Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

A nice, concise summary of quotes from all the Democrats who were sure that Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction.
1 posted on 06/11/2003 2:03:28 PM PDT by Political Numbers Guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: Political Numbers Guy
Thank you for the compilation. This is a keeper. Fox Alert!
2 posted on 06/11/2003 2:04:59 PM PDT by gathersnomoss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
Conservatives are once more suckered by the "sex". We should be using the Clinton-show to explain the real Clinton legacy: their threat to our national security.
CENTCOM - Daily:
*COALITION EFFORTS AID IRAQ’S RECOVERY (June 11, 2003)
*COALITION AND IRAQI POLICE WORK TO MAKE IRAQ SECURE (June 11, 2003)
 
Tales of Saddam's Brutality [lengthy, graphic, White House websight] (includes lengthy press/Senate e-mail contact list) 
White House -> various press. ^ | Updated regularly, latest - June 3, 2003
 
~~~

 
   VOICES OF FREEDOM
Quotes from the grateful Iraqi people. Y
~~~
 
***Operation Infinite Freedom - Sit Room - 11 JUN 03/Day 84***

3 posted on 06/11/2003 2:13:54 PM PDT by Ragtime Cowgirl ("The American people are proud of you and God bless each of you." Rummy to troops in Iraq)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
bump for later
4 posted on 06/11/2003 2:15:24 PM PDT by IYAS9YAS (Go Fast, Turn Left!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
BTTT
5 posted on 06/11/2003 2:17:27 PM PDT by Mark17
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
Which leads to another question.. if all of the saw the same intellegence.. and all believed it. Was the CIA and DIA full of crap?
6 posted on 06/11/2003 2:24:10 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
As an add on to the last post. Did it become harder for the CIA and DIA to estimate the weapons of mass destruction? Was Iraq able to hide the facts better in 2003 then back in 1998? Was funding of CIA and DIA a problem? You could go a million different directions with this. But a quote from Democrats in 1998 has no bearing on 2003. Now Hillary and Bill and other leading Democrats saying that intellengce still shows they have them in 2002-2003 does and that all leads to the questions above.
7 posted on 06/11/2003 2:28:08 PM PDT by Almondjoy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
Hehehehehehe..........they can't hide any more!
8 posted on 06/11/2003 2:33:12 PM PDT by Sunshine Sister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
ALSO POSTED HERE

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/927069/posts
9 posted on 06/11/2003 2:34:08 PM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
Of course this recent attack on the President is bovine excrement, but it's pretty much all they got right now. The economy is charging to a real rebound and the war on terror is going as well as can be expected, so the RATS are losing it. They are throwing sh!t against the wall to see if it sticks. The only trouble with that is that sh!t only sticks on that wall if it's fresh, smelly and soft (that's not my opinion folks, it's the laws of physics). That means that you will always, always get some on yourself.
10 posted on 06/11/2003 2:35:25 PM PDT by timydnuc (FR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
Bump for later find.

Regards

alfa6 ;>}
11 posted on 06/11/2003 2:36:10 PM PDT by alfa6 (GNY Highway's Rules: Improvise; Adapt; Overcome)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
The Bush admin didn't lie, plenty of highly radioactive material found around Iraq.
12 posted on 06/11/2003 3:02:39 PM PDT by weikel (Baghdad Bob for DNC chairman, Sharpton for Dem nominee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion
FYI
14 posted on 06/11/2003 3:26:43 PM PDT by MizSterious (Support whirled peas!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
Outstanding!

Big bump!
19 posted on 06/11/2003 3:49:39 PM PDT by MonroeDNA (Unions and Marxists say, " Workers of the world unite!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, Madeline Albright, Robert Byrd, Jacques Chirac, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Tom Daschle, Dick Gephardt, Al Gore, Bob Graham, Ted Kennedy, and Nancy Pelosi. All proven Liers. I don't believe Bush, and I don't believe these clowns. Try again.

It is a fact that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, They used chemical weapons in the Iran Iraq war, and in attacks against the Kurds and others after the First Persian Gulf War. He also had a nuclear program, a program what was ended by the Isrealis. However, between the attacks following the First Persian Gulf war and the Second Persian Gulf War, Saddam somehow got rid of his entire weapons program. It's not a matter of Saddam having a weapons program and weapons in Iraq, he clearly does not, It's a matter of where did his weapons go during the 90's.

22 posted on 06/11/2003 8:22:48 PM PDT by theKing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
Bump
24 posted on 06/12/2003 4:57:25 AM PDT by Robert DeLong
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Political Numbers Guy
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security."

-- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002
26 posted on 06/13/2003 8:46:34 AM PDT by finnman69 (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson