Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bradlee Reveals Clinton Marriage Still a Sham
NewsMax.com ^ | 6/11/03 | Carl Limbacher and NewsMax.com Staff

Posted on 06/11/2003 12:03:28 AM PDT by kattracks

Former Washington Post editor Ben Bradlee stunned Larry King Tuesday night when he revealed that Bill and Hillary Clinton continue to have a sham marriage.

Bradlee, as well as presidential historian Michael Beschloss, was interviewed by King immediately after King's CNN interview of Hillary Rodham Clinton.

But Bradlee threw King for a loop when he revealed one of Washington's best known secrets: Bill and Hillary have still not reconciled since the Lewinsky affair.

Asked by King if Bill Clinton could become "First Man" if Hillary were to make it back to the White House, Bradlee responded, "I don't know. I don't know, the condition of the marriage, but it seems to me very difficult to pull this off. If they get back together again in any real way, I'd be stunned."

"If they get back together again" -- that's not what we heard on Barbara Walters this Sunday -- Hillary says she and Bill are suppose to be just one happy couple now.

King had a similar reaction to Bradlee's revelation: "You don't think they are a together couple?"

Bradlee stuck to his guns, answering King, "Well, I mean -- not by my definition."

Later in the interview Bradlee broached the subject of a possible Hillary-Bill divorce.

"Is there any possibility that -- do any of us feel that divorce is a possibility and she might try to run without him?" Bradlee asked King and Beschloss. Bradlee oversaw the Washington Post's coverage of Watergate and remains with his wife, society maven Sally Quinn, among the most well connected people in Washington.



TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: livinghistory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: eartotheground
[[Hillary being "shocked" by the Lewinsky matter is CRAP.]]

I thought that she was "shocked that he got caught".
41 posted on 06/11/2003 7:03:14 AM PDT by Wake Up America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: JoeSixPack1
That's right, Joe. I wouldn't put anything past these evil twins, the Klintons. I wouldn't trust them as far as I could throw em. Mxxx
42 posted on 06/11/2003 7:05:11 AM PDT by Marysecretary (GOD is still in control!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Wake Up America
It has pretty much been established that Hill had Bill tailed 24/7, then used muscle to keep the gals quite.

She knew!!! She knew!!!

43 posted on 06/11/2003 7:13:59 AM PDT by gov_bean_ counter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: The Raven
I think the purpose of the book is $8 million. Of course she can't tell the truth because of the 5th amendment.

She'll run in 2008 because it's too risky to run against an incumbant with good poll numbers. Meanwhile the Clintoons have to stay in the media so that no democrat can have a decent shot at the wh in 2004.

44 posted on 06/11/2003 7:17:29 AM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: gaspar
I have not heard them being together in public for a long time, either.

We also know that, when they are together in private, Hitlery usually ends up molesting Slick, using lamp posts, plates, and who knows what else.:)

45 posted on 06/11/2003 7:18:06 AM PDT by TigerLikesRooster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Keith in Iowa
I thinnk they each have a huge file on the other.
46 posted on 06/11/2003 7:49:13 AM PDT by tomswiftjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Destro
Since I don't know what Chris Rock had to say on his CD, would you please 'splain your post?

I'm sure it will be a doozie!! ;-)

g

47 posted on 06/11/2003 8:56:33 AM PDT by Geezerette (... but young at heart!-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: doodlelady
LOL! I should have scrolled down and read your post before I did mine!! Should be interesting, huh?

g

48 posted on 06/11/2003 8:58:46 AM PDT by Geezerette (... but young at heart!-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Momma Lou
I always figured that the Clintons had an open marriage. He chased after girls and so did she



I thought at least one of them always used a pimp. Seems Arkansas State Troopers work really well....
49 posted on 06/11/2003 9:03:36 AM PDT by BILL_C
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
If she were elected president, she would have a lesbian only white house.
50 posted on 06/11/2003 9:43:36 AM PDT by HaveGunWillTravel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: IFly4Him
Divorce him?
No, he's got too much dirt on her, and she has dirt on he as well.

He'll probably end up commiting 'suicide' or having som esort of 'accident'.
Possibly after finding out he has some sort of disease from one of his pecadillos.
51 posted on 06/11/2003 9:52:07 AM PDT by Darksheare (Nox aeternus en pax.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: mewzilla
Who wants a professional victim for president post 9-11? If the woman doesn't have the nads to make it on her own, how in heck can she say she's got the intestinal fortitude to defend the country? She can't. She's toast.

I agree with you -- she overplayed her victim hand big time. She was either too dumb with her head in the sand if she didn't know about Monica (don't believe that for a moment) which makes her too dumb and naive to deal with foreign countries in today's environment or if she did know (which I believe) and covered up -- she is a liar who this Country will not want as President.

The Clintons have overstayed their welcome on the world stage in this Country with the vast majority of people. When Susan Estrich goes after the Clintons and tells them to "shut-up" then they have really overstayed!

52 posted on 06/11/2003 10:12:12 AM PDT by PhiKapMom (Bush Cheney '04 - VICTORY IN '04 -- $4 for '04 - www.GeorgeWBush.com/donate/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: jrlc
Recognizing lesbians and gays was for the money and the vote. These couples are childless for the most part and have an abundance of cash - to spend where it would help them the most. What they bought is the right to be in the military; spurred on the same-sex marriage rights just for starters all the while reaping an enormous sum of money and votes for the DNC. Consenting adults can do what ever they want, whenever and wherever – that doesn’t make it right or that it is an accepted practice in the eyes of the Holy Father in any religion. The human body was made with procreation in mind with a he and a she; all else flirt with disease, irreparable harm to body and spirit.

Then there are the Boy Scouts of America, an American tradition which some have corrupted for selfish reasons and some states that are caving into the tearing down of such traditions. That is not right.

53 posted on 06/11/2003 10:41:50 AM PDT by yoe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Nobody's buying the crap Hillary is selling in this book. Even the reviewer at ultra-leftwing Newsday basically called the picture Hillary trys to paint of her life and her marriage a crock.
54 posted on 06/11/2003 11:12:33 AM PDT by beckett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: breakem
I think she's looking at 04. I don't think that she can wait til 08...too many things can change the landscape. There is no guarantee that Rudy won't run against her and if he does she's a goner. No, they've got something planned for this election cycle. I also don't think the Slick one wants to wait. He's just itching to get back on Air Force One!
55 posted on 06/11/2003 11:18:32 AM PDT by surrey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: surrey
Can't see her running against an incumbant unless we go into a depression or Bush goes on vacation with Arafat.
56 posted on 06/11/2003 11:20:19 AM PDT by breakem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: gov_bean_ counter
Her knowledge was the source of her power. She became queen when he was curled up on the couch in a fetal position after the Monica affair blew up. She openly ran the country after that.

Her main screaming and throwing fits seemed to be only when establishing power as they entered office together. Monica made Lady Macbeth's power unassailable.
57 posted on 06/11/2003 11:53:21 AM PDT by sine_nomine (I am pro-choice...the moment the baby has a choice.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Darksheare
In the News/Activism forum, on a thread titled Bradlee Reveals Clinton Marriage Still a Sham, Darksheare wrote:
"Divorce him?
No, he's got too much dirt on her, and she has dirt on he as well.

He'll probably end up commiting 'suicide' or having som esort of 'accident'.
Possibly after finding out he has some sort of disease from one of his pecadillos."

The only disease that would cause this welcome "final solution" to the Bill Clinton Question would be something incurable and terminal like full-blown AIDS.
I believe the reason he never released his medical records is they include diagnoses of sexually transmitted diseases. For someone this promiscuous, it would be truly amazing if he had managed to avoid this.
58 posted on 06/11/2003 12:27:01 PM PDT by JG52blackman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: IFly4Him
2) Divorce him after the Inauguration

Never in a billion years. The Clintons need to stay married for the reason that spousal communication is priviledged in a court of law. It's like lawyer-client or doctor-patient. As soon as their marriage "contract" is broken, they can be forced to testify against one another.

59 posted on 06/11/2003 12:31:18 PM PDT by jriemer (We are a Republic not a Democracy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: kattracks
Why do we trash the media (particular venom towards the post) and call them whores and claim that everything they say is spun at best or a lie, until we read something we like, and then it is the gospel.

Would we lend any credence to mr bradlee if he was commenting on the state of gwb's marriage?
60 posted on 06/11/2003 12:37:03 PM PDT by dmz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson