Skip to comments.
Martha Stewart in criminal probe
Indictment expected in the near future
MSNBC .com
| 06.03.03
Posted on 06/03/2003 5:41:17 AM PDT by kcvl
Martha Stewart in criminal probe
Indictment expected in the near future
NEW YORK, June 3 Domestic taste-maker Martha Stewart is the target of a federal criminal probe, her company, Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc., said Tuesday.
A FEDERAL PROSECUTOR intends to ask a grand jury to return an indictment against Stewart in the near future, the company said in a press release.
TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: notagoodthing
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
1
posted on
06/03/2003 5:41:17 AM PDT
by
kcvl
To: kcvl
Justice delayed is justice denied. Get it on...
2
posted on
06/03/2003 5:42:57 AM PDT
by
Drango
(A liberal's compassion is limited only by the size of someone else's wallet.)
To: kcvl
This is probably already done. Indictments seem to be announced a few days after the fact.
3
posted on
06/03/2003 5:43:13 AM PDT
by
Galtoid
To: kcvl
Maybe they will make her a cook in prison.
4
posted on
06/03/2003 5:43:20 AM PDT
by
chance33_98
(www.hannahmore.com -- Shepherd Of Salisbury Plain is online, more to come! (my website))
To: Drango
Martha Stewart's company reports criminal investigation
Associated Press
NEW YORK -- Federal prosecutors are seeking a criminal indictment against Martha Stewart "in the near future," her media company said Tuesday.
Stewart has been under investigation on suspicion of insider trading involving shares she sold of biotech company ImClone Systems Inc. in December 2001.
The statement from Martha Stewart Living Omnimedia Inc. said Stewart's attorneys told the company that Stewart is the target of a criminal investigation by the U.S. Attorney's office for the Southern District of New York and that a civil complaint by the Securities and Exchange Commission also is expected.
The statement didn't elaborate on the possible charges.
The company said its board of directors has been planning for a number of possible contingencies, is evaluating the current situation and will take action as appropriate.
Federal authorities are investigating Stewart to learn if she sold ImClone shares because she had insider knowledge that the Food and Drug Administration was going to reject the company's application for its new colon cancer drug. Stewart has denied any wrongdoing in her ImClone sale.
A message left with Stewart's attorney before office hours was not immediately returned.
The U.S. attorney's office had no immediate comment when reached Tuesday morning.
5
posted on
06/03/2003 5:43:24 AM PDT
by
kcvl
To: kcvl
Just heard this on Fox News too. And it's her
company that's releasing the news!
Martha thinks this is a bad thing.....
Prairie
6
posted on
06/03/2003 5:44:25 AM PDT
by
prairiebreeze
(The faintest of ink is better than the strongest of memories.)
To: kcvl
She's on, she's off. She's on, she's off. She's on, she's off. She's on, she's off. She's on, she's off.
This is getting to be like the clinton scandals.... and I have a feeling, unfortunately for justices' sake, it will yield the same results. A big zero.
7
posted on
06/03/2003 5:51:50 AM PDT
by
b4its2late
(My mind not only wanders, sometimes it leaves completely.)
To: b4its2late
This is getting to be like the clinton scandals.... and I have a feeling, unfortunately for justices' sake, it will yield the same results. A big zero.Agree ... very similar in many respects ... with the same results.
8
posted on
06/03/2003 6:00:16 AM PDT
by
BluH2o
To: kcvl
I'll beleive it when I see it.
9
posted on
06/03/2003 6:03:21 AM PDT
by
freekitty
To: kcvl
It's about time!
To: chance33_98
I thinks she's semi-hot. Would like to pix of her 'cuffed.
To: chance33_98
Or maybe they'll make her into a decorator there.
"I thinks some lovely baby-blue velvet linens would be marvelous for the beds, along with some baby-blue cotton curtains, and a white antique ceiling fan..."
12
posted on
06/03/2003 6:18:33 AM PDT
by
4mycountry
(One taquila, two taquila, three taquila, floor.)
To: kcvl
I have a gut feeling she's not guilty. I think she's made some enemies along the way. Martha is too smart to be caught doing something so stupid.
13
posted on
06/03/2003 6:20:11 AM PDT
by
whereasandsoforth
(Martha will make an adorable sewing table out of the metal food tray)
To: kcvl; Liz
kcvl thanks for posting this.
Liz fyi!
14
posted on
06/03/2003 6:21:21 AM PDT
by
Grampa Dave
(Can anyone ever remember the NY Slimes printing a truthful story? I can't!)
To: Drango
Justice delayed is justice denied. Get it on... The real Wall Street crooks got away clean.
Martha is just the token sacrificial offering to satisfy the peasants' desire to see a rich person crucified.
15
posted on
06/03/2003 6:23:25 AM PDT
by
E. Pluribus Unum
(Drug prohibition laws help support terrorism.)
To: banjo joe
16
posted on
06/03/2003 6:25:19 AM PDT
by
Cagey
To: freekitty
My cousin's husband is a lawyer with the SEC. He said she was going to be indicted and he said this many months ago. I told him I'll believe it when I see it but....
17
posted on
06/03/2003 6:28:44 AM PDT
by
ladylib
To: prairiebreeze
For Martha's sake, I hope they use the stainless steel handcuffs and not those tacky tie-wrap plastic (shudder) cuffs.
18
posted on
06/03/2003 6:32:57 AM PDT
by
Catspaw
To: E. Pluribus Unum
The real Wall Street crooks got away clean. As did the FDA official who improperly leaked the information to Imclone in the first place.
Martha Stewart was not an employee or executive of Imclone. She got a tip about the company and made a rational decision to sell her stock. This should not be a crime.
19
posted on
06/03/2003 6:33:28 AM PDT
by
HAL9000
To: banjo joe
I thinks she's semi-hot. Would like to pix of her 'cuffed.Naughty. Get in line. I'm hot for martha. Though shes blimped out - I couldnt beleive how big she was about 6 weeks ago. I hate it when that happens.
20
posted on
06/03/2003 6:51:31 AM PDT
by
corkoman
(did someone say WOD?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-67 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson