Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Presidency is Advancing the Progressive Agenda
Sierra Times ^ | 6-17-03 | John Bender

Posted on 06/17/2003 5:07:22 AM PDT by SUSSA

Democrats may be worried that George Bush is unbeatable in 2004, but President Bush’s strength is good news for progressives. No president since LBJ has been as successful in expanding government and increasing the size and scope of social programs as this president. Presidents Carter and Clinton didn’t even come close to matching President Bush’s accomplishments in expanding government social programs. George Bush increased government size and spending more in his first two years than Bill Clinton did in his first six years. By the end of this year, he will have expanded government more than Bill Clinton did in his entire eight-year administration.

To be fair, Bill Clinton had to fight the conservatives in Congress who threw up every roadblock they could muster to thwart his progressive agenda. George Bush has not only silenced the conservative wing of the Republican Party, he has ground them into pulp and made them toothless tigers.

There is no longer any serious talk about making government smaller or eliminating government departments or programs. Smaller government used to be the bedrock principal of the Republican Party. President Bush changed that and is pushing Republicans in Congress not just to accept bigger government, but to embrace it.

Instead of eliminating the Education Department, George Bush almost doubled its size and pushed through the largest increase in funding the department ever enjoyed. He and Ted Kennedy worked closely together to make sure that the federal government also has more power over local schools than ever before.

The testing mandated by the education bill, and the mandate that schools meet minimum standards is a brilliant maneuver that will demand the standards and the tests be controlled centrally from Washington. No one will be able to oppose national standards and a national testing system. Without national standards, testing is subjective and worthless. National standards and a standardized national test will require local schools teach to the test. That means Washington will be dictating the curriculum in every school in America. Bill Clinton and Al Gore couldn’t even dream of accomplishing this much progress.

In other areas President Bush also out performed President Clinton. He expanded other programs the Contract With America targeted for elimination. He expanded Americorps, the Peace Corps, the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and Head Start.

Working closely with progressive Republicans and Democrats, George Bush passed the farm bill that dismantled the Freedom to Farm Act that conservative Republicans pushed through Congress, and President Clinton signed, in 1996. This new legislation boosts farm spending to record levels. President Bush’s farm bill not only increased old subsidies, it created new subsidies our farmers never had before. No Democrat president could have pushed this legislation through a Republican controlled Congress. The conservative wing of the party still holds some powerful positions in Congress, especially in the House. They were proud of the Freedom to Farm Act and would have fought tooth and nail with a Democrat president to keep it in place. They caved in to President Bush without even a hint of a fight. President Bush effectively cut the conservatives in Congress off at the knees on this legislation and on most of their domestic agenda. He rules the Republican Party with an iron fist and conservatives are unable to out maneuver him.

President Bush signed the Campaign Finance Reform bill into law. Conservative Republicans in Congress are still quietly seething about how he steamrollered them on this. President Bush is also leading the fight to expand Medicare, add prescription drug coverage and mandate mental health coverage. Conservatives kept Presidents Carter and Clinton from adding these entitlements to Medicare. With President Bush pushing the agenda, they aren’t even pretending to oppose these additions.

The president is also leading the fight to extend the child tax credit to low income families excluded from the latest tax cut. He figuratively bitch-slapped Tom Delay and his conservative cohorts who threatened to derail the expanded credit, urging the Republicans to pass the bill quickly and send it to him for his signature. While progressive Republicans like to claim President Bush is following President Reagan’s vision for America, he is actually following President Nixon’s agenda to the letter. President Nixon never tried to eliminate any government program or agency. He expanded government as much as he could. Few people remember that it was President Nixon who created the Environmental Protection Agency, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the National Endowment for the Arts. Fewer still remember that it was President Nixon who tied Social Security benefits to the cost of living. President Bush is surpassing President Nixon in advancing progressive social policy.

President Bush is also making talk radio safe for progressives. Hosts who would have railed against President Clinton, or any Democrat, for pushing the progressive agenda President Bush is implementing, excuse this president for it. Many of them attack any conservative who calls to point out that President Bush is a progressive. Even Rush Limbaugh is leery of taking on this president. While he occasionally offers some mild criticism of the president, he always follows that criticism by offering excuses for the president’s actions and progressive domestic agenda. This is partially due to the attacks that come from the Bush cultists any time anyone is anything but worshipful of their guy. Like Democrats who refused to believe that President Clinton was capable of doing any wrong, there is a group of Republicans who would support President Bush no matter how far left he governs. They attack anyone and any group who points out that President Bush is not conservative. Many of these people are domestic progressives who like big government and benefit from government programs. They call themselves conservatives; many of them really think they are conservatives. In fact, they support progressive social programs and most benefit from them. They are critical of the poor who receive government help, but enjoy generous government subsidies of their own lifestyles. Many talk show hosts fall into this category themselves.

The other reason even real conservatives are leery of voicing anything except the mildest criticism of President Bush is they fear retaliation from the administration. They fear being cut off from the information loop. They fear being dropped from the administration’s fax and E-mail grapevine. Their professional status is greatly enhanced by access to administration sources and President Bush is not shy about diminishing or eliminating that access for anyone who puts their principals ahead of support for his agenda.

All things considered, progressives are much better off with President Bush in office than they would be with any of his Democrat challengers. No Democrat on the scene today can come close to matching President Bush’s ability to advance the progressive agenda and marginalize the conservatives in the Republican Party. Four more years of a Bush administration will produce progressive gains that are only matched by FDR’s accomplishments. Rather than being disappointed that they don’t have a Democrat in the presidency, progressives should be thankful they have an ideological soul mate in office. For progressives the cry should be “FOUR MORE YEARS!”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- John Bender is a freelance writer from Dallas, Texas. His columns have appeared in The Dallas Morning News, Ether Zone, Right Magazine, The Sierra Times, USA Daily and other print and online publications. Your feedback is welcome.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushdoctrine; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640641-655 last
To: sauropod
Its just a question of what will bring America to a flash point.

And you are looking forward to this?

641 posted on 06/19/2003 6:57:30 AM PDT by Amelia (It's better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 640 | View Replies]

To: Amelia; Noumenon
Yes. America is no longer free.
642 posted on 06/19/2003 6:58:05 AM PDT by sauropod (Watch out for low flying brooms! The Witch has left the Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 641 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA
"That’s what the Clintonistas said when people pointed out the truth about their idol."

They're still saying it (as we found out last night at the latest Hillary! book signing).

643 posted on 06/19/2003 7:01:17 AM PDT by sauropod (Watch out for low flying brooms! The Witch has left the Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 576 | View Replies]

To: Deb
What crap!

Get your head out from where the sun don't shine!

644 posted on 06/19/2003 7:03:11 AM PDT by sauropod (Watch out for low flying brooms! The Witch has left the Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: Mulder; MadIvan; Byron_the_Aussie
Spot on!
645 posted on 06/19/2003 7:04:23 AM PDT by sauropod (Watch out for low flying brooms! The Witch has left the Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 587 | View Replies]

To: Ms. AntiFeminazi
We will agree to disagree agreeably.

I know someone that sat at a table with either Karl Rove or Andy Card (can't remember which) and asked him "What about the conservatives?"

The response was "We don't care about the conservatives. They have no place else to go."

True story.

646 posted on 06/19/2003 7:06:35 AM PDT by sauropod (Watch out for low flying brooms! The Witch has left the Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 590 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Its just deb, she has been the Bush defender of whatever he does since the start. I think she knows just what Bush is and still promotes it.

ie socialism,,,,,

my humble thought.
647 posted on 06/19/2003 7:09:35 AM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 644 | View Replies]

To: Deb; Fred Mertz; Noumenon; SUSSA
Tell you what, sweetie cups. You can pay my increased state taxes for me. You can go through the ridiculous security checks at the airport. You can go ahead and do my job search when i lose my job due to H1-B visas. You can go ahead and pay my increased health care costs because of out of control tort lawyers and lots and lots of illegal immigration because W. won;t do a damn thing about the borders.
648 posted on 06/19/2003 7:10:01 AM PDT by sauropod (Watch out for low flying brooms! The Witch has left the Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
The response was "We don't care about the conservatives. They have no place else to go."

True story.


Sounds about right from the way he treats the conservatives.
649 posted on 06/19/2003 7:10:45 AM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
uh huh. sure.
650 posted on 06/19/2003 11:10:31 AM PDT by Ms. AntiFeminazi (three rights make a LEFT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 646 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Yes. America is no longer free.

So you want a civil war?

You are out of your ever-lovin' mind.

651 posted on 06/19/2003 12:04:38 PM PDT by Amelia (It's better to light a single candle than to curse the darkness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 642 | View Replies]

To: Dane
The truth is that in the future, when medicare and it's sidekick costs, nearly quadruple what they are projected, and there is no political way to cut them, we can all thank a "conservative" GW and his foresight.
652 posted on 06/19/2003 12:09:55 PM PDT by jeremiah (Sunshine scares all of them, for they all are cockaroaches)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
After the 94 take over of the House, we were set to take the presidency, but the RINO wing of the party worked their butts off to nominate one of their own. With the help of the elite press, they managed to get Dole nominated assuring that no matter who won the presidency we would have a lying, liberal, scum bag in the presidency.

Many pro-life Christians, Second Amendment supporters, and other conservatives who make up the base, either sat out the election or voted third party. There was no real difference between Dole and Clinton. The main distinction between the two is that Dole never raped anyone that we know of.

That is why we failed to take back the presidency in 96. It wasn’t because conservatives can’t win. We didn’t have one running.

The 92 and 96 elections should be a lesson for the Bush camp. There are enough conservatives who will only take so much, to derail a Republican’s campaign. There aren’t enough swing votes to offset the loss if the candidate is too far left for the rock-ribbed conservatives in the base.

George the Elder and the RINOs who ran the RNC in 96, made the mistake of thinking they could scare enough conservatives into voting Republican. They thought wrong. They underestimated the commitment many conservatives have to some issues.

Look, Bush is doing well on foreign affairs. He is doing pretty well on taxes. If he will shift gears on spending and entitlements, and veto the ugly weapon ban extension, he will hold the conservatives that his father and Dole both lost.

This isn’t too much to expect. And IMHO it is the lesson of 92 and 96.
653 posted on 06/19/2003 2:50:06 PM PDT by SUSSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: Amelia
In 1980, Reagan won the presidency, the GOP won the Senate, but the Dems kept the House. This was repeated in 1984, but the GOP lost the Senate in 1986.

In the 80's there were many democrats in the House, mostly from the south, who were more conservative than the northeastern Republicans. You have to keep in mind, that most of the south was a one-party region until 1994. So while the House may have been "democratic", it was somewhat conservative to the point of voting for Reagan's massive tax cuts.

Also, since democrats controlled most state houses, until recently, the districts were biased towards the dems.

In 1986, fallout over Iran Contra cost the GOP the Senate.

In 1994, the GOP took back both houses of Congress, but Dems kept the presidency (it being an off-year election) and also kept the presidency in 1996.

They won in 1996 because the GOP nominated Bob Dolt and the Congress backed down to Klinton. If you looked at policies, there wasn't much difference between the two candidates in 96.

Frankly, it looks to me like this is generally a divided country, but maybe that's just my opinion.

That's what the RINOs want you to think. As long as enough people believe this crap about a 50/50 split, the trend towards more government will never be reversed. You know, "we can't rock the boat with all this division". Politicians have really done a good job turning men vs. women, whites vs. blacks, etc.... when the real enemy is THEM.

Maybe I'll believe the country is really 'divided 50/50' when the liberals can duplicate the 4 landslides the conservatives have had during the last 20 years.

Of course, if Bush continues to follow in the legacy of his daddy and Klinton by leaving our borders open, the country really will be divided. But not for long, as we're quickly outnumbered by third world parasites.

654 posted on 06/19/2003 4:25:33 PM PDT by Mulder (Live Free or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 639 | View Replies]

To: Amelia; sauropod
Actually ,

If we need to come full circle to get back to being a Republic then so be it . Is it not how we began ?

655 posted on 06/19/2003 9:46:31 PM PDT by Ben Bolt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 651 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640641-655 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson