Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush Presidency is Advancing the Progressive Agenda
Sierra Times ^ | 6-17-03 | John Bender

Posted on 06/17/2003 5:07:22 AM PDT by SUSSA

Democrats may be worried that George Bush is unbeatable in 2004, but President Bush’s strength is good news for progressives. No president since LBJ has been as successful in expanding government and increasing the size and scope of social programs as this president. Presidents Carter and Clinton didn’t even come close to matching President Bush’s accomplishments in expanding government social programs. George Bush increased government size and spending more in his first two years than Bill Clinton did in his first six years. By the end of this year, he will have expanded government more than Bill Clinton did in his entire eight-year administration.

To be fair, Bill Clinton had to fight the conservatives in Congress who threw up every roadblock they could muster to thwart his progressive agenda. George Bush has not only silenced the conservative wing of the Republican Party, he has ground them into pulp and made them toothless tigers.

There is no longer any serious talk about making government smaller or eliminating government departments or programs. Smaller government used to be the bedrock principal of the Republican Party. President Bush changed that and is pushing Republicans in Congress not just to accept bigger government, but to embrace it.

Instead of eliminating the Education Department, George Bush almost doubled its size and pushed through the largest increase in funding the department ever enjoyed. He and Ted Kennedy worked closely together to make sure that the federal government also has more power over local schools than ever before.

The testing mandated by the education bill, and the mandate that schools meet minimum standards is a brilliant maneuver that will demand the standards and the tests be controlled centrally from Washington. No one will be able to oppose national standards and a national testing system. Without national standards, testing is subjective and worthless. National standards and a standardized national test will require local schools teach to the test. That means Washington will be dictating the curriculum in every school in America. Bill Clinton and Al Gore couldn’t even dream of accomplishing this much progress.

In other areas President Bush also out performed President Clinton. He expanded other programs the Contract With America targeted for elimination. He expanded Americorps, the Peace Corps, the National Endowment for the Arts, the National Endowment for the Humanities, and Head Start.

Working closely with progressive Republicans and Democrats, George Bush passed the farm bill that dismantled the Freedom to Farm Act that conservative Republicans pushed through Congress, and President Clinton signed, in 1996. This new legislation boosts farm spending to record levels. President Bush’s farm bill not only increased old subsidies, it created new subsidies our farmers never had before. No Democrat president could have pushed this legislation through a Republican controlled Congress. The conservative wing of the party still holds some powerful positions in Congress, especially in the House. They were proud of the Freedom to Farm Act and would have fought tooth and nail with a Democrat president to keep it in place. They caved in to President Bush without even a hint of a fight. President Bush effectively cut the conservatives in Congress off at the knees on this legislation and on most of their domestic agenda. He rules the Republican Party with an iron fist and conservatives are unable to out maneuver him.

President Bush signed the Campaign Finance Reform bill into law. Conservative Republicans in Congress are still quietly seething about how he steamrollered them on this. President Bush is also leading the fight to expand Medicare, add prescription drug coverage and mandate mental health coverage. Conservatives kept Presidents Carter and Clinton from adding these entitlements to Medicare. With President Bush pushing the agenda, they aren’t even pretending to oppose these additions.

The president is also leading the fight to extend the child tax credit to low income families excluded from the latest tax cut. He figuratively bitch-slapped Tom Delay and his conservative cohorts who threatened to derail the expanded credit, urging the Republicans to pass the bill quickly and send it to him for his signature. While progressive Republicans like to claim President Bush is following President Reagan’s vision for America, he is actually following President Nixon’s agenda to the letter. President Nixon never tried to eliminate any government program or agency. He expanded government as much as he could. Few people remember that it was President Nixon who created the Environmental Protection Agency, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration and the National Endowment for the Arts. Fewer still remember that it was President Nixon who tied Social Security benefits to the cost of living. President Bush is surpassing President Nixon in advancing progressive social policy.

President Bush is also making talk radio safe for progressives. Hosts who would have railed against President Clinton, or any Democrat, for pushing the progressive agenda President Bush is implementing, excuse this president for it. Many of them attack any conservative who calls to point out that President Bush is a progressive. Even Rush Limbaugh is leery of taking on this president. While he occasionally offers some mild criticism of the president, he always follows that criticism by offering excuses for the president’s actions and progressive domestic agenda. This is partially due to the attacks that come from the Bush cultists any time anyone is anything but worshipful of their guy. Like Democrats who refused to believe that President Clinton was capable of doing any wrong, there is a group of Republicans who would support President Bush no matter how far left he governs. They attack anyone and any group who points out that President Bush is not conservative. Many of these people are domestic progressives who like big government and benefit from government programs. They call themselves conservatives; many of them really think they are conservatives. In fact, they support progressive social programs and most benefit from them. They are critical of the poor who receive government help, but enjoy generous government subsidies of their own lifestyles. Many talk show hosts fall into this category themselves.

The other reason even real conservatives are leery of voicing anything except the mildest criticism of President Bush is they fear retaliation from the administration. They fear being cut off from the information loop. They fear being dropped from the administration’s fax and E-mail grapevine. Their professional status is greatly enhanced by access to administration sources and President Bush is not shy about diminishing or eliminating that access for anyone who puts their principals ahead of support for his agenda.

All things considered, progressives are much better off with President Bush in office than they would be with any of his Democrat challengers. No Democrat on the scene today can come close to matching President Bush’s ability to advance the progressive agenda and marginalize the conservatives in the Republican Party. Four more years of a Bush administration will produce progressive gains that are only matched by FDR’s accomplishments. Rather than being disappointed that they don’t have a Democrat in the presidency, progressives should be thankful they have an ideological soul mate in office. For progressives the cry should be “FOUR MORE YEARS!”

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- John Bender is a freelance writer from Dallas, Texas. His columns have appeared in The Dallas Morning News, Ether Zone, Right Magazine, The Sierra Times, USA Daily and other print and online publications. Your feedback is welcome.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: bush; bushdoctrine; politics
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 641-655 next last
To: SUSSA
And how do you suggest we get Bush to govern like a conservative?

By growing the Conservative base so that it's larger than the moderate and liberal bases combined. If it's already larger, than contact the White House and the Congress in writing, preferably, and let then know how you feel.

The only pressure we have is our vote.

Try some of the stuff I mentioned. If you are into activism, hold rallies, marches, etc. Be creative. Fight for what you believe in...don't run away mad.

He has to earn it like any other politician.

Oh geez, not the "he has to earn" or "vote my principles" or the "vote my conscience" or the "vote my morals" thing again. That stuff don't mix with raw politics.

If he doesn't start governing like a conservative, I will not vote for him again. You may do as you please with your vote. I'll do as I please with mine.

There you go again. Threatening to enable the Liberals again. I asked you not to do that. You guys and the Democrats can be real pains.

581 posted on 06/18/2003 8:51:24 PM PDT by Consort
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 580 | View Replies]

To: TLBSHOW
Bush is more of a conservative than you are and he doesn't suffer the advanced mental illness you, uncle bill and the rest of your DU buddies do.
582 posted on 06/18/2003 9:00:33 PM PDT by Deb (You couldn't see the truth if it sat on your face.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 574 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Bush is no conservative, and I hope you realize that by now. He's a good man, but his handlers are socialists.

Why do I waste my time?

583 posted on 06/18/2003 9:04:06 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: Amelia; MAF; Carry_Okie
Not much, I admit.

Let me put this to you. I view FR as a whetstone to sharpen my mind and my conservative arguments.

Because I am an FR denizen, I am much more informed than most folks on either side.

Because I possess this knowledge, the possession of same requires a higher standard. If i know that my vote will help to further the Socialist Nanny State we are sliding into, how can I (in good conscience) vote for the person that does that, just at a slower pace than the other guy?

584 posted on 06/18/2003 9:06:27 PM PDT by sauropod (Watch out for low flying brooms! The Witch has left the Wal-Mart)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 561 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
she needs her eyes opened because Bush is no conservative, not even close.
585 posted on 06/18/2003 9:08:22 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies]

To: Deb
I guess we will have to disagree about Socialist Bush!
586 posted on 06/18/2003 9:10:11 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth unlike deb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
I've been "enjoying" it since 1994. Remember the Gingrich Revolution?

20 years ago, the Republican leader was out saying "government is not the solution to our problem, government is the problem".

10 years ago, the Republican leader was calling for a "second American revolution" and the abolition of no less than 4 cabinet departments.

Now, we're being told to accept a massive increase in the size of the government not seen since the days of LBJ. We're being told to accept the renewal of the idiotic assault weapons ban, while the same politicans turn a blind eye to violations of our borders laws in masse. Furthermore, we're being told we need to give up our Rights in order to be "safe" from terrorists, who while dangerous, pose nowhere near the threat the USSR did.

So when are our Republican leaders going to actually start acting like Republicans? "Shut up and wait" simply isn't going to cut it, especially when large number of so-called "Republicans" are calling for the gun-grabbing statist, Guiliani, to be the nominee in 2008.

587 posted on 06/18/2003 9:10:29 PM PDT by Mulder (Live Free or die)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 560 | View Replies]

To: Deb
They aren't DUers, Deb, they're benighted fringers , who see themselves as the ONLY ones who are Conservatives. GOD, only knows how or why they do, but they do.
588 posted on 06/18/2003 9:10:29 PM PDT by nopardons
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 582 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
At least we know what you are and where you stand.

How are the cow plops?

589 posted on 06/18/2003 9:14:18 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 588 | View Replies]

To: sauropod
Because you can have hope in your own good works and the works of other likeminded people that things can turn around before we slide forevermore into that socialist nanny state.

Throwing in the towel does no good because once that socialist nanny state takes over completely, you will never regain your freedom. Just look how difficult it is to gain the freedoms already lost back?

Go to Hell shock value doesn't work either. It was already tried with Clinton. All that got us was a Go Straight to Hell card without passing Go! Luckily, we got to roll again.

Just as you say you will never soften on your principles, I will NEVER vote in the hopes that this country will suffer just to "show them".

590 posted on 06/18/2003 9:19:28 PM PDT by Ms. AntiFeminazi (three rights make a LEFT)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 584 | View Replies]

To: nopardons
I know who they are, I'm just trying to make them scream. Not much on TV tonight.
591 posted on 06/18/2003 9:21:50 PM PDT by Deb (You couldn't see the truth if it sat on your face.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 588 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Not much on TV tonight

...

tonight? LOL or any other night for that matter.
592 posted on 06/18/2003 9:23:42 PM PDT by TLBSHOW (the gift is to see the truth unlike deb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 591 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Fred, when you move to that international center of Constitutional freedm and Democracy, Mexico...will you send me back one of them big hats with all the sequins and stuff?
593 posted on 06/18/2003 9:27:15 PM PDT by Deb (Vincente Fox, now there's a Conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 589 | View Replies]

To: Deb
I'm considering Costa Rica also. I'll send you whatever you wish.
594 posted on 06/18/2003 9:30:09 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: SUSSA

With Hitlery at the helm the full-attack has begun. The democRATS are the Leftist Progressives, in which we need to be aware of, yet 500 something posts on this, stupid arguing.

Look What the Official DNC Web Site is Spinning now!

Also Click Here

And, this is their main graphic.


595 posted on 06/18/2003 9:31:58 PM PDT by TaRaRaBoomDeAyGoreLostToday!
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Within reason, of course.
596 posted on 06/18/2003 9:32:01 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Well Bush sure isn't the Conservative ole Vincente Fox is, that's fer sure. But the "socialist" idocy is likewise "getting old and sour". And hanging with the political Flat Earth Society around here is affecting your IQ.

Why do you waste your time? You should be packing.

597 posted on 06/18/2003 9:34:36 PM PDT by Deb (Vincente Fox, now there's a Conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 583 | View Replies]

To: Fred Mertz
Okay, Costa Rica...now you're talkin'. Isn't Sting the president of CR now?
598 posted on 06/18/2003 9:37:53 PM PDT by Deb (Vincente Fox, now there's a Conservative!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 594 | View Replies]

To: Deb
You're right! I should be packing, but I have a dog.
599 posted on 06/18/2003 9:38:18 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 597 | View Replies]

To: Deb
My old college classmate was President of CR in the mid-nineties. Jose Figueres (something).
600 posted on 06/18/2003 9:40:09 PM PDT by Fred Mertz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 561-580581-600601-620 ... 641-655 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson