Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Oh, great !! They say I do, but I say Yuck!!!

I heard this on the radio a few minutes ago. I can't believe it's not posted already. (I did search).

1 posted on 06/11/2003 5:25:36 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: *Homosexual Agenda

More bump images HERE !

2 posted on 06/11/2003 5:27:12 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Can't they all just get back in the closet? Why must we be asked to celebrate a personality disorder?
3 posted on 06/11/2003 5:31:41 AM PDT by Bigg Red (Bush/Cheney in '04 and Tommy Daschole out the door)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl; onyx; SpookBrat; Republican Wildcat; Howlin; Fred Mertz; dixiechick2000; SusanUSA; ...
Holy Cow !! I don't know what else to say.

Gay couple married after ruling (Toronto, Canada)

MICHAEL STUPARYK/TORONTO STAR
Michael Stark, left, and Michael Lashner pop champagne
and kiss after their wedding ceremony yesterday.
Leshner called the ruling, "Day One for millions of gays
and lesbians around the world."



Please let me know if you want ON or OFF my General Interest ping list!. . .don't be shy.


4 posted on 06/11/2003 5:33:28 AM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
The ability to marry, and to thereby participate in this fundamental societal institution

Go ahead you dirty perverts. Further the human race and have children.

All future rulings toward these vile, dirty animals should be based on what I think is a fundamental reason for the union in the first place.

TO HAVE CHILDREN AND CONTRIBUTE TOWARD THE FUTURE OF CIVILIZATION You dirty perverts use you sex tools and stick them in every hole that will produce nothing. Your even to stupid to realize if every one would practice you perverse cult practices you would eliminate the human race. What bunch low life, stinking bottom feeders.

5 posted on 06/11/2003 5:34:17 AM PDT by chachacha
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Just hours before, the Ontario Court of Appeal rewrote the definition of marriage to include same-sex couples, saying denying gays and lesbians the ability to marry offends their dignity,i>

Lets talk about the dignity of a man on his hands and knees with another man jamming his.... Well you get the point.

10 posted on 06/11/2003 5:38:58 AM PDT by biblewonk (Spose to be a Chrisssssstian)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing

13 posted on 06/11/2003 5:40:57 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I will defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Then, the happy couple celebrated by going cruising in the bars and picking up a few more guys!

Gay men are not interested in a monogamous relationship. They say that themselves. They get very angry when anyone suggests that the best thing to do is to be in a monogamous relationship! So, this "Marriage" thing is just a farce.

The only reason they want to get "married" is to force the rest of the world to accept their abonormal behavior. They know they are abonormal, but think it is everyone else who makes them feel that way. They have the misguided opinion that acceptence by others will make them feel more normal. That the image of a normal homelife will make them feel more normal. Fact is, they are not normal, and none of these things will change how they feel!



They are trying to legislate immorality!
14 posted on 06/11/2003 5:41:02 AM PDT by tuckrdout
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Next in line, pedophiles, incestuous types, group sex, animal lovers, etc. Who says that they are any less deserving than these two guys?
18 posted on 06/11/2003 5:46:35 AM PDT by jim_trent
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
I'm wondering what country we will be forced to invade first in the future, Canada or Mexico.
26 posted on 06/11/2003 6:15:45 AM PDT by He Rides A White Horse (For or against us.........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Freedom.

Gays have existed since the time of the Bible.

What is your solution? To eradicate them all as Hitler tried to do?

To spend billions of dollars on fruitless (Pardon the pun) endeavours to therapeutically turn them into heterosexuals?

Give them their own island somewhere?

Make them watch Clint Eastwood movies until they turned macho?

Live and let live, they're not harming anyone, I hope they're happy, isn't that what everyone wants?

Would Jesus approve of the frankly boorish comments I've read in this thread? Afterall, he befriended Mary Magdelaine, and spent time with lepers.

27 posted on 06/11/2003 6:55:46 AM PDT by IvanT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
...but I say Yuck!!!

That was my first reaction.

34 posted on 06/11/2003 7:29:19 AM PDT by blackbart1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
The next types of marriages to be legalized in Canada:

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/926941/posts

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/926810/posts
36 posted on 06/11/2003 7:30:43 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Congratulations to Bruce and Antoine.
37 posted on 06/11/2003 7:30:54 AM PDT by Conservative til I die (They say anti-Catholicism is the thinking man's anti-Semitism; that's an insult to thinking men)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
I wish the new (old) couple the best.
43 posted on 06/11/2003 8:35:08 AM PDT by Qwerty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
Genesis 19

The two angels arrived at Sodom in the evening, and Lot was sitting in the gateway of the city. When he saw them, he got up to meet them and bowed down with his face to the ground.

"My lords," he said, "please turn aside to your servant's house. You can wash your feet and spend the night and then go on your way early in the morning."

"No," they answered, "we will spend the night in the square."

But he insisted so strongly that they did go with him and entered his house. He prepared a meal for them, baking bread without yeast, and they ate. Before they had gone to bed, all the men from every part of the city of Sodom-both young and old-surrounded the house.

They called to Lot, "Where are the men who came to you tonight? Bring them out to us so that we can have sex with them."

Lot went outside to meet them and shut the door behind him and said, "No, my friends. Don't do this wicked thing. Look, I have two daughters who have never slept with a man. Let me bring them out to you, and you can do what you like with them. But don't do anything to these men, for they have come under the protection of my roof."

"Get out of our way," they replied. And they said, "This fellow came here as an alien, and now he wants to play the judge! We'll treat you worse than them." They kept bringing pressure on Lot and moved forward to break down the door. But the men inside reached out and pulled Lot back into the house and shut the door. Then they struck the men who were at the door of the house, young and old, with blindness so that they could not find the door.

The two men said to Lot, "Do you have anyone else here-sons-in-law, sons or daughters, or anyone else in the city who belongs to you? Get them out of here, because we are going to destroy this place. The outcry to the LORD against its people is so great that he has sent us to destroy it."

So Lot went out and spoke to his sons-in-law, who were pledged to marry his daughters. He said, "Hurry and get out of this place, because the LORD is about to destroy the city!" But his sons-in-law thought he was joking.

With the coming of dawn, the angels urged Lot, saying, "Hurry! Take your wife and your two daughters who are here, or you will be swept away when the city is punished."

When he hesitated, the men grasped his hand and the hands of his wife and of his two daughters and led them safely out of the city, for the LORD was merciful to them. As soon as they had brought them out, one of them said, "Flee for your lives! Don't look back, and don't stop anywhere in the plain! Flee to the mountains or you will be swept away!"

But Lot said to them, "No, my lords, please! Your servant has found favor in your eyes, and you have shown great kindness to me in sparing my life. But I can't flee to the mountains; this disaster will overtake me, and I'll die. Look, here is a town near enough to run to, and it is small. Let me flee to it-it is very small, isn't it? Then my life will be spared."

He said to him, "Very well, I will grant this request too; I will not overthrow the town you speak of. But flee there quickly, because I cannot do anything until you reach it." (That is why the town was called Zoar.) By the time Lot reached Zoar, the sun had risen over the land. Then the LORD rained down burning sulfur on Sodom and Gomorrah-from the LORD out of the heavens. Thus he overthrew those cities and the entire plain, including all those living in the cities-and also the vegetation in the land. But Lot's wife looked back, and she became a pillar of salt.


51 posted on 06/11/2003 10:59:43 AM PDT by Aquinasfan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yall
For any of you legal beagles out there, here is the link to the court ruling regarding this decision:

Halpern et al. v. Attorney General of Canada et al.


I got an e-mail alert today and that was in it.

59 posted on 06/11/2003 2:48:57 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: yall
Related article:

http://www.reuters.com/newsArticle.jhtml?type=topNews&storyID=2906422


Canada Court Redefines Marriage to Include Gays
Tue June 10, 2003 11:38 AM ET
OTTAWA (Reuters) - An Ontario court set aside the heterosexual definition of marriage on Tuesday with immediate effect and ordered the Toronto city clerk to issue marriage licenses to several gay couples who had applied for them.

The decision was one of three decisions expected this year by appeals courts in provinces across the country, and it was not clear whether the federal government would appeal it or ask for a stay of the decision.

A decision in May by a British Columbia appeals court had given the federal government until July 2004 to change its law to include homosexual marriages, and Justice Minister Martin Cauchon said he was mulling an appeal.

But the Ontario court ruled that to wait would deny the couples their constitutional rights, and it redefined the common law definition of marriage as "the voluntary union for life of two persons to the exclusion of all others."

In so doing it substituted "two persons" for "one man and one woman."

The three-person court ruled that the law limiting marriage to heterosexuals violated the 1982 Charter of Rights and Freedoms, part of the Canadian Constitution.

 RELATED ARTICLES
Toronto to Start Issuing Gay Marriage Licenses
"The common law definition of marriage is inconsistent with the Charter to the extent that it excludes same-sex couples," the court ruled.

Cauchon had asked the House of Commons justice committee to conduct hearings across the country on what should be done about the definition of marriage, and the committee is currently deliberating possible recommendations.

Committee member Vic Toews of the opposition Canadian Alliance, an opponent of gay marriage, asked Cauchon last week to launch an urgent appeal to the Supreme Court so that the lower courts do not end up preempting what he said was an issue for Parliament to decide.


60 posted on 06/11/2003 2:56:15 PM PDT by MeekOneGOP (Bu-bye Dixie Chimps! / Check out my Freeper site !: http://home.attbi.com/~freeper/wsb/index.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: MeeknMing
I am very confused on one aspect of homosexual "marriage". We all know what it means to consummate a heterosexual marriage. Homosexuals have only acts of sodomy available to them. So with 2 males,is consummation anal sex or oral sex? Can the "marriage" be annulled for nonconsummation if one of the 2 participants is always on the receiving or giving end or turns down the other participant for a certain form of sodomy? Same with 2 females. If one refuses to wear the strap-on or be the recipient of it, or if one is only on the giving or receiving end of oral, can the "marriage" be annulled? Has this been thought out in the US or Canada?
62 posted on 06/11/2003 4:09:17 PM PDT by sensie8
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson