Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

On Camera but Unaware, Bush Displays His Fervor
New York Times ^ | 06-03-03

Posted on 06/03/2003 8:22:05 PM PDT by Brian S

By ELISABETH BUMILLER

SHARM EL SHEIK, Egypt, June 3 — It was not surprising that President Bush would get tough with the Israelis and Palestinians and demand that both get their houses in order. What was surprising, because of an extraordinary mistake by Egyptian television, was that Mr. Bush would be caught unawares on camera today speaking about the Middle East with more bluntness, emotion and religious fervor than had been heard before.

Anyone who has regularly watched Mr. Bush in speeches and news conferences could tell in an instant that he had no idea that his remarks to five moderate Arab leaders were being broadcast for public consumption. He was colloquial, and referred to "Almighty God."

By late afternoon, Mr. Bush's aides acknowledged that the president had not known the cameras were rolling as he spoke. Subsequently, White House transcribers scrambled to record his comments from network tapes.

Speaking the direct language of a politician willing to take a dangerous gamble — as long as the others were, too — Mr. Bush made his comments just after he had spent 90 minutes in an unscheduled meeting with the five Arab leaders, with only interpreters present.

"No matter how difficult it is, you have my commitment that I will expend the energy and effort necessary to move the process forward," Mr. Bush told the leaders as they gathered for a second meeting, this one with multiple aides.

At one point the president turned to look directly at the new Palestinian prime minister, Mahmoud Abbas, a man in whom he had invested political capital and was meeting for the first time. "You, sir, have got a responsibility, and you've assumed it," the president said. "I want to work with you, as do the other leaders here. We must not allow a few people, a few killers, a few terrorists, to destroy the dreams and the hopes of the many."

With that, Mr. Bush turned his attention to Israel, particularly its prime minister, Ariel Sharon, who was not at the table, but will be on Wednesday in Jordan.

"Israel has got responsibilities," Mr. Bush said. "Israel must deal with the settlements. Israel must make sure there's a continuous territory that Palestinians call home." (The White House, which late in the day produced a transcript of Mr. Bush's remarks, put the word "contiguous" in parentheses after "continuous," to indicate that "contiguous" was what Mr. Bush had meant.)

For Mr. Bush, the stop in this jewel of a manufactured oasis on the edge of Bedouin lands was his first big step into the Middle East conflict. Few knew precisely what had occurred between Mr. Bush and the five Arab leaders, because they did not even allow in note-takers. Rarely has Mr. Bush gone so solo. Afterward, the five leaders pledged they would fight the "culture of extremism and violence" that has undercut peace, and act to control the flow of money to terrorist groups.

Mr. Bush sat at a round table with his host, President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt. Joining them were Mr. Abbas, Crown Prince Abdullah of Saudi Arabia, King Abdullah II of Jordan and King Hamad of Bahrain.

Mr. Bush won good reviews on his performance from Arab leaders, who expressed relief and gratitude that he had at last come to their region. His goal today was to enlist support of the Arab leaders behind Mr. Abbas, also known as Abu Mazen, whom he wants to promote as the leader of the Palestinians over the administration's nemesis, Yasir Arafat. In one moment caught by an Egyptian TV camera, Mr. Bush and Mr. Abbas could be seen smiling and talking to each other off to the side of the other leaders and officials.

"By the time the lunch was over, they looked like they were old pals from a long time ago," said a high-ranking Saudi official. "The ability of the president to move from different personalities to different types of people — if it was never tested before, it was certainly tested today." The president, the Saudi official said, had shown his "seriousness" about the process.

So far, Mr. Bush has shown no signs of fatigue or impatience on this seven-day, six-nation journey, as he did on a trip to Europe a year ago. One difference is that this time Mr. Bush is the victor of the war in Iraq, more in control, with far more power to wield. He also appears to be having a good time: This afternoon he grinned as he drove Mr. Mubarak by golf cart from the Four Seasons Hotel to an outdoor news conference on a bluff overlooking the sea, where the president was then seen to kiss King Hamad on both cheeks.

Mr. Bush was also evidently comfortable enough to talk to the Arabs about his own religion. "I believe that, as I told the Crown Prince, the Almighty God has endowed each individual on the face of the earth with — that expects each person to be treated with dignity," Mr. Bush said in the remarks that he did not know were being broadcast. "This is a universal call. It's the call of all religions, that each person must be free and treated with respect."

It is with that call, Mr. Bush concluded, "that I feel passionate about the need to move forward."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Front Page News
KEYWORDS: bushandgod; egypt; jordansummit
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last
To: Brian S
"At one point the president turned to look directly at the new Palestinian prime minister, Mahmoud Abbas, a man in whom he had invested political capital and was meeting for the first time. "You, sir, have got a responsibility, and you've assumed it,"

This my fellow freepers, is called leadership.
21 posted on 06/03/2003 8:51:51 PM PDT by Pylot
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: supercat
What have Bush and the media learned from the incident where he called a Clymer a clymer?

I remember that "accident" big time!

22 posted on 06/03/2003 8:53:19 PM PDT by nana4bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Such earth shattering things revealed by this "accident"

Bush telling the Palestinians that they have "Responsibilities" -- Oh lord how can he talk to them like that!! Expecting them to uphold their end of the bargain. How dare he!

And he expects Isreal to do the same thing! I am Shocked! Shocked I say, to find out that diplomacy is taking place here!

And to top it all off, the horror of an acknowledgement that the "Almighty God" controls everyone's destiny! OMG whatever shall we do!

/Sarcasm

I bet Terry McAwful and the Dimbulbs are peeing their pants over this "accidental broadcast" showing a A Confident Prepared President doing his job!

23 posted on 06/03/2003 8:58:13 PM PDT by commish (Freedom Tastes Sweetest to Those Who Have Fought to Preserve It)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pylot
Indeed. The NYTimes seems to be printing these things as if the President would be embarrassed that it was known he said them. This sounds like someone who is serious both on the record and off. I see nothing to be embarrassed about--he's telling them the way it is. He is telling them what he expects to happen.
24 posted on 06/03/2003 8:59:48 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Flora McDonald
I think the Mr. Bush thing is a long-time pattern of the NY Times. They list your full name once and further references are always Mr., even for murderers. What especially annoys me is when the talking heads on the TV news call him "Bush" when they were slobbering all over "President Clinton."
25 posted on 06/03/2003 9:01:10 PM PDT by ntnychik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
I dont see anything here that even looks remotely contraversial.
26 posted on 06/03/2003 9:01:50 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Pylot
BINGO! and the sycophantic 'lie'beral media is having fits, especially since their phones and fax machines must be jammed with directives from McAwful & co.
27 posted on 06/03/2003 9:02:09 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote Life Support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: All
Did the NYT always refer to x42 (I mean Former President) as "Mr." Clinton during his term? I don't read the NYT, so I don't know.

28 posted on 06/03/2003 9:05:28 PM PDT by ladyesk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
Accident, my butt. He was speaking from the heart with other world leaders, openly acknowledging the hand of the Almighty God in the events that steer our collective destinies. GOOD for him, and is there a soul on this forum who could picture a Bill Clinton being able to say that with a straight face (ok....either you OR Bill Clinton?)? I think not.

Religion drives the Middle East. Anyone who doesn't see that is an idiot. Bush knows it, and he is a deeply religious man. He spoke to them on a heart-to-heart level, and I hope the whole Mideast world sees it.

29 posted on 06/03/2003 9:05:52 PM PDT by RightOnline
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
well, that's true--we should keep in mind it is entirely possible, since this is a NY Times article, that this is completely made up.
30 posted on 06/03/2003 9:06:42 PM PDT by Republican Wildcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
kiss King Hamad on both cheeks.

Unfortunatly weve been doing this for some time.
31 posted on 06/03/2003 9:12:46 PM PDT by Husker24
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thegreatbeast
>>And then there is Mr. Bush's intemeperance, "...that Mr. Bush would be caught unawares on camera today speaking about the Middle East with more bluntness, emotion and religious fervor than had been heard before." The religious fervor, see? That is a bad thing in the NYT's eyes.<<

Yes, I caught that, too. Yet what President Bush actually said would never be described in those terms (blunt, emotional, religious fervor) by a sane person.

Also, if the author's intent was to portray President Bush in a bad light, he failed. Bush came out looking like a great leader, who is just as earnest about achieving his goals off-camera as on.

The New York Times is suicidally transparent in it's bias. Most people I know do not consider it a reliable source of news, and they haven't for years now.


regards,
risa
32 posted on 06/03/2003 9:15:03 PM PDT by Risa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: commish
And to top it all off, the horror of an acknowledgement that the "Almighty God" controls everyone's destiny! OMG whatever shall we do!

As G-d has not seen fit to sit down with the NY Slimes for an interview He obviously does not exist. That's why the Slimes objects to anyone's 'religious fevour'. They worship themselves.

33 posted on 06/03/2003 9:18:05 PM PDT by pbear8 ( sed libera nos a malo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Brian S; rintense; MJY1288; ohioWfan; Miss Marple; Howlin; Brad's Gramma; Molly Pitcher; ...
The full text of these "controversial" remarks ......

Remarks by the President at Multilateral Meeting with Arab Leaders

34 posted on 06/03/2003 9:19:58 PM PDT by kayak (Do not bet against the success of freedom. - GWB 5/9/03)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
I agree with you. This is an example of an American President says what he means and tells the truth in public. Then, in a private meeting when the cameras are not supposed to be rolling, he says what he means and tells the truth again, but in stronger terms.

Boy, howdy, that's a situation the New York Times doesn't begin to understand, and therefore doesn't know how to report. It lacks an insert point for its editorial stiletto. It doesn't know how to corrupt this story.

On the other hand, witness the Times's main story on the capture of Eric Rudolph. It led with a quote from a local woman who said she "didn't see that Rudolph had done anything bad." The Times wanted to paint the average citizens of Western Carolina as morons and bigots. It is not yet known whether the Times reporter made up the quote, made up the woman, or ever bothered to go to Murphy, NC. Even if they did have a reporter on the ground, the assignment was, "Find the stupidest person you can, and use the dumbest possible quote."

Congressman Billybob

Latest column, now up on UPI and FR, and due to be in the Asheville Citizen-Times on Sunday, "Surviving in the Smokies."

35 posted on 06/03/2003 9:23:18 PM PDT by Congressman Billybob ("Saddam has left the building. Heck, the building has left the building.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: MHGinTN
>>BINGO! and the sycophantic 'lie'beral media is having fits, especially since their phones and fax machines must be jammed with directives from McAwful & co.<<

Exactly. And not only the liberal media, but so many people of different political persuasion want our President to fail, even if it means the destruction of our country and its people. I imagine they seeth with envy right now to see Bush's display of courage and determination in the Middle East, favorable attributes which few past Presidents were able to muster.(such as Clinton.)
36 posted on 06/03/2003 9:27:03 PM PDT by Risa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: ntnychik
Speaking of slobbering, I can remember when Peter Jennings would have FORMER (Lord, I wish he would go away) President Clinton's head floating in a montage on the screen behind him as he started the evening news.

That's one memory I hope will fade soon.

I haven't been able to watch Jennings since he fell apart on national television on Sept. 11, 2001.
37 posted on 06/03/2003 9:31:11 PM PDT by Flora McDonald (BRING AMERICA BACK TO LIFE)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Brian S
not an accident at all, and because of his deep religious convictions they will take GWB very seriously. i hope thats a good thing. Will they take this chance to jump up 1300+ years and join modern civilization or will their overwhelming hatred of jews and covetous yearning for the "promised land" drive them to bring about armageddon?
38 posted on 06/03/2003 9:33:03 PM PDT by gdc61 (poor fishies)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brian S

Mr. Bush was also evidently comfortable enough to talk to the Arabs about his own religion.

I find it hilarious how this insinuates that one should be embarassed to refer to one's religious beliefs when having a serious discussion with others. Obviously, the writer doesn't understand this at all.

Bush just keeps astounding me with what an impressive President he is. If he pulls this off, he becomes one of the greatest leaders of all time.

39 posted on 06/03/2003 9:33:22 PM PDT by JmyBryan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Risa
The political equivalent of the carrier landing.

Following the shut out of France Germany in particular and the EU in general.

Dashole was deeply saddened and Waxman called for an enquiry.....dems called for the White House not to use the clips in the 04 race.

40 posted on 06/03/2003 9:33:58 PM PDT by spokeshave (visit www.lanchester.com for best kept secrets of marketing strategy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-68 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson