To: areafiftyone
I'm so torn about who I would like to get the nod........LOL.
2 posted on
06/04/2003 9:09:41 AM PDT by
Howlin
To: areafiftyone
LOL. I notice they polled registered, not likely voters. And I wonder if this is the same demographic that was recently polled and found unable to name most of the candidates. Yup, I'm impressed.
3 posted on
06/04/2003 9:10:33 AM PDT by
mewzilla
To: areafiftyone
So who is Holy Joe going to pick for his veep?
4 posted on
06/04/2003 9:10:45 AM PDT by
finnman69
(!)
To: areafiftyone
LOL--Sharpton in 4th place, ahead of Edwards and Dean. I love it! Why don't they just go all the way and nominate Farrakhan?
6 posted on
06/04/2003 9:10:46 AM PDT by
TheBigB
(Why don't women blink during foreplay? They don't have time.)
To: areafiftyone
So, only Liebermann and Kerry beat No Opinion. Funny.
7 posted on
06/04/2003 9:12:01 AM PDT by
brewcrew
(It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into. - Jonathan Swift)
To: areafiftyone
Bush has a chance of defeating Hillary next year if the Conservative wackos don't turn on him like they did to his father and not fall prey to another phoney "Perot".
8 posted on
06/04/2003 9:13:45 AM PDT by
Consort
To: areafiftyone
Nine Nattering Nincumpoops
10 posted on
06/04/2003 9:14:34 AM PDT by
MJY1288
("4" more in "04")
To: areafiftyone
Ultimate weeny!
15 posted on
06/04/2003 9:16:43 AM PDT by
jetson
To: areafiftyone
This is scary . . . very scary. Do you realize that 6% of the people want either Kucinich or Moseley Braun?
17 posted on
06/04/2003 9:22:51 AM PDT by
w_over_w
(I'll still luv ya if yer covered in mud . . . just like I luv muh pick up truk!)
To: areafiftyone
Go Reverend Al--GO!
18 posted on
06/04/2003 9:25:35 AM PDT by
NautiNurse
(If Lawton Chiles runs for the Senate seat in 2004, we will **really** have Jurassic Park in Florida)
To: areafiftyone
To: areafiftyone
Joe Lieberman is now the leading Democrat candidate, with 20% support. Note that "no one" draws 5% in this poll. "n opinion" draws 15%. That first answer, "no one," is rather curious. Does it mean that we should do without a President, starting in 2004? Or does it mean that 5% of the identified Democrats believe that none of these Democrat is qualified to be President? Of greater interest is the fact that the Democrats who don't like ANY Democrat (20%) are tied with those who prefer Lieberman, and ahead of all other listed Democrats. LOL.
Congressman Billybob
Latest column, now up on UPI and FR, and due to be in the Asheville Citizen-Times on Sunday, "Surviving in the Smokies."
20 posted on
06/04/2003 9:32:01 AM PDT by
Congressman Billybob
("Saddam has left the building. Heck, the building has left the building.")
To: areafiftyone
Al's making his move.....only one to increase % since April!!!
27 posted on
06/04/2003 9:51:41 AM PDT by
citizen
(Praise the Lord and pass the ammunition!)
To: areafiftyone
Historic, as Joe would say.
38 posted on
06/04/2003 11:02:20 AM PDT by
CaptRon
To: areafiftyone
If Sharpton starts polling higher than 10%, he might get close to winning this thing.
The current Democrat slate is not very inspiring.
To: areafiftyone
Here's a story
'bout a man named Sharpton
Who was trying to be President on his own
All the the rest were white as snow
Each with an Office
Except for Mosley Braun
49 posted on
06/04/2003 1:40:43 PM PDT by
kidd
To: areafiftyone
Anyone they nominate will be a sacrificial lamb on the altar of making sure Her Heinous doesn't have to run against an incumbent in 2008. Do the democrats actually think a majority of Americans will vote for somebody who could dub droopy cartoons?
50 posted on
06/04/2003 1:50:41 PM PDT by
katana
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
