A nice, concise summary of quotes from all the Democrats who were sure that Iraq had Weapons of Mass Destruction.
To: Political Numbers Guy
Thank you for the compilation. This is a keeper. Fox Alert!
To: Political Numbers Guy
Conservatives are once more suckered by the "sex". We should be using the Clinton-show to explain the real Clinton legacy: their threat to our national security.
CENTCOM - Daily:
~~~
~~~
3 posted on
06/11/2003 2:13:54 PM PDT by
Ragtime Cowgirl
("The American people are proud of you and God bless each of you." Rummy to troops in Iraq)
To: Political Numbers Guy
bump for later
4 posted on
06/11/2003 2:15:24 PM PDT by
IYAS9YAS
(Go Fast, Turn Left!)
To: Political Numbers Guy
BTTT
5 posted on
06/11/2003 2:17:27 PM PDT by
Mark17
To: Political Numbers Guy
Which leads to another question.. if all of the saw the same intellegence.. and all believed it. Was the CIA and DIA full of crap?
6 posted on
06/11/2003 2:24:10 PM PDT by
Almondjoy
To: Political Numbers Guy
As an add on to the last post. Did it become harder for the CIA and DIA to estimate the weapons of mass destruction? Was Iraq able to hide the facts better in 2003 then back in 1998? Was funding of CIA and DIA a problem? You could go a million different directions with this. But a quote from Democrats in 1998 has no bearing on 2003. Now Hillary and Bill and other leading Democrats saying that intellengce still shows they have them in 2002-2003 does and that all leads to the questions above.
7 posted on
06/11/2003 2:28:08 PM PDT by
Almondjoy
To: Political Numbers Guy
Hehehehehehe..........they can't hide any more!
To: Political Numbers Guy
9 posted on
06/11/2003 2:34:08 PM PDT by
finnman69
(!)
To: Political Numbers Guy
Of course this recent attack on the President is bovine excrement, but it's pretty much all they got right now. The economy is charging to a real rebound and the war on terror is going as well as can be expected, so the RATS are losing it. They are throwing sh!t against the wall to see if it sticks. The only trouble with that is that sh!t only sticks on that wall if it's fresh, smelly and soft (that's not my opinion folks, it's the laws of physics). That means that you will always, always get some on yourself.
10 posted on
06/11/2003 2:35:25 PM PDT by
timydnuc
(FR)
To: Political Numbers Guy
Bump for later find.
Regards
alfa6 ;>}
11 posted on
06/11/2003 2:36:10 PM PDT by
alfa6
(GNY Highway's Rules: Improvise; Adapt; Overcome)
To: Political Numbers Guy
The Bush admin didn't lie, plenty of highly radioactive material found around Iraq.
12 posted on
06/11/2003 3:02:39 PM PDT by
weikel
(Baghdad Bob for DNC chairman, Sharpton for Dem nominee)
To: Ernest_at_the_Beach; FairOpinion
FYI
14 posted on
06/11/2003 3:26:43 PM PDT by
MizSterious
(Support whirled peas!)
To: Political Numbers Guy
Outstanding!
Big bump!
19 posted on
06/11/2003 3:49:39 PM PDT by
MonroeDNA
(Unions and Marxists say, " Workers of the world unite!")
To: Political Numbers Guy
Joe Lieberman, Dianne Feinstein, Barbara A. Milulski, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, Madeline Albright, Robert Byrd, Jacques Chirac, Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Tom Daschle, Dick Gephardt, Al Gore, Bob Graham, Ted Kennedy, and Nancy Pelosi. All proven Liers. I don't believe Bush, and I don't believe these clowns. Try again.
It is a fact that Iraq had weapons of mass destruction, They used chemical weapons in the Iran Iraq war, and in attacks against the Kurds and others after the First Persian Gulf War. He also had a nuclear program, a program what was ended by the Isrealis. However, between the attacks following the First Persian Gulf war and the Second Persian Gulf War, Saddam somehow got rid of his entire weapons program. It's not a matter of Saddam having a weapons program and weapons in Iraq, he clearly does not, It's a matter of where did his weapons go during the 90's.
22 posted on
06/11/2003 8:22:48 PM PDT by
theKing
To: Political Numbers Guy
Bump
To: Political Numbers Guy
"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security."
-- Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002
26 posted on
06/13/2003 8:46:34 AM PDT by
finnman69
(!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson