get the job.


Progress Party boss Carl I Hagen thinks Bill Clinton should take over as NATO boss. PHOTO: KNUT FALCH/SCANPIX

Hagen, who heads Norway's Progress Party, told newspaper Aftenposten Monday that NATO's new leader should have international authority, respect and experience. He thinks Clinton, therefore, is the perfect choice.

"There are plenty of people who can be leader of a secretariat in Brussels, but that's not what NATO needs right now," Hagen told Aftenposten, adding that he thinks NATO needs a "political heavyweight" to succeed Lord Robertson as general secretary.

"NATO is in a very difficult situation, with a deep conflict between the US and the major EU countries Germany and France," Hagen said. The new general secretary, he said, must be able to bring NATO members together again.

Clinton, he notes, "has good and close contact with many of Europe's leaders, and he enjoys considerable respect. He can be the bridge-builder the alliance needs."

Hagen added that it's especially important for Norway that the conflict within NATO be eased. "Therefore Prime Minister Kjell Magne Bondevik should propose Bill Clinton as a candidate," he said.

Devold's waning prospects He denied his proposal was meant to undermine Bondevik's own efforts to push Norwegian Defense Minister Kristin Krohn Devold's candidacy. "If NATO decides the alliance should have a general secretary who will first and foremost be a secretariat leader, I haven't said she's unqualified," he said.

Hagen also said he thinks it would be difficult for US President George W Bush to oppose Clinton if a majority of European countries want him.

Devold's informal candidacy, meanwhile, doesn't appear to have generated much support from other European leaders. One source told Aftenposten that while Devold is viewed as a having done a good job for Norway, "no one has said, 'yeah, this is the candidate we need.'"

Other strikes against her are her relatively limited international experience and the fact that Norway, while a member of NATO, is not a member of the EU.

===============================================

Aftenposten's Norwegian reporter: Ole Mathismoen
Aftenposten English Web Desk: Nina Berglund


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: nato; norway; sextypething; x42
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Dog Gone
"Yeah, I see what he's saying. Bush has never stood up to Europe on anything, including Kyoto, the ICC, Iraq, or anything else."
(chortle)
21 posted on 06/17/2003 3:57:16 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Texas_Jarhead
Oh My God!!!

Hellish scenario......

Bill Clinton as head of NATO
Hillary Clinton as President of the United States.

The End of The World would surely follow.

22 posted on 06/17/2003 4:21:29 PM PDT by Dr._Joseph_Warren
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Word has it that Clinton is in a dead heat with Jerry Lewis, ExLax Baldwin, and Woody Allen for the job.....
23 posted on 06/17/2003 4:24:12 PM PDT by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dr._Joseph_Warren
The good Lord would never let things get that far.....
24 posted on 06/17/2003 4:24:56 PM PDT by tracer (/b>)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
I would be comfortable with BC as head of Club Med. Anything beyond that would be disasterous.
25 posted on 06/17/2003 4:48:00 PM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: yankeedame
This is dumb in general and dumb even for Clinton.

NATO is really a general's club. The civilian component is insignificant.

Clinton is no general.....so it's dumb "in general."

But Clinton is not going to place himself between some politicized generals, either.

No way that Clinton will get anywhere near this.
27 posted on 06/17/2003 5:04:48 PM PDT by HatSteel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Digger
So, as usual with you Bush-bashers, it's GWBs fault! Can you explain just how it's his fault? With everything on his plate right now, is it his job to be B.Clinton's keeper? Good grief!!
28 posted on 06/17/2003 6:54:00 PM PDT by dsutah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2
Clinton killed NATO in Kosovo - let him be in charge of the burial.
29 posted on 06/17/2003 8:36:29 PM PDT by Destro (Know your enemy! Help fight Islamic terrorisim by visiting www.johnathangaltfilms.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
OMG. I know I am repeating myself a lot tonight, but I am almost through the new book Dereliction of Duty. Anyone reading that would know what a dangerous idea this is! I hope all freepers get a copy of this book, along with First Strike.
30 posted on 06/17/2003 8:38:40 PM PDT by ladyinred
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
That would resemble a regular job for Clinton. Do you honestly think boy Clinton could handle a regular job?

BWAHAHAHAHA!

31 posted on 06/17/2003 9:21:45 PM PDT by nightdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Such statements appeal to Clinton's ego. The guy can't stand not being in power. This is a snowball in hell, but it seems to prove that the Clintons are madly bent on a return to power.
32 posted on 07/15/2003 1:21:04 PM PDT by RobbyS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Oh Please...Bill Clinton? LOL!!!
33 posted on 07/15/2003 1:34:21 PM PDT by hattend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson