1 posted on
06/16/2003 10:53:37 AM PDT by
AZ Righty
To: AZ Righty
You don't need permission to post his comments.
To: AZ Righty
While we're destroying the first amendment, let's knock the press down a notch or two too.
3 posted on
06/16/2003 10:58:04 AM PDT by
RAT Patrol
(Congress can give one American a dollar only by first taking it away from another American. -W.W.)
To: AZ Righty
Not much of a description of the ruling to even form an opinion.
4 posted on
06/16/2003 10:59:49 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: AZ Righty
5 posted on
06/16/2003 11:03:08 AM PDT by
Blood of Tyrants
(Even if the government took all your earnings, you wouldn’t be, in its eyes, a slave.)
To: AZ Righty
I'm still shaking my head that these law makers think they have to pass a law to make them honest
7 posted on
06/16/2003 11:06:06 AM PDT by
Mo1
To: AZ Righty
Washington, D.C. - U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) released the following statement today in response to the Supreme Courts decision to uphold the ban on direct, political contributions:
The Supreme Courts decision today to uphold the ban on direct, political contributions from corporations is both welcome and consistent with legal precedent and congressional reform efforts. Corporations have been barred from making campaign contributions from their general treasury funds for almost a century, and I am heartened by the Courts refusal today to erode that prohibition and open up the potential for corruption and circumvention. Americans deserve a political finance system that is free from the taint of corruption and the undue influence of special interests.
8 posted on
06/16/2003 11:09:00 AM PDT by
AntiGuv
(™)
To: AZ Righty
I wish McCain took the issue of the army buying chinese made berets as seriously as he takes this crap.
16 posted on
06/16/2003 11:28:35 AM PDT by
adam_az
To: AZ Righty
SCOTUS did not uphold the McCain-Feingold bill. They upheld a somewhat related case regarding a 32 year old federal law prohibiting adcovacy groups from giving campaign contributions to a candidate.
The title of this article is somewhat misleading, something we've come to expect from the mainstream media.
I feel that some parts of McCain-Feingold will not survive - for example, the 60 days prior to an election (or however many days it is) ban of all campaign advertisements.
I'm kind of surprised liberal activists aren't raising as much of a stink. McCain-Feingold aka The Media's Political Views Empowerment Act also bestows the same influence on banes of liberal existence like Limbaugh-Hannity-Savage-O'Reilly.
To: AZ Righty
I give up, where's the article?
To: AZ Righty
Considering that CFR is hurting the dems more than the pubbies, things could be worse.
20 posted on
06/16/2003 11:31:58 AM PDT by
js1138
To: AZ Righty
Posted by PHXnews on Monday June 16, 2003 at 10:42 am MST
Washington, D.C. - U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ) released the following statement today in response to the Supreme Courts decision to uphold the ban on direct, political contributions:
The Supreme Courts decision today to uphold the ban on direct, political contributions from corporations is both welcome and consistent with legal precedent and congressional reform efforts. Corporations have been barred from making campaign contributions from their general treasury funds for almost a century, and I am heartened by the Courts refusal today to erode that prohibition and open up the potential for corruption and circumvention. Americans deserve a political finance system that is free from the taint of corruption and the undue influence of special interests.
26 posted on
06/16/2003 11:45:48 AM PDT by
deport
(Scratch a dog and you will have a permanent job.....)
To: AZ Righty
Don't anybody panic - this is a separate issue than the McCain issue. This is not related to the McConnell lawsuit.
30 posted on
06/16/2003 12:44:09 PM PDT by
CyberAnt
( America - You Are The Greatest!!)
To: AZ Righty
SCOTUS upheld a 30 year old law...one that's been on the books and "worked around" for years. McLame is whacked.
31 posted on
06/16/2003 1:34:02 PM PDT by
Recovering_Democrat
(I'm so glad to no longer be associated with the Party of Dependence on Government!)
To: AZ Righty
Remember the defense of George Bush when he signed this abomination into law? "Never fear, the Supremes will rule it unconstitutional. It's a bold political move to disarm McCain's only issue. Bush is a political genius; he knows what he's doing."
I'll be expecting full, red-faced retractions from the Bush idolators any time now.
36 posted on
06/16/2003 2:55:23 PM PDT by
IronJack
To: AZ Righty
McCain is a dingus.
38 posted on
06/16/2003 4:16:25 PM PDT by
Conservative til I die
(They say anti-Catholicism is the thinking man's anti-Semitism; that's an insult to thinking men)
To: AZ Righty
You know what I think about this. I think (Censored by the USSC) and that candidates for office like (Censored by the USSC) should not be allowed to (Censored by the USSC). Nor should the other parties (Censored by the USSC) take advantage of those of us on boards like FR to speak our minds by (Censored by the USSC). In fact I think FR is (Censored by the USSC) way that we have any hope left to (Censored by the USSC). It's a (Censored by the USSC) that (Censored by the USSC) can do what these (Censored by the USSC) retentive groups like (Censored by the USSC) to honest Constitutinalists like (Censored by the USSC) (Censored by the USSC) (Censored by the USSC) (Censored by the USSC). Sigh. I guess from now on, we'll only be allowed to talk about the weather.
44 posted on
06/16/2003 6:42:20 PM PDT by
Beck_isright
(When Senator Byrd landed on an aircraft carrier, the blacks were forced below shoveling coal...)
To: AZ Righty
So, those who thought the Supreme Court would rescue the cowardly Congress on "campaign finance reform" have been refuted AGAIN???
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson