With bugs in billions of items, do we have enough bandwith to take care of them ? We may need more satellites, transmitters, and fiberoptic cables.
On the other hand, stripping these bugs will be a major growth business. Thieves want to get rid of them before stealing these goods. People want to eliminate from their everyday items these bugs planted without their knowledge.
All of us could end up spending a lot of time, spying on others or freeing ourselves from such pesky bugs.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
To: TigerLikesRooster
"Tiny IDs can track almost anything (a bug in underwear)"
No bug could survive in my underwear.
2 posted on
06/09/2003 3:49:15 AM PDT by
Rebelbase
(........The bartender yells, "hey get out of here, we don't serve breakfast!")
To: TigerLikesRooster
All roads lead to the landfill.
To: TigerLikesRooster
It seems pretty easy to cut the tags out of clothing items but cars and things with embedded chips will be harder to deal with.
Between black boxes and embedded chips it sounds like used cars, etc. will be hot with folks who value privacy.
It really could be bad for some industies.
5 posted on
06/09/2003 4:26:58 AM PDT by
metesky
(Deathly afraid in Sheep (bleep) Falls, Maine)
To: TigerLikesRooster
So, is that a tracking device in your pants or are you just happy to see me?
13 posted on
06/09/2003 5:09:23 AM PDT by
uglybiker
(Studies have been found to be a leading cause of statistics)
To: TigerLikesRooster
"In the first Gulf war, they sent 20,000 containers and had to open 16,000 to find out what was inside," he said. Perhaps they should try reading the lables on the boxes. When I see such obvious self-justification, it raises red flags for me. I am sure there will be a nice market for home brew bug sniffers and emp neutralizers.
I find it interesting that police have to get a warrent to plant a bug, but a manufacturer does not.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Nothing that about 4 seconds in the microwave can't handle.
16 posted on
06/09/2003 5:29:15 AM PDT by
djf
To: TigerLikesRooster
With bugs in billions of items, do we have enough bandwith to take care of them ? We may need more satellites, transmitters, and fiberoptic cables.No. Part 15 RFID tags are a threat to all sorts of radio services - their emissions will splatter all over the spectrum, and will interfere with the very consumer electronics they are meant to track.
ARRL comments on RFID tags.
18 posted on
06/09/2003 5:34:16 AM PDT by
Chemist_Geek
("Drill, R&D, and conserve" should be our watchwords! Energy independence for America!)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Microwave your shorts
26 posted on
06/09/2003 6:47:29 AM PDT by
joesnuffy
(Moderate Islam Is For Dilettantes)
To: TigerLikesRooster
This is great! Now they can find out where your socks go in the laundry!
--Boris
27 posted on
06/09/2003 7:16:37 AM PDT by
boris
To: TigerLikesRooster
I'm sure Dianne Fineswine, Chuck Schumer and Hitlery like this idea. Just think of all of the guns & ammo that they would be able to track (for the good of the children!).
30 posted on
06/09/2003 8:54:05 AM PDT by
FreeInWV
To: TigerLikesRooster; #1CTYankee; .303 Brit; Agamemnon; AGBRUHN; always vigilant; Anarchist; ...
(Rev 13:16 KJV) And he causeth all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and bond, to receive a mark in their right hand, or in their foreheads:
(Rev 13:17 KJV) And that no man might buy or sell, save he that had the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name.
(Rev 13:18 KJV) Here is wisdom. Let him that hath understanding count the number of the beast: for it is the number of a man; and his number is Six hundred threescore and six.
To: TigerLikesRooster
Tiny IDs can track almost anything (a bug in underwear) Grossly misleading headline alert - re-written properly it would say: "Tiny IDs [allow] track[ing] [of] almost anything".
A certain level of supporing infrastructure is *still* required ...
33 posted on
06/09/2003 8:59:30 AM PDT by
_Jim
(http://www.biomedcentral.com/news/20030320/09/)
To: TigerLikesRooster
Well, I can see a lot of good coming out of this for businesses (costs going down with loss prevention) and for people looking for missing persons BUT it really makes me worry about misuse of it and who has access to knowing where me and my stuff is. I mean.. you wouldn't want a stalker being able to track you using your underwear. And there are a lot of intelligent criminals out there who will likely find a way to mess up the bugs and get around it.
35 posted on
06/09/2003 9:11:26 AM PDT by
honeygrl
To: TigerLikesRooster
Nano nannies. Crack spies.
39 posted on
06/09/2003 9:17:23 AM PDT by
Consort
To: TigerLikesRooster
Do not remove this microchip under penalty of law.
To: TigerLikesRooster
I don't wear underwear!
Nyah Nyah!
55 posted on
06/09/2003 9:50:29 AM PDT by
steplock
( http://www.spadata.com)
To: TigerLikesRooster
To: TigerLikesRooster
Geez, criminals will have a new way to make lots of money, just counterfeit a few of these chips and id theft will have a whole new meaning.
To: Thinkin' Gal
"We have the technology and a roadmap that takes us there," Mr. Pound said.
;^)
64 posted on
06/09/2003 12:04:40 PM PDT by
AnnaZ
(unspunwithannaz.blogspot.com... "It is UNSPUN and it is Unspun, but it is not unspun." -- unspun)
To: TigerLikesRooster
In the future I see a market for high-powered eletro-magnets.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson