Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NY Times Editorial Troubles Continue --- As Times Staff Goes Bye
Media Life ^ | June 3, 2003 | Jeff Bercovici

Posted on 06/03/2003 12:06:37 PM PDT by tvn

When it Raines,it pours (buckets)-- Times scandal gaining more attention by the day

Does anyone remember the name Jayson Blair?

How about Howell Raines?

Both in their way have disgraced The New York Times, but at this point at least one seems to have been forgotten. That's Jayson Blair, the plagiarist, who's now out peddling a book idea.

The other, Raines, seems to grow in national importance by the day, but not in the importance the Times is used to or particularly relishes.

The Blair plagiarism scandal may not yet have made Raines into a household name in, say, the manner of Monica Lewinsky. But it has made Raines and The Times Topic A in a lot of forums it would prefer not to be in, such as the right-leaning cable talk shows, where Times-bashing is quickly assuming role once served by Clinton-bashing.

No wonder. The harder Raines works to bring the Times newsroom back under control, the more it appears to move beyond his control.

In the episode's latest development, Arthur Sulzberger Jr., the Times' publisher, is headed down to Washington today in what looks like a mission to avert a potential mutiny. Even before the Times dispatched Blair to the capital to cover last fall's sniper spree, the D.C. bureau was said to be unhappy over the way Raines had undercut its traditional independence from New York.

Back at headquarters, another revolt is afoot. A number of Times staffers who have been called in for questioning by the so-called Siegal committee have reportedly defied the summons.

The 23-person committee, headed by assistant managing editor Al Siegal, is charged with investigating the chain of events in the Blair fiasco and making recommendations for reform. It is expected to issue a full report on its findings sometime next month.

The holdouts apparently agree with Nancy Sharkey, the training and development editor who quit the panel last week, reportedly because she felt its mission had taken on the air of a witch hunt.

In another possible sign of dissent, a second committee, headed by assistant managing editors Craig Whitney and Andrew Rosenthal, has taken it upon itself to gin up suggestions for improving in-house communications.

Meanwhile, the Times continues to take a licking in the press. Some of the harshest criticism came from New York magazine media columnist Michael Wolff, who attacked Raines' decision to suspend national correspondent Rick Bragg after learning that Bragg had relied heavily on the reporting of an unpaid, uncredited freelancer for one of his feature stories.

"Not only was what [Bragg] did not wrong, it's ridiculous he got reprimanded for it. It's a bureaucratic response," Wolff told the Hartford Courant. "There is a kind of literalism here that is the refuge of the non-brilliant."

Raines was also widely criticized for failing to speak out earlier after Bragg defended his practices by saying they were common at the Times. The silence from the top of the masthead left Times reporters no choice but to defend their honor by blasting Bragg publicly, prompting his quick resignation.

The New York Post weighed in on events this weekend by getting a professional oddsmaker to estimate the probabilities of various Times personnel resigning or being fired. His odds on Raines getting pushed out were 1:5.

Some papers have chosen to express their revised view of the Times with actions rather than words. The Lufkin (Texas) Daily News dropped New York Times editorialist Maureen Dowd's column from its editorial page on Friday in response to a column in which she misrepresented the meaning of a remark made by President Bush.

"The New York Times' considerable credibility problem is now our problem, as well," wrote editor Marc Masferrer in explaining the decision.

Earlier, Denver's Rocky Mountain News took a newly skeptical stance toward Times reporting, enacting a rule that reports from the Times based on quotes from anonymous sources must be cleared with top editors before being reprinted.

Also last week, the Richmond Times-Dispatch responded in print to readers who had demanded that the paper stop using The New York Times' news service, accusing it of liberal bias. The paper said it will continue to feature Times reporting based on the Times’ record of credibility.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: howellraines; jaysonblair; nyt; nytimes; ricbragg
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last
The search continues for new NY Times slogan-

The Top 10:

1) All the News That We See Fit to Print

2) Some News, Some Fiction, You Figure It Out

3) All The News We Can Make Up or Steal

4) We Can Fool All of the People Some of the Time- That’s Enough for Us

5) What’s The Big Deal, It’s Not Like We Committed A Crime

6) You Want To Be Sure, Check With the Christian Science Monitor or Washington Post

7) "If They're So Smart, Why Didn't The Catch Me?" Jayson Blair, May 2003

8) Even the Stuff We Make Up Is Better Than Any Other Paper

9) Pretending To Send More Reporters To Cover More Stories Than Any Other Newspaper in the World

10) Countering the Country’s Conservative Course

The full list of 140 entries proposed so far:

1) ALL THE NEWS THAT'S FIT TO PRINT--NOT

2) LOTS OF NEWS THAT'S NOT FIT TO PRINT

3) ALL THE NEWS WE PRINT ISN'T FIT

4) All Our Views That's News to Print

5) All the News That We See Fit to Print

6) All the News As We See It

7) All the News, Fact or Better, Fiction

8) All the News, Well At Least Almost

9) All the News That We Can Dream Up

10) All The News We Can Crib From Others

11) Some News, Some Fiction, You Figure It Out

12) All The News We Can Make Up or Steal

13) All the News That's Fit to Print and Is Cleared by Our Lawyers

14) Lots of News We've Stolen From Other Papers

15) All the News Fit for a Plagiarist

16) All News Only a Plagiarist Can Love

17) All The News, Just Don't Check the Sources

18) All the News, Trust Us--Honest

19) Changing Fiction To Fact

20) All News, No Credibility

21) All the Lies Fit to Print.

22) Face it, We Just Like to Print!

23) Aside from the pervasive Marxist bias, multitudinous errors and mis-information, and Anti-capitalist/anti-American posturing, we ain’t that bad!"

24) "All The News That Fits Our Views."

25) All The News That’s Fit to Print, Except For the Stuff We Make Up

26) All the News And Then the Part We Make Up

27) Some Facts, the Rest Fiction

28) Reporting Fiction Stranger than Fact

29) Reporting Facts And Stranger Fiction

30) When It's Raines, It Bores

31) All the News Cribbed to Fit

32) Just the Facts and Some Fiction Thrown In

33) Some News, Some Fiction, You Figure It Out

34) We Can Fool All of the People Some of the Time- That’s Enough for Us

35) The Blair Filch Project

36) Nothing But the Truth (Except for the Part We Make Up)

37) Leading Nominee for Pulitzer Prize for Fiction

38) A Lie Told Often Enough Becomes Fact in the Times

39) Truth is Truth, Except in the New York Times

40) Transforming Lies into Truth

41) Weaving A Tangled Web to Deceive

42) When the Going Gets Tough, The Times Makes It Up

43) Give Us A Dollar, And We’ll Give You The World-- As We See It

44) The New York Times- We Try Harder, Then We Make It Up.

45) The New York Times, The Ultimate Lying Machine

46) When the News Absolutely, Positively Has to be Reported, We Make It Up.

47) We Answer to the Highest Authority- Ourselves

48) New York Times- Do They or Don’t They?

49) Hey, We All Make Mistakes

50) We Admit--When You’re Wrong, You’re Wrong

51) We Really Messed Up

52) We’re Really, Really Sorry—Honest

53) We Rarely Make Mistakes, But When We Do, They Tend To Be Lulus

54) What’s The Big Deal- We Usually Get It Right

55) Remember, The Washington Post Makes Mistakes Too

56) If You Don’t Believe Us- You Can Check The Facts on Google

57) We’ll Get It Right Yet

58) The Internet’s Replacing the Printed Press Anyway

59) What’s The Big Deal, It’s Not Like We Committed A Crime

60) What's the Big Deal- News Stories Are Like Subways—There’s A New One Arriving Every Few Minutes

61) We’ve Replaced the 5 W’s (Who, What, When, Where, Why) With the 5P’s (Pontificate, Proselytize, Persuade, Prevaricate, Persecute) and the 5 D’s ( Defraud, Distort, Deceive, Denounce, Dissemble)

62) When In Doubt, We Make It Up

63) Newspaper of Broken Record

64) All the News—And Then the Raines Came

65) Ethics—Who Needs “Em

66) We Have Nothing To Fear But -- Truth Itself

67) When the News Breaks, We “Fix” It

68) New York, New York, It’s A Wonderful Town—Just Don’t Rely on the Times

69) The New York Times would like to retract the following statement: "All The News That's Fit To Print" We have determined that this has been a daily lie for some time now, and we are diligently investigating how we can pin it all on Jason Blair. We appreciate your forbearance in this matter.

70) All the News That's Fit to Print, More or Less

71) "We decide, we report"

72) Maybe It’s True, Maybe it isn’t

73) Gray Lady down—and on her way out

74) We Always Knew What Was Fit To Print—Now We’re Really Not Sure

75) Neither Raines, Nor Sleet, Nor Dead Of Night Will Keep Us From Delivering Our Version of News

76) Raines’ Flops Keep Befalling On Our Headlines

77) Howell Raines’ Disdain Befalls Mainly Those in the Main

78) New York, New York- If We Can Make It Up There, We Can Make It Up Any Where

79) You Want To Be Sure, Check With the Christian Science Monitor

80) We Have To Find Some Way To Keep Our Circulation Up

81) All the news that fits....half is lies, the other half we made up.

82) All the new that's fit to print....(>>> anagram >>>).... That's it, then all profits went

83) All the news that's printed to fit our agenda

84) New York Times - The Novel .

85) All the News That’s Fit to Print- We triple guarantee it. There are no communists at the Times

86) We distort, you decide!

87) “Stuff We Heard From A Guy Who Says His Friend Heard About It"

88) Remember, Jayson Blair Got His Job Through the New York Times

89) The New York Times: Where Pinch Is Out To Lunch

90) Pinch- First Against the War, First Against the Peace, First in not axing lax newsmen

91) New York Times: Where Truth Takes A Holiday

92) New York Times: Where Affimative Action Begins and Proper Editing Ends

93) "If They're So Smart, Why Didn't The Catch Me?" Jayson Blair, May 2003

94) We Check It Twice, But Often Fail To Find Who's Naughty or Nice

95) Any More Screwups Like Blair And We Promise We'll Carry Cartoons

96) Pulp Fiction

97) We are lying (this time we are telling the truth)

98) Facts...Schmacts

99) A lot of words we figure we can print"

100) LIAR, LIAR, PRINT'S ON FIRE.

101) Call Us With A Tip, We’ll Make Up the Rest

102) All the news that's fixed to print.

103) All The News That Fits, We Print.

104) Covering the World From 44th Street and Broadway

105) Rewriting News From Across The Globe

106) Even the Stuff We Make Up Is Better Than Any Other Paper

107) We Never Let the Truth Stand Between the Times And a Good Story

108) Hey, At Least We Got The Truman-Dewey Election Right

109) We Know What Our Readers Want—So We Just Make It Up

110) We’re the World’s Largest Newspaper- We Can’t Make Everything Up

111) Research Shows Our Readers Usually Rate Our Made Up Articles Higher that The Real Stories Any Way

112) That's Newsertainment!

113) Pinch's Fiction

114) Darkest Ink In the Business

115) You Sayin' We're Liars?

116) We Prefer To Think Of It As "Reality Journalism"

117) More Than Equal Opportunity Employer

118) Ignore The Phony Reporting - Check out Those Hooters In Our Macy's Underwear Ads!

119) Thriftiest Traveling Reporters Anywhere

120) Printed On Real Paper Made From Actual Trees- Only Our News Is Recycled

121) Now 50% More Absorbent

122) Soy-Based Inks - Won't Spoil Flavor Of Your Fish!

123) So What If We Lie A Lot - We're From New York

124) Fact-checking? Why bother!

125) Ample Free Parking In Employee Garage

126) Pretending To Send More Reporters To Cover More Stories Than Any Other Newspaper in the World

127) Countering the Country’s Conservative Course

128) We Know What’s Right—Trust Us!

129) When Better Stories Are Reported, the Times Will Make Them Up

130) Us Lie? Never!

131) NY Times : Merging Facts and Opinion

132) Where Reporters Interpret the News

133) Once The Newspaper of Record

134) Please Believe Us

135) Reporting What We Think You Should Know

136) The New York Times Knows Best

137) Home of the Anonymous Source

138) In New York, Everyone Reads the Times—They Just Can’t Trust It

139) Where Today’s Scoops Become Tomorrow’s Retractions

140) We Get It Right, Or At Least Close

Also--- Motto on Jayson Blair's Desk- The Lies Start Here

Motto on Rick Bragg’s Desk: I Never Met A Stringer I Didn’t Like

Motto on Howell Raines' Desk: (1) Don't Bother Me With The Truth, I Have A Paper To Run! (2) That’s Close Enough

Motto on Pinch Sulzberger's Desk: (1) The Buck Passes By Here (2) I Got My Job By Inheriting The New York Times

1 posted on 06/03/2003 12:06:38 PM PDT by tvn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: tvn
Listing Gray Lady. Excuse me while I get a hanky...
2 posted on 06/03/2003 12:07:53 PM PDT by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tvn
Is Pinch taking his little stuffed moose with him?
3 posted on 06/03/2003 12:12:05 PM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All
-The Old Grey Info-Slut... the NYT/Jayson Blair Affair--
4 posted on 06/03/2003 12:15:50 PM PDT by backhoe (Diversity = Everyone looks different, yet thinks alike...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: goldstategop; Sonny M; Grampa Dave
"Listing Gray Lady. Excuse me while I get a hanky..."

They have only themselves to blame. They made the Blair story front page Sunday. They could have buried it on page 15 Wednesday and said "sorry, won't happen again" - end of story. Whatever political or emotional reasons compelled them to sensationalize the story, the reasons are their own doing.

5 posted on 06/03/2003 12:18:18 PM PDT by Shermy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: tvn
If they give Maureen Dowd a pass, after the obvious misrepresentation of the Bush quote, they have not changed at all and still do not understand the basic problem.
6 posted on 06/03/2003 12:21:31 PM PDT by Blue Screen of Death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave; Miss Marple; Howlin; martin_fierro; Timesink; mrustow
Some papers have chosen to express their revised view of the Times with actions rather than words. The Lufkin (Texas) Daily News dropped New York Times editorialist Maureen Dowd's column from its editorial page on Friday in response to a column in which she misrepresented the meaning of a remark made by President Bush.

"The New York Times' considerable credibility problem is now our problem, as well," wrote editor Marc Masferrer in explaining the decision.

Earlier, Denver's Rocky Mountain News took a newly skeptical stance toward Times reporting, enacting a rule that reports from the Times based on quotes from anonymous sources must be cleared with top editors before being reprinted.

Also last week, the Richmond Times-Dispatch responded in print to readers who had demanded that the paper stop using The New York Times' news service, accusing it of liberal bias. The paper said it will continue to feature Times reporting based on the Times’ record of credibility.

And so readers, that about wraps the good news of the Times in a State of Collapse for today.

7 posted on 06/03/2003 12:44:29 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
I would say that the Richmond Times-Dispatch has a real truth problem with this remark: The Richmond Times-Dispatch responded in print to readers who had demanded that the paper stop using The New York Times' news service, accusing it of liberal bias. The paper said it will continue to feature Times reporting based on the Times’ record of credibility.
8 posted on 06/03/2003 12:50:15 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Shermy
They tried to make it look like bad judgement on management's part due to Political Correctness, Diversity and Affirmative action.

The last thing they wanted out in the open were the plagerism and lying aspects.

It backfired on them.
9 posted on 06/03/2003 12:55:37 PM PDT by Grampa Dave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Liz; Pokey78
Oh, man, I'm loving the fact that dumped Dowd!
10 posted on 06/03/2003 12:59:39 PM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tvn
The holdouts apparently agree with Nancy Sharkey, the training and development editor who quit the panel last week, reportedly because she felt its mission had taken on the air of a witch hunt.

Sounds like the Times is using McCarthyistic-like tactics internally, eh?

11 posted on 06/03/2003 1:03:34 PM PDT by TheGeezer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tvn
Mr. Eyespy is a reporter, and he ALWAYS gets 2 sources, but he has 1 he trusts enough he may go with alone, if he can: he still has to justify this with his editor.

He has used anonymous sources before, but his immediate editor knew who it was, and the circumstances for this person remaining anonymous. It is a VERY RARE occassion.

This paper wanted certain stories to read certain ways, and allowed lies and innuendos to be used in place of news to achieve that end. They knew what they were doing.

I'm still waiting for Jayson Blair to be charged with some type of theft for the travel expenses.
12 posted on 06/03/2003 1:15:32 PM PDT by eyespysomething (Breaking down the stereotypes of soccer moms everyday!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tvn; All
Quote:
the Times's new publisher, Arthur "Pinch" Sulzberger Jr ... was a sixties anti-war activist who famously declared that in a confrontation between an American and a North Vietnamese soldier he'd want to see the American get shot."
Unquote.
Stanley Kurtz (NRO on line, June 5, 2001)
13 posted on 06/03/2003 1:22:24 PM PDT by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tvn
Bump
14 posted on 06/03/2003 1:39:53 PM PDT by The Californian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Liz
Thanks for the ping!
15 posted on 06/03/2003 1:57:24 PM PDT by mrustow (no tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tvn
Thanks for the list/post. See also:

The Great Black Hope: The Jayson Blair Case and the New York Times

16 posted on 06/03/2003 2:11:04 PM PDT by mrustow (no tag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Betcha Dowder wasn't that happy about it.....heheh.
17 posted on 06/03/2003 3:05:30 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: mrustow; Timesink; Bonaparte; PJ-Comix; Grampa Dave
SULZBERGER HOLDING D.C. STAFF SUMMIT .
18 posted on 06/03/2003 3:06:56 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: tvn
The Times they are a changin' - changin' the facts, that is!
19 posted on 06/03/2003 3:08:12 PM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave
.....readers ....demanded that the paper stop using The New York Times' news service.....

That oughta reverberate in editorial offices.

20 posted on 06/03/2003 3:10:09 PM PDT by Liz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-25 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson