Skip to comments.
Bwwwwaaaaahh! It's only a mass grave with thousands of dead Iraqis!
Registered@aol.com ^
| 05.31.03
| Rgistered
Posted on 05/30/2003 10:21:31 PM PDT by Registered
TOPICS: Anthrax Scare; Editorial; Political Humor/Cartoons; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 2004; biglosers; dems; graspingstraws; iraqifreedom; leftsucks; loosers; losers; massgraves; registeredhumor; talkingskeletons; whiners; wmd
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: takeashiitebaath
Sure they would, and the same argument could be made for Adolph Hitler.
My argument is..... We lost over 300 of our finest in Operation Desert Storm and Saddam signed a cease fire agreement in order to remain in power and he violated every single provision of that agreement and as far as I'm concerned we owed to those who died in 1991 to squash that egotistical tyrant like a bug PERIOD. To hell with all the leftist hand wringers, They just need to stay out of the way, while we finish the job we started.
21
posted on
05/30/2003 11:01:58 PM PDT
by
MJY1288
("4" more in "04")
To: Registered
Vote Democrat. It's easier than thinking. Good one!
22
posted on
05/30/2003 11:08:06 PM PDT
by
Tribune7
To: Registered
OMG, is that graphic you used a true image from Iraq??!!??!! I haven't seen that one yet, how horrible :-(
Great post again, as always - you have a terrific way of crystalizing the liberal-morality-quagmire...
23
posted on
05/30/2003 11:40:52 PM PDT
by
Tamzee
(A half-truth is a whole lie .......Yiddish Proverb)
To: Registered
God Bless you, Registered. You make my work in finding a Pic of the Week for my site so easy!! :)
Great work!
-Jay
24
posted on
05/31/2003 12:10:40 AM PDT
by
Jay D. Dyson
(When the smoke cleared, the terrorist was over there...and over there...and over there...)
To: MJY1288
That's exactly what some of us have been saying and thinking, you and I and a few others.
The most shrill and loud democrats that jump on any and everything to paint Bush as some kind of monster that just makes stuff up to get a war on track are amazingly silent. When was the last time Daschle passed up an opportunity to call the President a liar? Never, except on this issue. He knows. Hillary knows. they all know. The media is about to take a credibility dump (again). The democrats that assimilate any stroke are running big time from the WMD issue. Dashcle even went as far as defending Bush on MTP 2 weeks ago when gaoded by Timmy to bash Bush on lack of WMD discoveries.
It just does not make sense for any democrat that calls himself a real demoocrat, with the press carrying his/her water in super-tankers to stay quiet on this issue if it had any possibliity of getting traction, even in the very short term.
The left's silence, sans media left, is more telling than anything that the right could say on the WMD, or alleged lack thereof.
25
posted on
05/31/2003 12:33:46 AM PDT
by
EERinOK
To: Registered
Logical, and funny too!!
26
posted on
05/31/2003 1:05:53 AM PDT
by
miltonim
To: Registered
How could the war be legitimate if we don't find the WMD? The President and Tony Blair assured us that we MUST take preventive action against Iraq or they would use their WMD against us in the future. This was cited as the MAJOR reason for going to war.
We are not going to war with Sudan even though they have been killing and enslaving Christians for years.
To: Registered
bump
To: Registered
I'm not sure about the skull and the "thank you President Bush." I know what you mean, but I'm a Bush supporter. A DemRat might know what you mean.
I'm not sure a sheeple would, though. They might see the skull meaning "thank you (very much) president Bush (for doing this TO us.)
I might change it to: Thank you President Bush for bringing our murder to light. Wordy...but clear.
Just a suggestion meant in good faith.
29
posted on
05/31/2003 5:44:39 AM PDT
by
HatSteel
To: HatSteel
Is it just me, or is this another masterstroke by Bush to set one of his magnificent traps for the press/media/Dims and other detractors? It seems the media has glommed on this "no WMD" and it is hitting a peak. I think they're all about to hang themselves with their own ropes.
30
posted on
05/31/2003 7:22:47 AM PDT
by
Galtoid
To: SwordofTruth
Has Sudan invaded any country that is one of our allies? Would you say that the Sudanese government is as dangerous a threat to our security as Hussein's was? Is Sudan bound by the provisions of U.N article 1441 like Hussein was?
31
posted on
05/31/2003 9:00:14 AM PDT
by
driftless
( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: Registered
Perfect!
To: Registered
Yep. Vote Democrat.
Good job, again.
To: Registered
RIDICULE!
The key to success against the Democrats!
'Rats not only know the GOP are usually mild-mannered, conservative, forgiving and moral, they depend on it.
The 'Rats useD to laugh incessantly when the reasoned GOP would solemnly debate their knowingly ludicrous demands for slave reparations, higher taxes on the rich, affirmative action, gay marriage benefits, etc. and then work out some compromise in the 'Rats favor.
ENOUGH!
Start skewering these vermin, start breaking heads, and don't give them a moment's respect or legitimize their blackmail with debate.
RIDICULE THEM!
For a better America.
(pass it on!)
34
posted on
05/31/2003 12:54:49 PM PDT
by
Enduring Freedom
(To smash the ugly face of Socialism is our mission.)
Comment #35 Removed by Moderator
To: driftless
I>Has Sudan invaded any country that is one of our allies?
Are Christians not our allies?
GWB claims to be a Christian. Why would he help the Muslims of Iraq and not help the Christians of Sudan?
Would you say that the Sudanese government is as dangerous a threat to our security as Hussein's was?
So far we have found no weapons of mass destruction in Iraq, so I would say that Sudan appears to be just as much a threat to the USA as Iraq was.
Is Sudan bound by the provisions of U.N article 1441 like Hussein was?
Should Sudan be allowed to murder and enslave Christians with out no repercussions just because the UN doesn't care?
To: SwordofTruth
You're not answering my questions. Hussein had and probably still has hidden WMDs. He used them. He invaded a foreign country. He had the ability to supply terrorists with WMDs and undoubtedly would have if not stopped. If Sudan had done all that yes, we would have to take military action against it. I'm under no illusions as to the evilness of the Sudanese government. But we should only endanger our troops when the threat to us is outstanding as was the Iraqi threat in my opinion.
37
posted on
05/31/2003 6:54:19 PM PDT
by
driftless
( For life-long happiness, learn how to play the accordion.)
To: Registered
Excellent graphic. My only hesitation in passing it around is the "Vote Democrat/it's easier than thinking"---If you substitute Republican for Democrat, how many would be insulted rather than swayed by indicating lack of intelligence?...just a thought:: Vote Democrat/human rights are for americans
38
posted on
05/31/2003 8:30:31 PM PDT
by
Susannah
(If you go carrying pictures of Chairman Mao; you ain't gonna make it with anyone, anyhow. ~ Beatles)
To: Registered
Very good Registered. Cuts right to the bone.
39
posted on
05/31/2003 9:05:44 PM PDT
by
SAMWolf
(Nothing is so smiple that it can't get screwed up.)
To: SAMWolf
Thanks, bumping.
40
posted on
06/01/2003 8:51:47 PM PDT
by
Registered
("Status Quo" is Latin for "the mess we're in")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson