Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 06/04/2003 2:42:22 AM PDT by kattracks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: kattracks
It's long overdue that these groups started getting hung by their own petards....it's they who are hateful.
2 posted on 06/04/2003 2:55:04 AM PDT by goodieD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
The new term for homosexuals is failed heterosexuals!

Pass it on.

4 posted on 06/04/2003 3:23:33 AM PDT by Revolutionary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
According to press reports, fellow protestor and former altar boy Carl Sciortino said: "I'm not turning my back on my church or my God, I'm turning my back on the bishops who are promoting this discrimination.

"As a Catholic, I find it disgusting that I have to protest my own church to have equal rights under state law," Sciortino told the Boston Globe Monday.

I find this segment particularly telling. A former altar boy in Boston is now a 'homosexual' activist.

Why is he a 'homosexual'? Because he was very likely molested by 'homosexual' priests right there in Boston. And they say it's not contagious.

Rather than get healed and restored he now wants the entire world to accept his sexual deviancy.

Remember the golden rules of 'homosexuality':

1.)'Homosexuals' don't reproduce, they recruit

2.) To a healthy person (heterosexual), sex is what they do
To a mentally ill person ('homosexual'), sex is what they are.

3.) Any exposure of children to homosexual behavior is child abuse

6 posted on 06/04/2003 6:21:15 AM PDT by John O (God Save America (Please))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; coondawg
"A number of them embraced one another, held hands, and at least two male homosexuals kissed each other," Doyle said. "A number of parishioners had to get up and actually move because either their view of the sanctuary was being blocked or because they felt somehow threatened or menaced by these protestors, who then - after a short time - walked out.

This is the way to "win friends and influence people"?

8 posted on 06/04/2003 6:57:04 AM PDT by TaxRelief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; scripter; ArGee; FourtySeven

"One of these psychopaths actually shouted at her for the children to cover up their genitals because Catholic priests were present...something you would expect more from Nazi Germany or Soviet Russia than in a free society," Doyle said.

New York Gay Legislator Advocatesdiscrimination Against Catholic Priests Thomas Duane, a gay state senator from New York, declared yesterday that all Catholic priests should be barred from leading a prayer in the legislature.

"The Nazi Master Plan: The Persecution Of The Christian Churches"

The Poisoned Stream "Gay" Influence in Human History. Volume One. Germany 1890-1945. View as HTML

The Gestapo readily had recourse to the charge of homosexuality if it was unable to find any pretext for proceeding against Catholic priests or irksome critics" (Kogon:44).

Igra's primary value to us today is that he was an eyewitness to the changes that occurred in Germany; an eyewitness with a uniquely prophetic sense of the danger of "gay" influence in society. I consider it a great privilege to be able to review his work for the modern reader.
Igra's Thesis: Homosexuality Was at the Root of Nazi Evil

A Psychological Profile of Adolf Hitler Walter C. Langer, Office of Strategic Services,Washington, D.C.

"I am one of the hardest men Germany has had for decades, perhaps for centuries, equipped [Page 7] with the greatest authority of any German leader... but above all, I believe in my success. I believe in it unconditionally." (M.N.O. 871)

The great difficulty is that this form of identification early in life carries the individual in the direction of passive homosexuality. Hitler has for years been suspected of being a homosexual, although there is no reliable evidence that he has actually engaged in a relationship of this kind. Rauschning reports that he has met two boys who claimed that they were Hitler's homosexual partners, but their testimony can scarcely be taken at its face value. More condemning would be the remarks dropped by Foerster, the Danzig Gauleiter, in conversations with Rauschning. Even here, however, the remarks deal only with Hitler's impotence as far as heterosexual relations go without actually implying that he indulges in homosexuality. It is probably true that Hitler calls Foerster "Bubi", which is a common nickname employed by homosexuals in addressing their partners. This alone, however, is not adequate proof that he has actually indulged in homosexual practices with Foerster, who is known to be a homosexual.

The belief that Hitler is homosexual has probably developed (a) from the fact that he does show so many feminine characteristics, and (b) from the fact that there were so many homosexuals in the Party during the early days and many continue to occupy important positions. It does seem that Hitler feels much more at ease with homosexuals than with normal persons, but this may be due to the fact that they are all fundamentally social outcasts and consequently have a community of interests which tends to make them think and feel more or less alike. In this connection it is interesting to note that homosexuals, too, frequently regard themselves as a special form of creation or as chosen ones whose destiny it is to initiate a new order.

The fact that underneath they feel themselves to be different and ostracized from normal social contacts usually makes them easy converts to a new social philosophy which does not discriminate against them. Being among civilization's discontents, they are always willing to take a chance of something new which holds any promise of improving their lot, even though their chances of success may be small and the risk great. Having little to lose to begin with, they can afford to take chances which others would refrain from taking. The early Nazi party certainly contained many members who could be regarded in this light. Even today Hitler derives pleasure from looking at men's bodies and associating with homosexuals. Strasser tells us that his personal body guard is almost always 100% homosexuals. [Page 196]

He also derives considerable pleasure from being with his Hitler Youth and his attitude towards them frequently tends to be more that of a woman than that of a man.

There is a possibility that Hitler has participated in a homosexual relationship at some time in his life. The evidence is such that we can only say there is a strong tendency in this direction which, in addition to the manifestations already enumerated, often finds expression in imagery concerning being attacked from behind or being stabbed in the back. His nightmares, which frequently deal with being attacked by a man and being suffocated, also suggest strong homosexual tendencies and a fear of them. From these indications, however, we would conclude that for the most part these tendencies have been repressed, which would speak against the probability of their being expressed in overt form. On the other hand, persons suffering from his perversion sometimes do indulge in homosexual practices in the hope that they might find sexual gratification. Even this perversion would be more acceptable to them than the one with which they are afflicted.

On the whole, one could say of many of the German troops what Rauschning said of Hitler: [Page 242] "...there lies behind Hitler's emphasis on brutality and ruthlessness the desolation of a forced and artificual inhumanity, not the amorality of the genuine brute, which has after all something of the power of a natural force."

9 posted on 06/04/2003 7:11:22 AM PDT by Remedy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Remedy; *Homosexual Agenda; GrandMoM; backhoe; pram; Yehuda; Clint N. Suhks; saradippity; ...
Sheesh, we've had a lot of activity on this issue lately or maybe it's just getting reported more often.
11 posted on 06/04/2003 8:13:44 AM PDT by scripter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks; BibChr; logos; The Big Econ; frogsong; Caleb1411; MHGinTN
The "logical" extension of hate-crime legislation as explored by Linda Bowles in her column entitled Learning to hate hate, the last four paragraphs of which follow:

. . .It is my view that no one should be left behind. In addition to variously oriented sexual deviants, there are many others among us who might qualify for hate crime coverage by virtue of substantial public scorn and hostility.

How may we exclude such publicly despised contenders as cigar aficionados, tobacco executives, members of the militia, drunks, conservative columnists, trial lawyers, IRS agents, used-car salesmen, politicians and skinheads? Are they not equally worthy in the eyes of the law?

And in the spirit of our president's [Clinton's] call to arms against crimes of hate, surely, anyone who assaults, maligns or harasses a proud and practicing Southern Baptist should get triple punishment, including enforced attendance at a brain-scrubbing sensitivity seminar designed by Jerry Falwell.

Alas, the new hate crime proposal does not include white heterosexual males as a protected category. If one were so inclined, one might think that excluding this particular group of Americans reflects a hate so deep as to suggest there is nothing either special or hateful about dragging one of them behind a truck.

12 posted on 06/04/2003 8:25:58 AM PDT by rhema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I'd like to see the queeries try this in a mosque.
13 posted on 06/04/2003 8:32:03 AM PDT by Alouette (Why is it called "International Law" if only Israel and the United States are expected to keep it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
According to press reports, fellow protestor and former altar boy Carl Sciortino said: "I'm not turning my back on my church or my God, I'm turning my back on the bishops who are promoting this discrimination.

"As a Catholic, I find it disgusting that I have to protest my own church to have equal rights under state law," Sciortino told the Boston Globe Monday.

If that's the way you feel about it, you ought to turn your back on them, and walk out the door, never to return. No one is keeping you in that bad old church with those nasty bishops who don't rip up certain passages of the Scriptures that don't suit them.

This is a free country. We have freedom of religion and freedom of movement.

MOVE.

14 posted on 06/04/2003 8:56:27 AM PDT by L.N. Smithee (Just because I don't think like you doesn't mean I don't think for myself)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
BUMP
15 posted on 06/04/2003 10:58:49 AM PDT by GrandMoM ("Vengeance is Mine , I will repay," says the Lord.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Polycarp
You seen this?
17 posted on 06/04/2003 11:11:09 AM PDT by B Knotts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I would hate to see this considered a hate crime. It is free speech, however much we may disagree with it. That said, the church itself should take steps to stop it on the church's private property. The article said that they soon left, but if they had not, they could be ordered to leave, and if they did not, then they could and should be charged with criminal trespass. They should also be forbidden to come on any diocese property again. Then, if they again try this they can be immediately arrested for trespass. I just believe that we should get away from most of these hate crimes. Most are real crimes and should be so prosecuted. Then we don't have to worry about the free speech issues.
18 posted on 06/04/2003 11:33:57 AM PDT by RussRoberts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"One of these psychopaths..."

And there you have it. Remember, SSAD was stricken from the DSM in the 1970s--and not because of science.
23 posted on 06/04/2003 9:21:58 PM PDT by Antoninus (In hoc signo, vinces †)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
Spray the fairies with 'pixie dust' ... mace for the peaceniks among us. Or better yet, spray the faggots with Old Spice in profuse amounts, then toss them out the door on their keesters.
24 posted on 06/04/2003 9:29:02 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
"As a Catholic, I find it disgusting that I have to protest my own church to have equal rights under state law," Sciortino told the Boston Globe Monday.

Since when has it been a right to be married to absolutely anyone you want to marry? There are lots of laws restricting who you can marry. Why do gays always think they have to be special and allowed to do any perverted thing they want in order to have their "civil rights" mintained?

Shalom.

28 posted on 06/06/2003 11:00:20 AM PDT by ArGee (I did not come through fire and death to bandy crooked words with a serving-man... - Gandalf)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: kattracks
I agree that they should be charged with something, but I doubt it will be called a hate crime.

Homosexual activists are known for these sorts of tactics, for example slashing tires outside of churches that have anything to do with ex-gay ministries etc.

Funny how gays who demand everybody be tolerant of their beliefs and values can be so totally intolerant of those who's beliefs they don't approve of. Hypocrites.

Perhaps they haven't had enough experience with real intolerance.

38 posted on 06/07/2003 5:56:30 PM PDT by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson