Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wolfowitz says Saudi troop withdrawal was 'huge' reason for war with Iraq
Associated Press ^

Posted on 05/30/2003 1:11:24 PM PDT by fritter

Wolfowitz says Saudi troop withdrawal was 'huge' reason for war with Iraq

Associated Press

BRUSSELS, Belgium -- European critics of the Iraq war expressed shock Friday at published remarks by a senior U.S. official playing down Iraq's weapons of mass destruction as the reason for the conflict.

In an interview in the next issue of Vanity Fair magazine, Deputy Defense Secretary Paul Wolfowitz cited "bureaucratic reasons" for focusing on Saddam Hussein's alleged arsenal and said a "huge" reason for the war was to enable Washington to withdraw its troops from Saudi Arabia.

"For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on," Wolfowitz was quoted as saying.

He said one reason for going to war against Iraq that was "almost unnoticed but huge" was the need to maintain American forces in Saudi Arabia as long as Saddam was in power.

Those troops were sent to Saudi Arabia to protect the desert kingdom against Saddam, whose forces invaded Kuwait in 1991, but their presence in the country that houses Islam's holiest sites enraged Islamic fundamentalists, including Osama bin Laden.

Within two weeks of the fall of Baghdad, the United States announced it was removing most of its 5,000 troops from Saudi Arabia and would set up its main regional command center in Qatar.

However, those goals were not spelled out publicly as the United States sought to build international support for the war. Instead, the Bush administration focused on Saddam's failure to dismantle chemical, biological and nuclear weapons programs.

The failure of U.S. forces to locate extensive weapons stocks has raised doubts in a skeptical Europe whether Iraq represented a global security threat.

Wolfowitz's comments followed a statement by Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld, who suggested this week that Saddam might have destroyed his banned weapons before the war began.

On Friday, the commander of U.S. Marines in Iraq said he was surprised that extensive searches have failed to discover any of the chemical weapons that U.S. intelligence had indicated were supplied to front line Iraqi forces at the outset of the war.

"Believe me, it's not for lack of trying," Lt. Gen. James Conway told reporters. "We've been to virtually every ammunition supply point between the Kuwaiti border and Baghdad, but they're simply not there."

The remarks by Wolfowitz and Rumsfeld revived the controversy over the war as President Bush left for a European tour in which he hopes to put aside the bitterness over the war, which threatened the trans-Atlantic partnership.

In Denmark, whose government supported the war, opposition parties demanded to know whether Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen misled the public about the extent of Saddam's weapons threat.

"It was not what the Danish prime minister said when he advocated support for the war," Jeppe Kofod, the Social Democrats' foreign affairs spokesman, said in response to Wolfowitz's comments. "Those who went to war now have a big problem explaining it."

Former Danish Foreign Minister Niels Helveg Petersen said he was shocked by Wolfowitz's claim. "It leaves the world with one question: What should we believe?" he told The Associated Press.

In Germany, where the war was widely unpopular, the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeiting newspaper said the comments about Iraqi weapons showed that America is losing the battle for credibility.

"The charge of deception is inescapable," the newspaper said Friday.

In London, former British Foreign Secretary Robin Cook, who quit as leader of the House of Commons to protest the war, said he doubted Iraq had any such weapons.

"The war was sold on the basis of what was described as a pre-emptive strike, 'Hit Saddam before he hits us,' " Cook told British Broadcasting Corp. "It is now quite clear that Saddam did not have anything with which to hit us in the first place."

During a visit to Poland, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said Friday he has "absolutely no doubt" that concrete evidence will be found of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction.

"Have a little patience," Blair told reporters.

Wolfowitz was in Singapore, where he is due to speak Saturday at the Asia Security Conference of military chiefs and defense ministers from Asian and key Western powers.

He told reporters at the conference that the United States will reorganize its forces worldwide to confront the threat of terrorism.

"We are in the process of taking a fundamental look at our military posture worldwide, including in the United States," Wolfowitz said. "We're facing a very different threat than any one we've faced historically."


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: bushdoctrineunfold; iraq; iraqifreedom; paulwolfowitz; warlist; whywefight
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-232 next last

1 posted on 05/30/2003 1:11:24 PM PDT by fritter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: fritter
Hey, I said this months ago. It wasn't about WMD it was about us needing a base in the Middle East to base our troops outside of Saudi Arabia. Now we have one -- the Western Iraqi desert. Anyone who thinks we are going to pull out of Iraq anytime in the next 20 years has never played Risk. Or Go. Or any other geopolitical strategy wargame.
2 posted on 05/30/2003 1:14:31 PM PDT by dark_lord (The Statue of Liberty now holds a baseball bat and she's yelling 'You want a piece of me?')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fritter
During a visit to Poland, British Prime Minister Tony Blair said Friday he has "absolutely no doubt" that concrete evidence will be found of Saddam's weapons of mass destruction.

I'd say the two trailers they found are evidence enough. I'm sure they weren't used as mobile hospitals..........

3 posted on 05/30/2003 1:15:25 PM PDT by b4its2late ("Do, or do not. There is no 'try'." - Yoda ('The Empire Strikes Back'))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dark_lord
and I said that W and Abdullah were solving the problems and remaking the area.
4 posted on 05/30/2003 1:16:47 PM PDT by bert (Don't Panic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: fritter
***
"For bureaucratic reasons we settled on one issue, weapons of mass destruction, because it was the one reason everyone could agree on," Wolfowitz was quoted as saying***

As far as I can see Wolfowitz never said there were no WMDs. He merely said that they "settled on one issue." That's not to say that there were no other issues. He was either quoted out of context, or he needs a little preparation on how to present the facts.
5 posted on 05/30/2003 1:23:55 PM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kitkat
And the leftist press ran away with it.
6 posted on 05/30/2003 1:25:16 PM PDT by kitkat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fritter; Ernest_at_the_Beach
"and said a "huge" reason for the war was to enable Washington to withdraw its troops from Saudi Arabia."

The Crawford Plan as I explained weeks ago.

Ernest, Remember? (Bush Doctrine Unfolds)

7 posted on 05/30/2003 1:28:03 PM PDT by blam
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kitkat
Of course, Wolfowitz was quoted out of context. Drudge will have the full correct quote later on his web site.
8 posted on 05/30/2003 1:28:11 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: fritter
It is my understanding that Wolfowitz recorded this interview and the tape does not confirm the magazine's conclusions. Anyone surprised!!!
9 posted on 05/30/2003 1:28:56 PM PDT by OldFriend (without the brave, there would be no land of the free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
What! The press would mislead us? I'm shocked!
10 posted on 05/30/2003 1:34:56 PM PDT by MEG33
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
It is my understanding that Wolfowitz recorded this interview and the tape does not confirm the magazine's conclusions. Anyone surprised!!!

Vanity Fair is not known for its strong affection for conservatives. It's a kneepad magazine servicing Hollywood stars.

11 posted on 05/30/2003 1:37:01 PM PDT by Timesink
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: fritter
Does anyone see a pattern developing here?

The media, it appears is in complete and total meltdown.

They are not getting what they need from the Bush Administration to support their agenda, so they are left with only the option to make things up to further their cause.

All this says to me, is that Bush's policy of secrecy is driving these people insane. Maureen Dowd's misquote of Bush, and now this, are testimony enough to suggest that Bush is destroying the media as much as he is the Democrats.

They are whining about a segment of society not getting tax cut, but they wont mention the fact that that same segment pays no taxes at all.

When the left has to resort to this kind of distortion, it is only proof that our side is winning the battle.
12 posted on 05/30/2003 1:39:39 PM PDT by Pukin Dog (Sans Reproache)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fritter
Former Danish Foreign Minister Niels Helveg Petersen said he was shocked by Wolfowitz's claim. "It leaves the world with one question: What should we believe?" he told The Associated Press.

Believe that the United States of America will NOT be f---ed around with.

13 posted on 05/30/2003 1:42:28 PM PDT by Physicist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: OldFriend
I think I read some place that DOD has the text of the whole interview up on a Web site. Does anybody have the URL?
14 posted on 05/30/2003 1:42:29 PM PDT by aristeides
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Comment #15 Removed by Moderator

To: GW469
Sir, you are misrepresenting the facts. I guess I should be shocked at your ignorance. I'm afarid I'm not...
16 posted on 05/30/2003 1:48:48 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: Fury
But I am shocked at my spelling! Afarid = afraid
17 posted on 05/30/2003 1:50:47 PM PDT by Fury
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: GW469
Don't panic, it's only your first day.
18 posted on 05/30/2003 1:53:55 PM PDT by dmeara
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: aristeides
http://www.defenselink.mil/transcripts/2003/tr20030509-depsecdef0223.html
19 posted on 05/30/2003 1:57:45 PM PDT by rwfok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: fritter
Is Wolfy trying to get fired?
20 posted on 05/30/2003 1:58:43 PM PDT by BlueNgold (Feed the Tree .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 221-232 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson