Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why We Cannot Shake the Clintons
IntellectualConservative.com ^ | June 13, 2003 | Brian S. Wise

Posted on 06/14/2003 7:06:32 PM PDT by az4vlad

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 06/14/2003 7:06:32 PM PDT by az4vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
"The contention here has long been that Bill Clinton suffers from some low grade mental illness "

Low grade? He is a pathological narcissist at the very least, if not a sociopath.

2 posted on 06/14/2003 7:12:54 PM PDT by sweetliberty ("Having the right to do a thing is not at all the same thing as being right in doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
The Clinton's are a symptom, not the disease.
3 posted on 06/14/2003 7:15:29 PM PDT by AEMILIUS PAULUS (Further, the statement assumed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
It is the media that has the obsession with the Clintons. Just like they currently have an obsession with the Laci/Scott Peterson case.

It is the media's obsession. If the media weren't so blinded and enamoured by the Clintons, the Clintons would sink into obscurity--but then, the media won't allow that to happen.

The media is as fixiated on the Clintons as the Clintons are on media attention. As with the co-dependency in the Clinton marriage, the media are co-dependents of the Clintons.
4 posted on 06/14/2003 7:20:52 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Was flipping through channels and there was Bill Clinton a short time ago on Larry King -- took my all of 10 seconds or less to keep on going. CNN LOVES the Clintons and pushes them at every opportunity not to mention other media members like Rather!
5 posted on 06/14/2003 7:22:23 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
"The New York Times has published a negative review of Hillary's book."

My friends, the book must be plain awful.
6 posted on 06/14/2003 7:22:55 PM PDT by rs79bm (The difference between Los Angeles and yogurt is that yogurt comes with less fruit ... R. Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
I bet ya to it! Took me only 5 seconds!
7 posted on 06/14/2003 7:23:27 PM PDT by rs79bm (The difference between Los Angeles and yogurt is that yogurt comes with less fruit ... R. Limbaugh)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
I always shake my "Clinton" right after going to the bathroom, sometimes I even have to wipe my "Hillary".
8 posted on 06/14/2003 7:24:03 PM PDT by this_ol_patriot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AEMILIUS PAULUS
The Clinton's are a symptom, not the disease.

Bingo.

Corrupted electorate bump.

9 posted on 06/14/2003 7:27:27 PM PDT by Jim Noble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm
LOL!!! I couldn't believe it -- I was talking to someone on IM and told them I thought I saw Clinton but had to go back and check -- one quick look and changed channels the second time. Some bald headed guy was with him but didn't stay around long enough to see who it was.

10 posted on 06/14/2003 7:27:40 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
But how best to explain the Right’s, well, low grade obsession with the Clintons?

----------------------

1) Because the Clintons represent most of what has been wrong with this nation for the last nearly 40 years.

2) Because it is infuriating that the Clintons are not questioned in critical places where it counts, Eighty-nine percent of the Washington press corps voted for the Clintons and support the clintons.

11 posted on 06/14/2003 7:29:36 PM PDT by RLK
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Exactly. You don't see the media asking Bush I his opinion on every freakin' thing that goes on.. but they sure seem to find out and print Clintons reactions to things, don't they?

Just like that brain dead slut, Paula Zahn, who cheered, on TV when a state was called for Gore during the last elections, they are so biased that they can't even comprehend that they are biased.
12 posted on 06/14/2003 7:31:43 PM PDT by LaraCroft ('Bout time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
Well, it's not positive, but it's not nearly as negative as it might be. Michiko Kakutani is a very smart reviewer, but she stumbles around in this review as if she can hardly put her mind to it or can hardly admit what the real problems are.

Surely nobody could be stupid enough to read Hillary Clinton in order to find out the truth. As for the "right," we will continue to be "obsessed" by the clintons as long as long as they continue to run one of the country's two major parties and obviously plan to put Hillary in the White House. We're supposed to ignore something as big as that? Or ignore the way the press continues to spin and lie for these scum?

The real reason people are obsessed by the clintons is that they can't help wondering how many crimes can these people can commit and still retain the loyal subservience of at least third of our country? The clintons are the very essence of America's liberal decay, and as long as the liberals continue to lick their toes they will continue to be in the spotlight.
13 posted on 06/14/2003 7:32:59 PM PDT by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
"But how best to explain the Right’s, well, low grade obsession with the Clintons? It has never seemed to ebb, only flow, and it has lead to the most recent wave of accusations that the Right has nothing better to do than relive the entire Clinton administration."

Yup. I even make popcorn to munch along with this Soap. Hey, I love to see them singlehandedly burning the entire democrat party. I just can't wait. Bill was on Larry King tonight spreading somemore napalm all over the ~other white meat~ you know, the guys who think they are running against GW. Actually, they are still running against Clinton for the party nomination.

Pass the chips.
14 posted on 06/14/2003 7:35:27 PM PDT by OpusatFR (Using pretentious arcane words to buttress your argument means you don't have one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rs79bm; PhiKapMom
HA! .. I beat you both .. I never turned it on
15 posted on 06/14/2003 7:37:16 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
LOL!!! That will teach me to not include CNN when flipping through channels!
16 posted on 06/14/2003 7:39:33 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: az4vlad
"Maybe because the Clintons have left so many very relevant questions unanswered, a thing that irritates those who care about or examine relevant presidencies."

Bill Clinton broke the law and the Republicans let him off the hook

Al Gore Broke The Law and Republicans let him off the hook.

What we need is the tough Newt Gingrich back.

"As far back as April 7, 1998, then-House Speaker Newt Gingrich was asked on NBC’s Today if he were going to press for impeachment. His response: "No, we don’t have any evidence."
Source.

"I don’t care if you have proof that he raped a woman, stood up and shot her dead, you’re still not going to get 67 votes."

Bush Says He Wants to Let Clinton 'Move On'
"Listen, here's my view: I think it's time to get all of this business behind us. I think it's time ... to allow the president to finish his term, and let him move on and enjoy life and become an active participant in the American system. And I think we've had enough focus on the past. It's time to move forward." - George W. Bush.

Bush Won't Dwell On Clinton Affair, "We're Moving Forward"
"B/S, Mr Bush. Clinton is a criminal and a traitor. We demand a thorough investigation and prosecution. Our Republic is dead and our liberty is at stake if the next administration does not clean up this mess for now and forever more. Corrupt politicians must pay the price for subverting our Constitution and using their offices for personal gain."
4 Posted on 01/20/2000 14:17:56 PST by Jim Robinson

Rah, Rah, Rah

17 posted on 06/14/2003 7:42:39 PM PDT by Uncle Bill
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
See how easy that is .. LOL

Actually I saw the commerical promoting it earlier and I remembered to avoid CNN tonight ..

Oh BTW .. her name was Charlotte Dawson
18 posted on 06/14/2003 7:42:42 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Mo1
Thanks for that info!

I didn't realize the slime was going to be on! I can see why you avoided CNN tonight!
19 posted on 06/14/2003 7:46:28 PM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: PhiKapMom
Warning .. Hellary will be on tomorrow night
20 posted on 06/14/2003 7:47:11 PM PDT by Mo1 (I'm a monthly Donor .. You can be one too!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson