Skip to comments.
Bear Snacks on US Sub ("Quite unbearable, really.")
New.Com.Au ^
| May 29,2003
| Scott Jenkins
Posted on 05/30/2003 9:10:53 AM PDT by yankeedame
Bear snacks on US sub
By Scott Jenkins
May 29, 2003
IT'S not often a submariner would see a polar bear in his periscope, but that's exactly what happened recently in Prudehoe Bay off the northern coast of Alaska.

The USS Connecticut meets the bear
During training exercises near the North Pole, the submarine USS Connecticut poked its sail and fin through the ice.
An officer turned on the scope's camera and this bizarre image of a bear trying to eat the sub's rear fin was the result.
The bear played with the fin for half an hour, thinking the giant object was food.
After realising his find was inedible, he decided to do the natural bear thing and attack.
But the assault lasted only a few minutes and the damage to the sub's fin was described as being minor.
The structure wasn't designed as a polar bear snack, but life's like that sometimes.
More than 20,000 polar bears live in Arctic waters.
They normally reside on pack ice or ice floes and usually prey on seals.
But this curious fellow couldn't believe his luck when the rudder made its appearance.
US and Russian subs have been operating under the Arctic for more than half a century.
In 1958, the USS Nautilus passed under the Pole for the first time, and in 1962 two nuclear subs surfaced there. All of this activity was designed to prove that ballistic missiles could be launched from the Pole.
The subs have also measured the thickness of the Arctic crust using sonar technology, and the ever-decreasing thickness has caused major problems for the bear population.
Some of them have been forced to come ashore earlier because of the Arctic's longer warm season.
The USS Connecticut is one of newest US submarines and it's unlikely that encounters with polar bears were included in the operations manual.
Submariners have seen polar bears in the past, but this is probably the first time the bear saw the sub first and mistook it for a huge chunk of bear food.
In a strange twist, to be filed under "It Could Only Happen in America", the USS Connecticut and its crew may end up with legal problems over the run-in with the bear.
The US Marine Mammal Protection Act makes it illegal to cause disruption to any animal's normal marine behaviour.
And this includes interrupting their feeding patterns.
Because the sub didn't immediately return below the surface, its actions could be determined to be "disruptive".
Quite unbearable, really.
The Daily Telegraph
TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: ussconnecticut
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
To: yankeedame
this is series. I mean really hugh...
its' not like it was a moose or anything...
2
posted on
05/30/2003 9:12:19 AM PDT
by
camle
(no camle jokes, please...OK, maybe one little one)
To: yankeedame
...in the immortal words of Homer Simpson..
"MMMMMM.....SUB...."
To: yankeedame
"The US Marine Mammal Protection Act makes it illegal to cause disruption to any animal's normal marine behaviour. Hey....couldn't we use this act....couldn't we institute a "normal behavior" rule....for HUMAN mammals? If we can do it for polar bears, can't we do it for humans?
4
posted on
05/30/2003 9:14:53 AM PDT
by
goodnesswins
(For Lease.....)
To: yankeedame
Ummmm man - this is the mother of all seals; but damn...its awfully tough.
To: yankeedame
Maybe it thought it was a sub sandwich.
6
posted on
05/30/2003 9:16:33 AM PDT
by
VRWCmember
(Stanley Cup - back to Jersey; NBA Title - back to Texas (San Antonio, that is))
To: yankeedame
This bears repeating....rudder nonsense.
To: yankeedame
I would love to have a Polar bear rug. It's not p.c. so flame away.
To: yankeedame
Purely wild polar bears are probably the most dangerous animal in the world, even surpassing tigers. They are one of the few large predators who have absolutely no enemy in their environment, no threats, and so everything they see is just potential food.
9
posted on
05/30/2003 9:20:41 AM PDT
by
HighWheeler
(def.- Democrats: n. from Greek; “democ” - many; “rats” - ugly, filthy, bloodsucking parasites.)
To: yankeedame
Because the sub didn't immediately return below the surface, its actions could be determined to be "disruptive". So, they are going to send a U.S. Fish and Game agent, armed with a 9mm, to take a nuke sub?
To: HighWheeler
Purely wild polar bears are probably the most dangerous animal in the world, even surpassing tigers. They are one of the few large predators who have absolutely no enemy in their environment, no threats, and so everything they see is just potential food. That and they are the only bear that will stalk humans.
To: Blue Screen of Death
Because the sub didn't immediately return below the surface, its actions could be determined to be "disruptive".Any submariners out there? Maybe they didn't submerge due to the proximity of the bear and the potential harm that could have come the bears way as a result.
To: yankeedame
The US Marine Mammal Protection Act makes it illegal to cause disruption to any animal's normal marine behaviour. And this includes interrupting their feeding patterns. Because the sub didn't immediately return below the surface, its actions could be determined to be "disruptive". That is completely untrue from the technical requirements of that law. You may not approach within 1500 feet or so of the protected animal. But if it comes to you, that is permissable. Anyways, submerging suddenly may have dragged this stupid bear underwater and drowned the silly creature.
13
posted on
05/30/2003 9:24:42 AM PDT
by
Paul Ross
(From the State Looking Forward to Global Warming! Let's Drown France!)
To: camle
Just wondering how did they take the picture?
To: yankeedame
Who took the picture?
To: HighWheeler
A hunting friend of mine described polar bears as always hungry...and humans are on the menu.
16
posted on
05/30/2003 9:26:49 AM PDT
by
appalachian_dweller
(Just because I'm paranoid doesn't mean they are not out to get me. Pass the tinfoil.)
To: Steve Van Doorn
Just wondering how did they take the picture? They used a Kodiak!
(ducking for cover)
To: WellsFargo94
It's not p.c. so flame away. Here? No. You'll find folks who will want to join you in line. LOL!
18
posted on
05/30/2003 9:27:46 AM PDT
by
twigs
To: Jonah Hex; Steve Van Doorn; WellsFargo94
Yeah, you should duck for cover...a Kodiak...for shame!!!
The bear is standing by the sub's tail fin, the picture was taken from the sub's periscope in the conning tower.
19
posted on
05/30/2003 9:29:08 AM PDT
by
HiJinx
(The right person, in the right place, at the right time...)
To: Steve Van Doorn
Just wondering how did they take the picture? My guess is that they used a camera.
20
posted on
05/30/2003 9:29:19 AM PDT
by
Dr Warmoose
(Just don't leave any brass with your fingerprints on it behind, OK?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-45 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson