[anncoulteriscool]

PING!

[Paleo Conservative]

The burden of proof was on Iraq. Iraq had to prove it did not have any banned WMD, we didn't have to prove they had them. All Iraq had to do was to allow inspectors to move freely around the country inspecting any facilities they wanted to at any time. Saddam did not let these types of inspections to occur as required by the cease fire agreement signed by both the US and Iraq at Saffwan in 1991.

[netmilsmom]

>>In his native tongue, weaselese<<

"Hey, Netmilsdad!! Could you please clean the Diet Coke out of this keyboard? Yeah, I WAS reading Ann again. Don't worry I'll E-mail it to you as soon as the keys dry."

[ChadGore]

[Rummyfan]

Way to go Ann!

I don't care because it's a fait accompli. What will be the result: reinstate Saddam Hussein?

[Gritty]

As Ann so adroitly points out, it is impossibly tiresome trying to make sense out of Liberals!

[Tacis]

"Should we apologize and return the country to Saddam Hussein and his winsome sons? Should we have him on "Designer's Challenge" to put his palaces back in all their '80s Vegas splendor? Or maybe Uday and Qusay could spruce up each other's rape rooms on a very special episode of "Trading Spaces"? What is liberals' point?"

As a liberal, I care a great deal. But the problem is even greater than not being able to find WMD. Bush and his army have, not only been unable to find weapons of mass destruction, they have been unable to find Saddam Hussein.

Us liberals believe that since the weapons haven't been found, THEY NEVER EXISTED. The logic is flawless!! Since Saddam has not been found, HE NEVER EXISTED. So, Bush has lied to us for years about the existance of Saddam. Us liberals have caught the government in yet another tricky spot. I've asked Waxman to write a letter demanding that the administration release documents proving that Saddam actually ever existed. We have to get to the bottom of this.

[tet68]

. The way they carry on, you would think they had caught the Bush administration in some shocking mendacity. (You know how the left hates a liar.)


Skewered~!

Go Girl!

[Bullish]

Liberals have more double standards than Carters has little pills.

It's to the point where it's useless to even try to debate them. Their minds are made up and they can't deal with facts, it's not suprising that emotion wins the day.

The lefts' hatred of Bush is what's driving the left, and it's fun to watch them twist in the wind. I hope their psychotic hatred exposes them and drives them out of power for good.

[Endeavor]

I care. I want to know where the d*mn things are. I don't doubt he had them. I want to know who has them now.

I'd also like to know if our intelligence capability is so poor that we don't have a clue as to where this stuff is/has gone. That concerns me.

The Left's position that Bush and Blair lied/manipulated intelligence is extremely lame because they'd then have known there were no such weapons and that they'd ultimately pay a tremendous political price when that became obvious.

Believing Bush and Blair lied about WMD is like believing Hillary! was shocked (shocked!, I tell you) to learn about the Bent One and "that woman, Ms. Lewinsky."

[lizma]

Last night I ate dinner with about 25 Clinton-voting "soccer moms".

Conversation wandered to the war and I brought up not finding WMD. Bottom line is that they could care less. They feel more secure with Bush at the helm and the attacks on our president by the demos make them more wary of the dem's motives.

The rats gave up the "soccer mom" (now "security moms")for the their fringe groups. Big mistake.

I like it.

[Copernicus]

Excellent writing. Excellent topic. For you to consider.

Best regards,

[jackbill]

The New York Times' leading hysteric, Frank Rich

I'd love to know how Ann was able to reach that conclusion. I'm still trying to decide between Rich, Paul Krugman, Maureen Dowd, Bob Herbert, Asshole, er I mean Adam Clymer, et al, as to who is the "leading hysteric" on the NYT. I'm ready to give a group award.

[Lancey Howard]

Oh, I think we know exactly where the weapons are.

Do you remember the Clinton trashing of the White House that took place right before the Scumbag Administration had to vacate so the fumigators could prepare the place for W to move in? Reports of the vandalism and theft were all over the place and the Bush people just waved their hands and said, "Forget about it. Let's move on." But the reports persisted, and they were a devastating blow to the reputation of Clinton and the Democrats.

So one day a Long Island congresscritter named Anthony Weiner was tabbed by the Democrats to be the point man in disputing the charges of vandalism. (This was safely after enough time had passed that the mess was presumably cleaned up. "You can't PROVE anything, Lieutenant Columbo.") Weiner popped up on every political talk show he could find, including the Sunday morning network shows, and shouted that these stories of trashing the White House were all total fabrications made up by the dirty tricks crowd at the Bush White House to try to soil the reputation of the Clinton Administartion. (LOFL!!!)

Weiner kept up his tirades until other Democrats (and some liberal media mice) joined him questioning the truthfulness of the reports. They hoped to turn the tables on Bush. "None of these reports are true!", they cried. The din grew so loud that finally Ari Fleischer, upon being questioned by a reporter at a daily news briefing, felt forced to comment. "Wanna see the videotape?", he said. The trap was sprung.

Anthony Weiner quietly dropped out of sight for a few months and no more questions were raised about the Clinton trashing of the White House. It was one great "gotcha" if there ever was one.

And now we have the WMDs that "don't exist". I have this funny feeling that when the din from the scumbags and their mouthpieces in the liberal newsrooms grows to a big enough crescendo, WMDs will be "discovered" all over Iraq.

[votelife]

iraq had not demonstrated they had disarmed and Saddam and company paid the price. Saddam chose war.

[Lancey Howard]

[LiteKeeper]

MEGA-DITTOES!!!!!!!!!!!!1

[GOPJ]

She's great. Who else can come up with this stuff?

Should we apologize and return the country to Saddam Hussein and his winsome sons? Should we have him on "Designer's Challenge" to put his palaces back in all their '80s Vegas splendor? Or maybe Uday and Qusay could spruce up each other's rape rooms on a very special episode of "Trading Spaces"? What is liberals' point?

No one cares.

[GOPJ]

She's great. Who else can come up with this stuff?

Should we apologize and return the country to Saddam Hussein and his winsome sons? Should we have him on "Designer's Challenge" to put his palaces back in all their '80s Vegas splendor? Or maybe Uday and Qusay could spruce up each other's rape rooms on a very special episode of "Trading Spaces"? What is liberals' point?

No one cares.

[cgk]

Ann Coulter ping