Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush 'Deeply Troubled' by Israeli Strike
AP ^ | 06/10/03 | SCOTT LINDLAW

Posted on 06/10/2003 7:37:43 AM PDT by Pokey78

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last
To: MoJo2001
I"m "deeply troubled" that President Bush is "deeply troubled" over this.

I'm deeply troubled about the Israeli strike as well. I'm deeply troubled because the strike didn't involve a high-yield nuclear weapon!

21 posted on 06/10/2003 8:00:16 AM PDT by FierceDraka ("I am not a number - I am a FREE MAN!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I don't like Bush using Daschlisms, but the Dems can't attacking him using those words. The hoots would be deafening.

BTW, I'm deeply sadded that the Israelis ........... missed.
22 posted on 06/10/2003 8:01:21 AM PDT by playball0 (Fortune favors the bold)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
With all the good technology out there, why are the Israeli's still blowing stuff up? If they could start using some nice food additives, sound wave devices, accidents in the home, killer prostitutes, and such, things would go a lot better for self defense.

But I guess then Hamas would just blow themselves up to still keep territory sentiment at a high insanity level? A day without a jew delivering some injustice toward a Palestinian is like a day without sunshine.

23 posted on 06/10/2003 8:02:00 AM PDT by blackdog ("Hey Lhama, how about something for the effort?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
Bush 'Deeply Troubled' by Israeli Strike

But not by the 4 Israelis killed? Which triggered the strike?

Remarkable!
Strange, even.

24 posted on 06/10/2003 8:02:25 AM PDT by Publius6961 (Californians are as dumm as a sack of rocks)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka
Easy to say when you are upwind by ten thousand miles!
25 posted on 06/10/2003 8:03:33 AM PDT by blackdog ("Hey Lhama, how about something for the effort?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
warning that such a strike "does not contribute to the security of Israel." .............


WANNA BET!!! Matter of fact Israel killed a Hizbuallah big shot back in 1989 with a helicopter rocket to his car, and it greatly changed events
26 posted on 06/10/2003 8:04:11 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
If Hamas isn't destroyed, then there will be no peace.

Who's going to do the job?

Not Abbas. Israel is going to have to do it.
27 posted on 06/10/2003 8:05:54 AM PDT by tomahawk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: FierceDraka
Wait! President Bush is actually "deeply concerned" and actually "deeply troubled" over this. LOL! Talk about wording! I'm just more annoyed by all of this, but your point is right on th mark. Woohoo!
28 posted on 06/10/2003 8:05:57 AM PDT by MoJo2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
There will be no peace regardless.
29 posted on 06/10/2003 8:08:27 AM PDT by Jason_b
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: MrsEmmaPeel
But Israel really screwed the pooch on this one, though. IMHO, Israel should have been able to take out the Hamas leader without so much collateral damage (bystanders). Now, most are very bad, but one of the casualties is an 8 year old girl now with brain damage.

There was not much collateral damage. 2 dead?? Anyway I'm in mourning for the Jews killed by such Jihadist filth in the past week.

You want some freaking collateral damage go check out those who get maimed and traumatized by the next suicide bomber

30 posted on 06/10/2003 8:08:34 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
I am deeply confused by President Bush right now.
31 posted on 06/10/2003 8:09:46 AM PDT by rintense (Thank you to all our brave soldiers, past and present, for your faithful service to our country.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tomahawk
Yup, Israel has to do the dirty work that Mazen will get assassinated for trying to do. That's if he cares to try which I doubt. Just the tired old good cop/bad cop routine by the Pallies. Hamas very bad so give away the store to Araft/Mazen the moderate Jew killers.
32 posted on 06/10/2003 8:11:15 AM PDT by dennisw
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
I used to harbor the same theory you do on this subject. I have since come to realize that the oil embargos create severe hardships for the states imposing them. They have become accustomed to the major cash flow oil sales generate, and when that cash flow is interrupted, they actually do feel it severely.

As for cutting our dependence, I think every new home in this nation should be self-sustaining, with other homes converted at the earliest opportunity. In my opinion we have allowed the power producers to subsidize an insane policy that sees them able to demand large fees when we would be better served if by different policies.

This would not only bring our energy problems under control, it would insulate us against attack on our major energy resources.
33 posted on 06/10/2003 8:16:53 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
President Bush scolded Israel on Tuesday for a helicopter attack on a senior Hamas leader that killed a bystander and a bodyguard, warning that such a strike "does not contribute to the security of Israel."

Bush then said, don't miss next time...

34 posted on 06/10/2003 8:19:34 AM PDT by American in Israel (Right beats wrong)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dennisw
You mis-read my post. I just said that the press will play up the 8 year old girl with brain damage and not ask the obvious question: "why was the attack necessary?" It would have been better had Israel just taken the Hamas leader out.
35 posted on 06/10/2003 8:21:20 AM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Frank_Discussion
If I were Israel I would set a date when terrorism was going to stop or else. I don't care what that date is, but if terrorism didn't stop I'd move the entire west bank population out of there. I would deport them and never allow them to return, end of story!

I can't imagine a condition where I would accept terrorism from a people sworn to destroy me without adopting such a policy. Irael either has a right to exist or it doesn't. I think it does. And I know I wouldn't put up with what they have.
36 posted on 06/10/2003 8:21:34 AM PDT by DoughtyOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
If I were Israel I would set a date when terrorism was going to stop or else. I don't care what that date is, but if terrorism didn't stop I'd move the entire west bank population out of there. I would deport them and never allow them to return, end of story!

I really think that is the only solution. I've often fancied a snatch and grab on Arafat, drop him off in Antarctica barefoot with a day's worth of rations.

37 posted on 06/10/2003 8:24:08 AM PDT by MrsEmmaPeel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Pokey78
There is a complicated game afoot here, something along the lines of good cop / bad cop.

It would be politically unwise at this time for the President to laugh out loud about the Pallies getting their a$$es kicked again.

IMHO, the game GW is up to involves giving the enemies every possible opportunity to redeem themselves by behaving as civilized people, which he knows (as does everyone else involved) they will not.

And once the olive branch has been refused, burned and broken one too many times, we will be justified (by world opinion) in allowing Israel to finish them off once and for all.

It's the old game of giving one's adversaries just enough rope to hang themselves.

If I'm wrong, then god help us all.

38 posted on 06/10/2003 8:24:36 AM PDT by FierceDraka ("I am not a number - I am a FREE MAN!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DoughtyOne
I agree with you. I'm just saying that the US Foreign Policy stance only makes sense if there is something else going on behind the scenes that we aren't privy to.

The issue with not angering OPEC is a non-starter for me. We have oil here, and we'll go get it, if need be. And if push comes to shove, Iraq has some reparations that can be addressed handily by it's oil. We will not be bent over on the oil issue.
39 posted on 06/10/2003 8:27:31 AM PDT by Frank_Discussion (May the wings of Liberty never lose a feather!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Mr. K
"The president is concerned that this strike will undermine efforts by Palestinian authorities to bring an end to terrorist attacks,..."

What a crock of $h!t

40 posted on 06/10/2003 8:28:55 AM PDT by MatthewViti
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 181-182 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson