Skip to comments.
Do We Live In A "Stop And Go" Universe?
spaceref.com ^
| 27 May 03
| staff
Posted on 05/27/2003 4:15:08 PM PDT by RightWhale
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 last
To: Swordmaker
Yes you're right. I should have said that the faster the cosmological object is receding the higher its red-shift.
SOME objects, M-31 for example are approaching us, and are shifted towards blue, in consequence.
The simplist explanation for differing red-shifts is that the objects you are speaking of have a relative motion towards us, while continuing to recede with the rest of the universe, hence moving away, but at a slower pace. The fast objects have a relative motion AWAY from us combined with the Universal Expansion, ipso facto, they have a higher red-shift.
Heck, we can detect differences in the red-shift of stars in a spiral galaxy seen edge-on. The edge that is moving away is more red-shifted than the edge that is moving closer, while the center of the galaxy has a third measurment. The entire galaxy is moving away but one edge is moving away at a faster rate (higher red-shift) than the other, or the galaxy as a whole.
Also I must ask. Since we can use either Ia Supernovae or Red-shift or a combination of both to determine distance, beyond the 100 ly that parallax allows, how can you be sure that the higher red-shifted objects you mentioned are not, in fact, further away?
Answer. You cannot be certain.
To: The Shootist
Since we can use either Ia Supernovae or Red-shift or a combination of both to determine distance, beyond the 100 ly that parallax allows, how can you be sure that the higher red-shifted objects you mentioned are not, in fact, further away? Answer. You cannot be certain.
Bingo. That is why it is healthy to occasionally re-examine the assumptions that were accepted when theories were first created.
62
posted on
05/28/2003 12:50:22 AM PDT
by
Swordmaker
(Tagline Extermination Services, franchises available, small investment, big profit)
To: RightWhale
I don't like the "stop-and-go" or the "big bang" theories. I'll be glad when they come up with a new pet theory for a change.
63
posted on
05/28/2003 1:04:04 AM PDT
by
Consort
To: RightWhale
Hm. The computer that seemed right snappy five years ago is intolerable to use now. Maybe someday it'll be snappy again?
To: LiteKeeper
The paper itself is 50 pages long, but interesting if you like to read chem lab reports. Nothing but chemistry, no physics. Maybe that's what cosmology is become, statistical analysis from an HPLC.
65
posted on
05/28/2003 9:08:35 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(gazing at shadows)
To: aruanan
There was a thread last week about some new physics lab device that can shift a light spectrum just about any amount by a series of internal reflections and an energy input at the right time. Might be related.
66
posted on
05/28/2003 9:11:17 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(gazing at shadows)
To: RightWhale
BUMP for later.
To: Consort
I'll be glad when they come up with a new pet theory for a change Watch French cosmologists. They are highly imaginative, and natural rebels.
68
posted on
05/28/2003 10:23:37 AM PDT
by
RightWhale
(gazing at shadows)
To: gcruse
...appear to be quantized...Isn't this explained by the fact that galaxies are arranged in sheets with voids in between?
To: Virginia-American
I don't think so. The thing is that changes in the red shift occur at quantum intervals, like the change in energy when electrons change shells. The article at the link could explain better than I could.
70
posted on
05/28/2003 7:13:02 PM PDT
by
gcruse
(Vice is nice, but virtue can hurt you. --Bill Bennett)
To: The Shootist
The Sagnac effect is explained here:
http://www.mathpages.com/rr/s2-07/2-07.htm Pay particular attention to:
"Special relativity for a Sagnac device are correct and entail no logical inconsistency, the dedicated opponents of special relativity sometimes resort to claims that there is nevertheless an inconsistency in the relativistic interpretation of what's really happening locally around the device in certain extreme circumstances. The fundamental fallacy underlying such claims is the idea that the beams of light are travelling the same, or at least congruent, inertial paths through space and time as they proceed from the source to the detector. If this were true, their inertial speeds would indeed need to differ in order for their arrival times at the detector to differ. However, the two pulses do not traverse congruent paths from emission to detector (assuming the device is absolutely rotating). The co-rotating beam is travelling slightly farther than the counter-rotating beam in the inertial sense, because the detector is moving away from the former and toward the latter while they are in transit. Naturally the ratio of optical path lengths is the same with respect to any fixed system of inertial coordinates."
This shows that the times of flight of east-west vs west-east are unequal.
Now look at my flatcar experiment. The path lengths of the light are unequal, as it is moving. Let's say it's moving with an astronomical radius in a circular path to make it "non-inertial", but for the time of flight it's virtually inertial. According to the Sagnac Effect, the light arrives at two different times because the length of each light path is different. Since the observers see unequal arrival times, but they sense only inertial movement because of the large radius, they can only conclude the speed of light is different in the same "inertial" reference frame.
So how do you resolve this?
FYI:
http://www.physics.umd.edu/rgroups/quantum.html "The East-West vs. West-East light propagation time experiments are being reactivated with the use of circular scan streak tubes as timing devices. It is hoped that resolution of ~ 10 ps can be achieved. The direct comparison of the one-way propagation times on the rotating Earth has never been done at this precision and in this way. Our knowledge is not secure as to whether the speed of light should be ± c or v ± c, where v is the tangential speed of the Earth's surface. "
US Naval Observatory:
http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/ptti/index9.html Differential Comparison of the One-Way Speed of Light in
the East-West and West-East Directions on the Rotating
Earth; C. O. Alley, R. A. Nelson, Y. H. Shil, J. T.
Broomfield, J. A. Fogelman, M. A. Perry, J. D. Raynor,
C. A. Steggerda, B. C. Wang, M. J. Chandler, and L. J.
Rueger
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
"ah...Ah...AH...AHHHHH-CHOOOO!!"
To: Eastbound
"ah...Ah...AH...AHHHHH-CHOOOO!!" According to the "Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy" there is a race of beings called Jatravartids :
Jatravartids
The Jatravartid People of Viltvodle Six firmly believe that the entire universe was sneezed out of the nose of a being called The Great Green Arkleseizure. They live in perpetual fear of the time they call The Coming Of The Great White Handkerchief.
The Jatravartids are small blue creatures with more than fifty arms each, who are therefore unique in being the only race in history to have invented the aerosol deodorant before the wheel.
To: Bloody Sam Roberts
"The Jatravartid People of Viltvodle Six firmly believe that the entire universe was sneezed out of the nose of a being called The Great Green Arkleseizure." Whoa! Art imitating life? Okay, how did they know? ;)
To: RightWhale
Wow! Variable entropy! Looking like we can't depend on anything to stay constant!
75
posted on
05/29/2003 7:04:22 PM PDT
by
6ppc
To: RightWhale
We will find out what is causing this expansion and stop it. We will also find out what makes the stars burn out so quickly. We will make the universe last a million times longer than it would if left to nature, and then we will extend that a million times more. Soooo...this would be called a "sustainable universe"? I can see algore now...
76
posted on
05/29/2003 7:07:49 PM PDT
by
6ppc
To: RightWhale
We will find out what is causing this expansion and stop it. We will also find out what makes the stars burn out so quickly. We will make the universe last a million times longer than it would if left to nature, and then we will extend that a million times more. -J D Bernal
When weve been there ten thousand years,
Bright shining as the sun,
Weve no less days to sing Gods praise
Than when wed first begun.
-- "Amazing Grace," by John (no relation to Isaac) Newton.
77
posted on
05/29/2003 7:14:48 PM PDT
by
JoeSchem
(Okay, now it works: Knight's Quest, at http://wwwgeocities.com/engineerzero)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-77 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson