Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bear Snacks on US Sub ("Quite unbearable, really.")
New.Com.Au ^ | May 29,2003 | Scott Jenkins

Posted on 05/30/2003 9:10:53 AM PDT by yankeedame

Bear snacks on US sub

By Scott Jenkins
May 29, 2003

IT'S not often a submariner would see a polar bear in his periscope, but that's exactly what happened recently in Prudehoe Bay off the northern coast of Alaska.


The USS Connecticut meets the bear

During training exercises near the North Pole, the submarine USS Connecticut poked its sail and fin through the ice.

An officer turned on the scope's camera and this bizarre image of a bear trying to eat the sub's rear fin was the result.

The bear played with the fin for half an hour, thinking the giant object was food.

After realising his find was inedible, he decided to do the natural bear thing and attack.

But the assault lasted only a few minutes and the damage to the sub's fin was described as being minor.

The structure wasn't designed as a polar bear snack, but life's like that sometimes.

More than 20,000 polar bears live in Arctic waters.

They normally reside on pack ice or ice floes and usually prey on seals.

But this curious fellow couldn't believe his luck when the rudder made its appearance.

US and Russian subs have been operating under the Arctic for more than half a century.

In 1958, the USS Nautilus passed under the Pole for the first time, and in 1962 two nuclear subs surfaced there. All of this activity was designed to prove that ballistic missiles could be launched from the Pole.

The subs have also measured the thickness of the Arctic crust using sonar technology, and the ever-decreasing thickness has caused major problems for the bear population.

Some of them have been forced to come ashore earlier because of the Arctic's longer warm season.

The USS Connecticut is one of newest US submarines and it's unlikely that encounters with polar bears were included in the operations manual.

Submariners have seen polar bears in the past, but this is probably the first time the bear saw the sub first and mistook it for a huge chunk of bear food.

In a strange twist, to be filed under "It Could Only Happen in America", the USS Connecticut and its crew may end up with legal problems over the run-in with the bear.

The US Marine Mammal Protection Act makes it illegal to cause disruption to any animal's normal marine behaviour.

And this includes interrupting their feeding patterns.

Because the sub didn't immediately return below the surface, its actions could be determined to be "disruptive".

Quite unbearable, really.

The Daily Telegraph


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ussconnecticut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

1 posted on 05/30/2003 9:10:54 AM PDT by yankeedame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
this is series. I mean really hugh...
its' not like it was a moose or anything...
2 posted on 05/30/2003 9:12:19 AM PDT by camle (no camle jokes, please...OK, maybe one little one)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
...in the immortal words of Homer Simpson..

"MMMMMM.....SUB...."

3 posted on 05/30/2003 9:13:02 AM PDT by Fedupwithit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
"The US Marine Mammal Protection Act makes it illegal to cause disruption to any animal's normal marine behaviour.

Hey....couldn't we use this act....couldn't we institute a "normal behavior" rule....for HUMAN mammals? If we can do it for polar bears, can't we do it for humans?

4 posted on 05/30/2003 9:14:53 AM PDT by goodnesswins (For Lease.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Ummmm man - this is the mother of all seals; but damn...its awfully tough.
5 posted on 05/30/2003 9:15:48 AM PDT by HardStarboard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Maybe it thought it was a sub sandwich.
6 posted on 05/30/2003 9:16:33 AM PDT by VRWCmember (Stanley Cup - back to Jersey; NBA Title - back to Texas (San Antonio, that is))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
This bears repeating....rudder nonsense.
7 posted on 05/30/2003 9:19:42 AM PDT by Rennes Templar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
I would love to have a Polar bear rug. It's not p.c. so flame away.
8 posted on 05/30/2003 9:20:41 AM PDT by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Purely wild polar bears are probably the most dangerous animal in the world, even surpassing tigers. They are one of the few large predators who have absolutely no enemy in their environment, no threats, and so everything they see is just potential food.

9 posted on 05/30/2003 9:20:41 AM PDT by HighWheeler (def.- Democrats: n. from Greek; “democ” - many; “rats” - ugly, filthy, bloodsucking parasites.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Because the sub didn't immediately return below the surface, its actions could be determined to be "disruptive".

So, they are going to send a U.S. Fish and Game agent, armed with a 9mm, to take a nuke sub?

10 posted on 05/30/2003 9:21:23 AM PDT by Blue Screen of Death
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
Purely wild polar bears are probably the most dangerous animal in the world, even surpassing tigers. They are one of the few large predators who have absolutely no enemy in their environment, no threats, and so everything they see is just potential food.

That and they are the only bear that will stalk humans.

11 posted on 05/30/2003 9:22:27 AM PDT by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Blue Screen of Death
Because the sub didn't immediately return below the surface, its actions could be determined to be "disruptive".

Any submariners out there? Maybe they didn't submerge due to the proximity of the bear and the potential harm that could have come the bears way as a result.

12 posted on 05/30/2003 9:24:26 AM PDT by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
The US Marine Mammal Protection Act makes it illegal to cause disruption to any animal's normal marine behaviour. And this includes interrupting their feeding patterns. Because the sub didn't immediately return below the surface, its actions could be determined to be "disruptive".

That is completely untrue from the technical requirements of that law. You may not approach within 1500 feet or so of the protected animal. But if it comes to you, that is permissable. Anyways, submerging suddenly may have dragged this stupid bear underwater and drowned the silly creature.

13 posted on 05/30/2003 9:24:42 AM PDT by Paul Ross (From the State Looking Forward to Global Warming! Let's Drown France!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: camle
Just wondering how did they take the picture?
14 posted on 05/30/2003 9:24:54 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Who took the picture?
15 posted on 05/30/2003 9:26:02 AM PDT by WellsFargo94
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
A hunting friend of mine described polar bears as always hungry...and humans are on the menu.
16 posted on 05/30/2003 9:26:49 AM PDT by appalachian_dweller (Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they are not out to get me. Pass the tinfoil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
Just wondering how did they take the picture?

They used a Kodiak!

(ducking for cover)

17 posted on 05/30/2003 9:27:31 AM PDT by Jonah Hex
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: WellsFargo94
It's not p.c. so flame away.

Here? No. You'll find folks who will want to join you in line. LOL!

18 posted on 05/30/2003 9:27:46 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Jonah Hex; Steve Van Doorn; WellsFargo94
Yeah, you should duck for cover...a Kodiak...for shame!!!

The bear is standing by the sub's tail fin, the picture was taken from the sub's periscope in the conning tower.
19 posted on 05/30/2003 9:29:08 AM PDT by HiJinx (The right person, in the right place, at the right time...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Steve Van Doorn
Just wondering how did they take the picture?

My guess is that they used a camera.

20 posted on 05/30/2003 9:29:19 AM PDT by Dr Warmoose (Just don't leave any brass with your fingerprints on it behind, OK?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-45 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson