[livius]

Very interesting. Did anybody see the article in Friday's Wall Street Journal by Mary Anastasia O'Grady asking why the (US) State Department had declared the main opposition figure to Chavez, a military man, to be a "terrorist"? Sigh.

If the US would just get behind the right side on this issue, I think Chavez would be gone very, very soon. The question is, will we?

[dsc]

"...why the (US) State Department had declared the main opposition figure to Chavez, a military man, to be a "terrorist"?"

Choose the correct answer:

a. Because the US State Department is the only group that can mount a serious challenge to the French for the title, "Snail-eating surrender sissies."

b. Because Tail-Gunner Joe was right, and the US State Department has been a viper's nest of anti-Americanism for decades.

c. Because at the State Department, you don't need to either ask or tell; you jusk *know*.

d. Highest rate of two-time Clinton voters of any organization on the planet.

e. All of the above, and more.