Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Peterson had called girlfriend
The Fresno Bee ^ | Published Saturday, May 24, 2003, 5:53 AM) | John Cote and Garth Stapely

Posted on 05/25/2003 7:33:51 AM PDT by runningbear

Peterson had called girlfriend

Peterson had called girlfriend
Suspect in killing of Laci Peterson talked with Amber Frey after she went to police.

By Garth Stapley and John Coté
The Modesto Bee
(Published Saturday, May 24, 2003, 5:53 AM)

MODESTO -- Scott Peterson talked with his girlfriend four weeks after his pregnant wife was reported missing, according to court documents filed late Friday. The wiretap documents reveal that Scott Peterson called Amber Frey and discussed his hiring of a private investigator. The call came late on Jan. 20, almost a month after Frey had gone to police to tell them about her romantic relationship with Peterson, and four days before she went public with the information.

The documents also reveal that authorities intercepted 69 calls between Peterson and his Modesto attorney and two calls between Peterson and his private investigator.

In other developments Friday:

Two sources confirmed autopsy information that Laci Peterson's body was recovered without its head and feet.

A woman from the Petersons' neighborhood who resembles Laci Peterson told The Modesto Bee she was not pregnant when Laci went missing. Defense sources said the woman could not have been mistaken for Laci Peterson by potential witnesses interviewed in the investigation.

Prosecutors filed the wiretap documents late Friday in an apparent attempt to explain that they had inadvertently intercepted telephone conversations Peterson had with his attorney and investigator.

Because monitoring attorney-

client and investigator-client discussions is illegal, prosecutors wrote that they immediately stopped listening in most cases and did not learn anything "substantive."

The attorney, Kirk McAllister, called the eavesdropping "worse than underhanded" and vowed to "pursue this fully and vigorously."

He said Peterson's defense team will review the documents this weekend and consider asking the Superior Court to throw out double-murder charges against Scott Peterson.

Peterson, 30, is charged with murder in the deaths of his wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner. She was eight months pregnant when family members reported her missing from the couple's Modesto home on Christmas Eve.

The wiretap documents state that a judge referred to Peterson as a suspect, though police insisted that he was not a suspect -- nor had he been ruled out -- before his arrest April 18.

Stanislaus County Superior Court has sealed the original wiretap recordings, and a district attorney's investigator has copies.

But prosecutors in District Attorney James Brazelton's office say they have not listened to them, preferring to have the court sanction their release to the prosecution and defense. Otherwise, the recordings should be kept secret, prosecutors argue.

Judge Al Girolami is set to take up the matter Tuesday.

On Jan. 20, while tapping Peterson's cellular phone, investigators heard him tell Frey about his private investigator and say that a tabloid newspaper also had tried to hire the investigator, according to the documents.

Authorities apparently disclosed the conversation to explain why they erroneously intercepted Peterson's discussions with the private investigator. They simply had not known before that he was working for Peterson's defense team, investigators wrote.

They also wrote that Peterson's mother, Jackie Peterson, offered to pay the private investigator and her son accepted. Authorities listened to that conversation as well.

On the autopsy details, one source close to the investigation said in addition to the missing head and feet, significant parts of Laci Peterson's torso were missing.

"There were no organs, no skin, nothing from the belly button up to the chest area," said a source familiar with the autopsy report, which a judge has sealed from public review.

Two forensic experts, however -- without having seen the autopsy -- offered differing opinions on whether the body might have been mutilated before being dumped in the San Francisco Bay.

"The absence of parts of [Laci Peterson's] body says to me it was dismembered before being placed in the water," said Dr. Michael Baden. He is a New York forensic pathologist who worked on O.J. Simpson's defense team and helped Chandra Levy's family after the Modesto woman's remains were found in Washington, D.C.

But Dr. Gregory Schmunk, Santa Clara County coroner, said news of the headless torso "doesn't surprise me at all." He said it's perfectly natural for tidal activity, boat propellers and feeding animals to break apart bodies.

As for the Laci Peterson look-alike, two people who insist they saw the pregnant Laci Peterson walking her dog after 9:30 a.m. Christmas Eve now have a reason to believe they are right after Mark Geragos, Peterson's lead attorney, said the neighborhood woman who resembles Laci Peterson "debunks [the prosecution's] whole theory."

The woman, who has since moved, has a golden retriever named McKenzie -- the same breed and name as the Petersons' dog.

But the woman, who asked not to be identified, said she is sure she did not walk her dog on Christmas Eve because her husband's two sons were at their home preparing to go shopping that day.

"I'm 99.9% sure I was not walking that day," said the woman, who is a prosecutor in another county.

She said she was no longer pregnant in December, suggesting that the woman walking on Christmas Eve most likely was Laci Peterson.

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Week's bay search in Peterson slaying ends Authorities refuse to talk about what they were looking for

Week's bay search in Peterson slaying ends Authorities refuse to talk about what they were looking for

Henry K. Lee, Chronicle Staff Writer Saturday, May 24, 2003

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Richmond -- Divers hunting for more evidence in the slaying of Laci Peterson and her unborn child wrapped up their weeklong search of San Francisco Bay on Friday.

The divers, assisted by high-tech sonar devices, had been scouring a section of the bay off Richmond since May 16. Authorities declined to say what they were looking for in the murky waters or whether they had found anything that would bolster their case against Peterson's husband, Scott Peterson.

"Barring unexpected developments, the search of the bay will not be conducted over the Memorial Day weekend," Stanislaus County District Attorney Jim Brazelton, whose office is prosecuting Scott Peterson, said in a statement Friday. "Police may return to the bay at a future date."

The searchers included dive teams from the Marin County and Contra Costa County sheriff's departments, Modesto police and the U.S. Coast Guard.

The search area was not far from where the decomposed bodies of Laci Peterson, 27, and her unborn son washed ashore last month near Point Isabel in Richmond. Published reports have said that not all of Peterson's remains were found, and that her body may have been wrapped in plastic and weighted with heavy material.

Scott Peterson was charged last month with two counts of murder and could face the death penalty if convicted. He told police he had gone on a fishing trip off the Berkeley Marina on Christmas Eve, the day his pregnant wife was reported missing.

The 30-year-old fertilizer salesman has pleaded not guilty and remains jailed without bail.

The end of the search came as the legal team defending Scott Peterson indicated it had found an unidentified woman whom defense attorney Mark Geragos had said could shed light on the case.

Reports have surfaced that defense attorneys are trying to build a case suggesting that Laci Peterson may have been abducted from her Modesto neighborhood by someone other than her husband. The defense team is reportedly looking for a tan van seen near the Petersons' home on Christmas Eve.

Geragos and prosecutors have declined to comment publicly about the theories.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Lawyers push for Peterson records

Posted on Sun, May. 25, 2003

Lawyers push for Peterson records

By Brian Anderson
CONTRA COSTA TIMES

Lawyers for the Contra Costa Times and two other newspapers will argue Tuesday that search warrant information relating to the arrest of Scott Lee Peterson should be released to the public.

Peterson was arrested April 18 and charged with killing his wife, Laci Peterson, and the couple's unborn son. The woman, who was eight months pregnant, vanished Dec. 23 or 24.

In the days and weeks after Laci Peterson was reported missing, investigators served a series of search warrants on a warehouse, boat, truck and trailer that Peterson used. A Stanislaus County judge also allowed police to examine phone records and the Peterson home, where officials believed Laci Peterson was killed, court records showed.

Attorneys for the Times, San Jose Mercury News and the Modesto Bee have said in court papers that there is a compelling public interest in the case that should dictate disclosure of the documents.

But lawyers on both sides of the criminal case have fought newspaper requests to release eight returned search warrants, an arrest warrant and affidavits supporting the documents. Publicity surrounding the case could hurt a continuing investigation as well as Peterson's right to a fair trial, prosecutors and defense lawyers have argued.

On June 3, Judge Roger Beauchesne will decide whether another series of search and arrest warrants relating to the Peterson case should be unsealed.

Three days later, Judge Al Girolami will hear a motion brought on behalf of reporters whose conversations over certain telephone lines relating to the Peterson investigation might have been recorded.

Officials with the district attorney's office mailed out notices earlier this month to reporters at multiple news organizations stating that their calls might have been intercepted. Conversations Scott Peterson had with his lawyers also were intercepted, officials said.

---------------------------------------------------------

Scott Peterson's Parents Convinced Son Innocent

AMERICAN MORNING

Scott Peterson's Parents Convinced Son Innocent

Aired May 23, 2003 - 08:07 ET

THIS IS A RUSH TRANSCRIPT. THIS COPY MAY NOT BE IN ITS FINAL FORM AND MAY BE UPDATED.

BILL HEMMER, CNN ANCHOR: Heidi, Scott Peterson's parents are convinced their son is innocent and they want the world to know about it. Peterson is accused of murdering his wife Laci and their unborn son. In the new issue of "People" magazine just on stands today, Scott's parents, Jackie and Lee Peterson, say their son is not the monster the media has made him out to be.

So, why, then, the preemptive P.R. strike?

Anne Marie O'Neill, senior editor for "People," is here to tell more about the Peterson interview.

Good morning to you.

ANNE MARIE O'NEILL, SENIOR EDITOR, "PEOPLE" MAGAZINE: Hi.

HEMMER: Their only son of Jackie and Lee.

Why did they agree to talk?

O'NEILL: I think they're doing what any loving parents would do. They think their son is innocent. He's really being given a bad rap in the press, rightly or wrongly we won't know until the trial. But they're basically coming out and trying to say that he really was a good husband and father.

HEMMER: What you will find in this issue of "People" is a lot of pictures Scott as a kid. You say these strike you. Why?

O'NEILL: I think it's really striking to look at Scott growing up and to just see a really normal boy, from a very happy family. And obviously that's why the pictures are out there, from the parents' point of view. But, you know, it really does portray, you know, incredible normality in his upbringing. You look at it and you think, well, OK, could this guy kill his wife?

HEMMER: Mark Geragos is the attorney right now. We know he's very media savvy. He's been here on CNN many, many times. There he is in video.

Is he training the parents right now on how to address reporters like yourself?

O'NEILL: I would suggest he is. You know, I don't know. I haven't been witness to any of that. But I'd suggest he is because, you know, as you said, he's really media savvy. He knows the questions we're going to ask. He knows the answers he wants out there.

HEMMER: What is his, what is he basing this theory about a satanic cult? Where does he get this information and what is the facts that he believes could support such a theory?

O'NEILL: What he believes and what he is floating out there is this theory of the brown van that was on the street before Laci Peterson disappeared. There is a woman who he says he has who claims she was almost abducted by the guys in the brown van. And the other piece of evidence that he has come up with is that Laci Peterson and another woman who was abducted more than a year ago, a woman by the name of Hernandez, both disappeared on what he says are high holy days in the satanic church.

HEMMER: So he's done his research?

O'NEILL: He's done his research, yes.

HEMMER: Even though it sounds a bit farfetched, would you not agree?

O'NEILL: Yes, oh, well, I mean, you know, believe him or not, people are listening.

HEMMER: Let's talk about the suit, the clean shaven Scott Peterson that we now see right now in court.

Did the parents address the possibility, if he is found guilty, he could pay for this crime with his life? Have they thought about that yet?

O'NEILL: I think they've probably thought a lot about that and I think that's part of what's motivating them to get out there and talk.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------

For further indepth info on May 27th hearing, Press Release

(Excerpt) Read more at fresnobee.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: lacipeterson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-249 next last
To: RGSpincich
"But if you act fast it can be a Semper Paratus Free Zone. "

May I second that motion? It would be even more enjoyable to have FR be a cold hearted, creep free zone.

61 posted on 05/25/2003 10:31:24 AM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
"Anti-death penalty forces are protesting, arguing that the firing squad amounts to cruel and unusual punishment. And the prison is bracing for large crowds of protesters."

How illogical. I suppose that what they did to earn this punishment is NOT cruel and unusual punishment? It suits me just fine. Too bad the "protestors" can't go with them ... . Or why don't the "protestors" pay for them to remainin prison for the rest of their life instead of burdening EVERY taxpayer.

62 posted on 05/25/2003 10:35:53 AM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
I just can't imagine Scott NOT being guilty...except when I try to imagine him hacking apart someone his wife. THAT is very very hard to picture. I suppose this is just a failure of imagination on my part. There's no doubt in my mind that he was amoral enough to murder her for money...with substantial premeditation...but to butcher her? Gah.

Gonna get just a bit graphic here:

I also think they're going to have to have SOME kind of crime scene evidence, something a lot more substantial . Could someone do a bloody butchering job like this and not leave any blood anywhere???? I'm trying to imagine it. When we lived in Turkey several of my husband's shop buddies took him on a wild boar hunt. They brought back this 200 pound wild boar and hung it on MY BACK PORCH and butchered it. (MY objections, and my Turkish maid's, didn't faze any of them--they had had that much beer. UGH!)

Oh, the mess. They tried to be neat. They used sheet plastic and buckets, and they weren't in any kind of special hurry, and I was doing constant, sober, quality control on them. But it was just a very bloody activity. That was with a half dozen guys working together to try to convince me to let them live. (I was in real danger of losing my wonderful Muslim maid over this thing they did.)

This is where I bog down on my conviction of his guilt. If she was cut apart, not merely smothered and dumped, it happened somewhere. You just don't keep a mess like that would generate inside a tarp and sheet plastic. I sincerely doubt we could have cleaned my back porch up so completely that there'd be no physical evidence. I can tell you from that experience with that stupid stinky boar corpse that there is far more blood inside a body that big than seems physically possible.

(By the way: wild boar is NOT the pork you're used to. I suppose one could develop a taste for it, but I didn't. And oh, man, did that thing STINK! I don't know how those guys could put aside the stink to cut it up, or eat the meat afterward without remembering that sick-wet-dog smell.)
63 posted on 05/25/2003 10:36:59 AM PDT by ChemistCat (Disney won't see another cent of our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: justshe
"I cannot understand how attacking her character will somehow negate the impact of those tapes. "

Next you'll be hearing that Scott was the innocent victim of Amber. Fat chance. Birds of a feather flock together.

64 posted on 05/25/2003 10:37:59 AM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: Brandon
The thing is, it's easy enough to throw such evidence out before the jury sees it. (Or should be...we do seem to have some massive leaks on all sides of this case, enabling people like us to try the case ourselves before the jury is even seated!)
65 posted on 05/25/2003 10:39:17 AM PDT by ChemistCat (Disney won't see another cent of our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: justshe
The rumor is that Scott was seeing a COUPLE of women at the SAME time. This should be interesting and also fire Amber up MORE in her testimony. I wouldn't be surprised if Amber had genuine affection for Scott. Considering her background, he'd appear to be a knight in shinning armour.
66 posted on 05/25/2003 10:41:10 AM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: justshe
The rumor is that Scott was seeing a COUPLE of women at the SAME time. This should be interesting and also fire Amber up MORE in her testimony. I wouldn't be surprised if Amber had genuine affection for Scott. Considering her background, (stripper, prostitute, er massage therapist) he'd appear to be a knight in shinning armour.
67 posted on 05/25/2003 10:41:57 AM PDT by nmh
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 56 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Hang on there...I get professional massages as often as I can afford them, and the people who do them are honest skilled businesspeople, not prostitutes. I'm sure there are prostitutes who use a massage business as a front for what they really do. The place where I go has many safeguards in place to ensure that customers who might come in with the assumption you are making go away disappointed, as they deserve to be, and people like me who go in for relief of muscle pain and spasms get ONLY that. They respect my modesty, too, just as they respect the need for caution in the places where wire and pins hold me together.

I'm not saying anything about Amber Frey here...just wanted to make the point that massage therapist does NOT equal prostitute.
68 posted on 05/25/2003 10:47:26 AM PDT by ChemistCat (Disney won't see another cent of our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Are you confusing "masseuse" with "massage therapists"?

Massage therapists, in MANY areas, work for HMO's, hospitals, and in private practice with referrals from doctors. They are instrumental in assisting with injury rehab and pain management.

Isn't your equating her job with that of a prostitute a bit hasty?
69 posted on 05/25/2003 11:05:54 AM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: nmh
Anti-death penalty forces are protesting, arguing that the firing squad amounts to cruel and unusual punishment. And the prison is bracing for large crowds of protesters.

Maybe they should have both of them stand in the crowd when they are executed.

70 posted on 05/25/2003 11:06:07 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

Comment #71 Removed by Moderator

To: runningbear
by law they have to notify those whose conversations were intercepted, and notify them.

They go through the motions.

72 posted on 05/25/2003 12:51:08 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: onyx
'Geragos is trying his BEST CASE, putting on his BEST DEFENSE right now, in the media. "

I heard this weekend that it's possible Peterson was seeing at least two other women besides Frey. I'm wondering if he ever shared that bit of information with his lawyer. If it's true, it's another nail in his coffin. He hasn't been honest from the beginning. This is just another example of his deceitfulness, and it won't set well with any jury.

73 posted on 05/25/2003 12:52:01 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: spectre
"Gera-gross has told us he has found this woman who will clear Scott. "

I heard on Fox News this past week that this woman has had mental problems. Of course that doesn't surprise any of us I'm sure.

74 posted on 05/25/2003 12:56:02 PM PDT by mass55th
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: spectre
So, do we all fake amnesia? Or should we hold Mark's feet to the fire and demand he put up or shut up?

Mark is just doing his job. He isn't going to win, but he might get Scott a second degree.

75 posted on 05/25/2003 12:56:20 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: mass55th
I agree that all the circumstantial evidence looks 100% damning, but we do need to figure out how he cut her apart without leaving physical evidence of doing so. Where did he do that? If a boat prop did it then it's not a problem. It doesn't seem that is the case, though.
76 posted on 05/25/2003 12:57:10 PM PDT by ChemistCat (Disney won't see another cent of our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: The Other Harry
Can you figure out how this can be second degree???

GOSH, what a Clintonesque world this is. How you can bargain red into green? Words don't mean what they mean anymore. If this wasn't premeditated, NOTHING is.
77 posted on 05/25/2003 12:58:30 PM PDT by ChemistCat (Disney won't see another cent of our money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: ChemistCat
Can you figure out how this can be second degree???

I don't understand the laws. You or somebody else posted a message saying that the fact that Conner was involved would by definition make it first degree. Maybe so.

I tend to think of second degree as an act of passion which lacks premeditation. If that is true, I think Geragos might be able to get that.

78 posted on 05/25/2003 1:12:07 PM PDT by The Other Harry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 77 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Why do you suppose that idiots like Dan Abrhams and Rita Cosby report what the defense says without stipulating that Geargos is a slimey lying POS?

Rather, they, and all who report on this event for that matter, report what the defense team says with the same level credence that they give to what the police and the D.A.'s office put out.

79 posted on 05/25/2003 1:13:19 PM PDT by hole_n_one
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
It depends on the judge, but the defense can make a great argument to have some things tossed out, but probably not the charges themselves.

Say for example, Scott tells his attorney where an item is that the police are trying to find. It could be a link in a continuing chain to bust him.

Scott may not even know the police are looking for it, but... just say that Scott mentions that he needs to run back to Jiffy Pawn Shop to sell more jewelry to raise money. The police head to Jiffy... find some of Laci's jewelry, and it has blood on it.

It strengthens their case, but it can't be used. As well as the testimony of the store clerk who talked to Scott as he pawned it off.

80 posted on 05/25/2003 1:20:04 PM PDT by dogbyte12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 241-249 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson