Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Pedophiles Seek Online Support, Societal Acceptance
CNSNews.com ^ | 6/13/03 | Steve Brown

Posted on 06/13/2003 8:17:51 AM PDT by kattracks

(Editor's Note: Contains information some readers may find objectionable.)

(CNSNews.com) - There's something for everyone on the Internet - even for pedophiles who seek support and acceptance for their fixation on children.

Some of the websites that "celebrate" adults' love for minor children are very careful to monitor their content so they don't break any laws. Pornographic images, erotic literature and other sexually explicit content are nowhere to be found on these sites, but advocates for children find them very troubling nevertheless.

At the website Girl Love Garden, pedophiles claim to be on a quest for social acceptance of their sexual preferences. The website celebrates "the emancipation of girls of all ages and 'girl love,' in general."

The website notes that "true emancipation" lies "in a child's sublime assent to becoming self actualized with the keen-eyed help of a loving mentor (gardener) who is willing to carefully fertilize and tend to the growth of the emotions, spirit and intellectual flora of the garden of a child's soul."

The committee's mission statement offers the view that adults who are "naturally, sensuously attracted to little girls and blossoming young women…will achieve full emancipation only by clothing their souls with a childlike personality and agreeing to 'play safe' with each other…"

Here visitors find "an oasis of shade" among the "refreshing waters of reason" where they are invited to "drink deeply of the exquisite delights to be found herein by Girl Lovers everywhere."

But "boy lovers" need not feel left out. At the Free Spirits website, visitors learn that "boylovers have not chosen of their free will to become so."

"It is an attraction most discover within themselves at a very early age," the site explains. "Through no action of their own, they find themselves considered horrible and vile. Most people who are attracted to minors try to live good lives but find no encouragement from a society and a press that labels all people with that attraction, whatever they do or don't do, as evil monsters," the web site says.

Developers of "BoyChat," the chat room at Free Spirits, admit it is not a place where "well-meaning social workers firmly guide people the way they think they ought to go."

BoyChat says it is run "by boylovers for boylovers." It encourages people posting on the website "to work freely through their own issues and questions."

Anonymity

The operators of both the Free Spirits and Girl-Love Garden websites are free to express their views because of the anonymity of the Internet. There are many other online sites catering to "MAAs" (minor-attracted adults, which some pedophiles prefer to call themselves).

Such websites claim to advocate for the civil rights and acceptance of "the most underserved and misunderstood sexual minority remaining in today's human society," according to the Free Spirits mission statement.

Along with chat rooms, these sites include members' galleries, where visitors find personal, historical and literary insights on loving children; and message boards where visitors may discuss issues involving the emotional, romantic and sexual relationships between children and adults.

'Legal'

According to Barry Maddox, spokesperson for the FBI's Baltimore, Md., office, the sites are "totally legal." Maddox told CNSNews.com the sites come close to breaking the law but do not break it."They've done their homework," Maddox said.

Pornographic images, literature or any other sexually explicit content are nowhere to be found on these sites.

"Girl Moments," or stories describing an encounter with a female adolescent that are "tasteful," "well-written," and focus on "friendships or other light-hearted encounters" are welcome at Girl-Love Garden, according to its frequently asked questions (FAQ) section. But it warns visitors not to "include details that evoke a prurient interest in sexual relations.

"Written materials that appear erotic or that advocate or counsel engaging in sexual activity with a minor constitutes a very serious offence" under the criminal codes of Canada, the U.S. and the United Kingdom, the FAQ warns, adding that "your material must be in full compliance with these laws so that when viewed with a prejudicial eye, they could not be seen as openly advocating, counseling, inducing, nor encouraging sexual intimacy with minors."

"We're only interested in those who act upon these impulses," Maddox said. While legal, he added, the sites "do make me sick to my stomach."

Ruben Rodriguez, director of the Exploited Children Unit at the National Center for Missing and Exploited Children, told CNSNews.com that while he likes the Internet, sites such as Free Spirits and Girl-Love Garden "have turned sections of it into a sewer."

"Many of these pedophiles act out on their impulses," Rodriguez said. "These kinds of sites are not something I would welcome."

Rodriguez said all the disclaimers and attempts at de-stigmatizing the "deviant sexual behavior" of pedophiles online are "just excuses" for them to "sit in front of a monitor and masturbate." He expressed "disgust" at the notion of society accepting pedophiles as another minority group.

"I see us sometimes going down a different path," Rodriguez said. "I don't see it getting better, I see it getting worse...going in a direction sometimes that just drives me crazy."

Some MAAs claiming to be Christians say they have found comfort at a website called Philia, which provides news and resources to religious support groups for adults who are attracted to minors. Philia, along with the Christian Boylove Forum (CBLF), are for those who "find themselves in the position of having no one to turn to who shares their faith as well as their sexual feelings.

"This (online message) board attempts to fill that gap by providing a friendly, safe place where we can be honest about our feelings and struggles with sexuality and faith, without fear of destructive criticism or harassment," the CBLF site states. "This is a place for mutual encouragement, support and advice as we seek to deal with our sexuality and society's reaction to it in responsible and healthy ways, to live out our lives with integrity and to express our faith in a way that honors God and demonstrates the love of Jesus Christ to all people."

Both sites are run by "Bach" - the screen name used to protect his identity - a boy lover who told CNSNews.com via e-mail that he has never acted upon his feelings and that he found support through a Christian service agency with which he volunteered.

"I am in a committed relationship with another man and have found that I am able to gain some satisfaction with this compromise," Bach wrote. "We discussed the fact that many message boards didn't allow for a Christian boylover to explore his faith in the context of his sexuality. We were often confronted with boylovers who had a strong hatred for the church, and we were constantly defending ourselves. This was the impetus to form the Christian Boylove Forum."

From CBLF sprung "Christian Consultations," "an annual gathering to bring together Christians (and some non-Christians) who are willing to enter into dialogue about adult attraction to minors," according to the Philia website.

"We have had involvement at the Christian Consultation from various pastors, Christian service workers, members of...Parents, Families and Friends of Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual and Transgendered Persons," Bach stated in the e-mail to CNSNews.com. "The goal of these encounters was to provide a non-threatening place for dialogue ...to help break isolation and fear.

"I would hope that Christians could come to accept that minor-attracted adults are not monsters, not sex maniacs, not uncontrolled freaks, but folks who have to live their lives with a desire that is demonized by society and the media to an extent that they are fearful to speak of it to anyone," Bach explained.

Julie Posey, a self-described "cyber-crime fighter" runs the website Pedowatch.org. Posey's website claims that "since 1996, she has passed on hundreds of tips to law enforcement involving child sexual predators who use the Internet as a tool to gain access to children who are later sexually assaulted and in rare instances murdered."

Posey is also the author of They Call Me Kendra, which Pedowatch.org describes as an autobiography of "her life experiences as a sexually abused child and tells how she later became one of the nation's leading experts on child sexual predators."

Kendra was the onscreen name Posey used to trap sexual predators online. She told CNSNews.com that Christian Consultation sounded a lot like prison ministers who work with convicted pedophiles.

"They go into prisons and try to help the families," Posey said. "They say, 'Oh, what your loved one did isn't so wrong...he has a love for boys,' and they try to get them (the family) to accept it. But they're trying to get all of society to just accept it, and it's unacceptable to me."

Posey said sites like Free Spirits and Girl-Love Garden are "just working to make their stories sound good.

"I read the North American Man Boy Lovers Association's manifesto one time, and they were like 'sex is actually good for kids,'...well, I can tell you it's not," Posey said. "If society doesn't get a grip right now - and even right now it's going to be difficult, they are definitely going to have the same rights that we have."

E-mail a news tip to Steve Brown.

Send a Letter to the Editor about this article.




TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ephebophilia; gay; homosexual; homosexualagenda; internet; lesbian; molestation; nambla; pedophilia; perversion; prisoners
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 361-375 next last
To: Dolphy
Hardly. Pedophiles endanger minors.

Do you walk to school or carry your lunch?

Show me anywhere that I suggested that either caused the same harm.

I said they made the same statements and their statements were as invalid for pedophiles as for homosexuals.

Shalom.

221 posted on 06/14/2003 7:53:51 PM PDT by ArGee (I did not come through fire and death to bandy crooked words with a serving-man... - Gandalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 164 | View Replies]

To: Qwerty
So men who lust after men but do nothing about it are straight? Interesting.

Let me put that back to you. Is a married man who lusts after women not his wife committing adultery?

Gay is a sick behavior that needs to be changed. Fortunately, it can be changed. You can claim it's my opinion and disagree, but you would be better served to listen and seek help.

Shalom.

222 posted on 06/14/2003 7:57:42 PM PDT by ArGee (I did not come through fire and death to bandy crooked words with a serving-man... - Gandalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 177 | View Replies]

To: Qwerty
As for "fistgate", that whole thing is ridiculous, and if I'm not mistaken Camenker and Whitman are being sued for illegally taping the PRIVATE conference.

Here we go again. The information was factual and totally accurate. GLSEN presenters were teaching kids how to do fisting properly, but they're not the enemy. The people who brought the information to light are the enemy and need to be punished.

Suppose Camenker and Whitman had illegally taped a group of people planning to fly airplanes into the WTC on September 11, 2001. Would you be angry at them for telling the world?

Misdirection doesn't help in this instance.

Shalom.

223 posted on 06/14/2003 7:59:59 PM PDT by ArGee (I did not come through fire and death to bandy crooked words with a serving-man... - Gandalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 178 | View Replies]

To: Qwerty
Thousands SAY they left the lifestyle, but how many continue to fantasize about gay sex? How many are actually "gay" to begin with?

Some psychologist actually did a study. He found that they actually had been gay and actually have gone straight. He was surprised, he had started his research expecting to prove the opposite. He tried to get the APA to let him hold a discussion on the matter, but the gays shut it down because they don't want anyone knowing this dirty secret.

But you go on smearing those who are trying to help. That's all you know how to do, isn't it?

Somebody will remind us all of the psychiatrist's name.

Shalom.

224 posted on 06/14/2003 8:02:15 PM PDT by ArGee (I did not come through fire and death to bandy crooked words with a serving-man... - Gandalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 180 | View Replies]

To: gcruse
And who are these so-called "deity-eating religionists" you speak of? I already know your answer; do you have the courage to respond?
225 posted on 06/14/2003 8:20:18 PM PDT by Genesis defender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
Robert Spizter. I would consider him more of an activist than a psyhcologist but at least he is willing to say that those who are distessed with a homosexual orientation should not be denied therapy.

For years when someone who was attracted to the same sex told a therapist that they didn't want to be, that they wanted help, they were denied and told to get used to it. Then some wonder why others are depressed and suicidal. They are basically told they have no "choices" in their own life. Only political correctness.

Voluntary therapy should be there for those that seek it. Sadly GLBT, GLAAD & other activists don't care about real people. They have an agenda.
226 posted on 06/14/2003 8:20:59 PM PDT by kuma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]

To: Genesis defender
Why anybody who eats their god, of course. Yuck.
Is there something about cannabilism that is ennobling?
227 posted on 06/14/2003 8:26:50 PM PDT by gcruse (Superstition is a mind in chains.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 225 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
Do yourself a favor, and don't EVER challenge my character again.

Ok

228 posted on 06/14/2003 8:57:20 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
They are all behaviors.

Oh? Really?

229 posted on 06/14/2003 9:17:10 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 220 | View Replies]

To: kuma
However, just because you disagree with other people, or in my case think you know more than other people ;OP, that doesn't translate into "bigot".

True. Only your and God know if your are a bigot. I can live with that. Can you?

230 posted on 06/14/2003 9:20:04 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 215 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon
Yep, I can. I know the intent behind what I say.
231 posted on 06/14/2003 9:41:41 PM PDT by kuma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 230 | View Replies]

To: Houmatt
You are such a moron!
Challenging your character is really very easy. You have some serious issues to deal with. You remind me a lot of Rev. Phelps from KS.
Here is your mindset: I'm an obsessed Bible Beater that absolutely loathes homosexuals and every thing they stand for.
Are you in denial?

232 posted on 06/14/2003 9:53:11 PM PDT by georgeisdaman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 219 | View Replies]

To: kuma
Yep, I can. I know the intent behind what I say.

Kool. Pax Vobiscum.

233 posted on 06/14/2003 10:01:58 PM PDT by Jeff Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: ArGee
I said they made the same statements and their statements were as invalid for pedophiles as for homosexuals.

In your mind they are invalid. However, how can they make the same argument when one starts from the premise of consenting adults and one from the premise of adults and children?

234 posted on 06/14/2003 10:17:45 PM PDT by Dolphy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 221 | View Replies]

To: georgeisdaman; Houmatt
You are such a moron!

I'm betting his IQ is somewhere north of 129, what’s yours?

Challenging your character is really very easy.

Why, what is your challenge exactly?

You have some serious issues to deal with.

Please list them.

You remind me a lot of Rev. Phelps from KS.

Oh? Does he remind you of your mother too? And why?

Here is your mindset: I'm an obsessed Bible Beater that absolutely loathes homosexuals and every thing they stand for.

Umm…where did he say, please cite his post, he hates ANYONE?

Are you in denial?

Of what, ad hominem from someone who can’t logically support their juvenile attack on a conservative? Do your parents know you’re on the Internet? But you da man dowg!

235 posted on 06/14/2003 10:40:12 PM PDT by Clint N. Suhks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon
Why does the fact that bigotry is evil bother you so very much?

You're going way off on a limb here. I am not a bigot; I am disucssing it because you are equating theoretical bigotry with pedophilia. I am saying that people who are prejudiced in their minds - or even in their speech - are NOTHING compared to pedophiles, especially as mentioned in the article that started this thread. Plus I don't consider bigotry if it is a mental attitude a huge evil. I personally don't expect everyone to love me, I don't get offended if people don't like my looks or my religion. In that sense, bigotry is stupid.

But if by bigotry you mean people who consider homosexual behavior unhealthy and unnatural, this isn't bigotry. it is using common sense.

236 posted on 06/15/2003 12:46:53 AM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon
Why does the fact that bigotry is evil bother you so very much?

You're going way off on a limb here. I am not a bigot; I am disucssing it because you are equating theoretical bigotry with pedophilia. I am saying that people who are prejudiced in their minds - or even in their speech - are NOTHING compared to pedophiles, especially as mentioned in the article that started this thread. Plus I don't consider bigotry if it is a mental attitude a huge evil. I personally don't expect everyone to love me, I don't get offended if people don't like my looks or my religion. In that sense, bigotry is stupid.

But if by bigotry you mean people who consider homosexual behavior unhealthy and unnatural, this isn't bigotry. it is using common sense.

237 posted on 06/15/2003 12:46:54 AM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Gordon
Why does the fact that bigotry is evil bother you so very much?

You're going way off on a limb here. I am not a bigot; I am disucssing it because you are equating theoretical bigotry with pedophilia. I am saying that people who are prejudiced in their minds - or even in their speech - are NOTHING compared to pedophiles, especially as mentioned in the article that started this thread. Plus I don't consider bigotry if it is a mental attitude a huge evil. I personally don't expect everyone to love me, I don't get offended if people don't like my looks or my religion. In that sense, bigotry is stupid.

But if by bigotry you mean people who consider homosexual behavior unhealthy and unnatural, this isn't bigotry. it is using common sense.

238 posted on 06/15/2003 12:47:00 AM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: pram
Sorry about the multiples, either my server or the internet is/was acting weird...
239 posted on 06/15/2003 12:53:00 AM PDT by First Amendment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]

To: pram
I am not a bigot;

That's nice.

240 posted on 06/15/2003 1:04:45 AM PDT by Jeff Gordon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 238 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260 ... 361-375 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson