Skip to comments.
Britain finds Iraq's 'smoking gun': a top-secret missile
The Sunday Telegraph (U.K.) ^
| 05/25/03
| Con Coughlin
Posted on 05/24/2003 4:31:22 PM PDT by Pokey78
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
To: Former Proud Canadian
I've read that special forces captured the Scud "launch box" region in western Iraq, but I've not seen anywhere that they captured a single Scud.
41
posted on
05/24/2003 6:15:52 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: Dog Gone
You know, the article doesn't claim it's a "WMD". Just that it's a 'smoking gun'. You know the difference, right?
To: Dr. Frank
No, tell me the difference. We already knew that Iraq had missiles and other weapons in violation of the UN restrictions.
So explain to me how this is the "smoking gun". Thanks.
43
posted on
05/24/2003 6:28:24 PM PDT
by
Dog Gone
To: cgk
Well, if Turkey had lot us use their country as northern base they would never have gotten into Syria, but the Turks had to screw us over.
To: JoeSchem
"While important, it's not a WMD, and not even evidence of a plan to build a WMD. It's a plan to build a missile with an illegal range."
Just what was Saddam going to deliver with these long-range missiles? Krispy Kremes?
Thank you!
45
posted on
05/24/2003 6:29:21 PM PDT
by
Jorge
To: Sonny M
"As for the SCUDS, they launched a SCUD into Kuwait during the war, if you remember, there were causalties, it hit a shopping Mall. The information minister denied it was fired from iraq and didn't know how it got into the mall (not joking, I'm serious)."
Wasn't a Scud that hit that mall..... it was a chinese silkworm missle. I think the scud that was fired at Kuwait landed without caualties of any sort.
46
posted on
05/24/2003 7:33:15 PM PDT
by
bart99
To: Pokey78
Interesting ............
47
posted on
05/24/2003 7:38:23 PM PDT
by
Robert A Cook PE
(I support FR monthly; and ABBCNNBCBS (continue to) Lie!)
To: All
What interests me is the numbers of trailor trucks that went into Syria a few weeks before the war.... AND.... still..... those three IRAQI ships that went into the Arabian Sea and just cicled in the middle somewhere maintaining radio silence. Initial reports were that we were afraid to do anything with the ships for fear they conained bio and chem stuff and if one sank it was cause a worldwide ecological disaster. But I still haven't heard what has happened with those ships.
48
posted on
05/24/2003 7:38:41 PM PDT
by
bart99
To: Final Authority
We should have given Iraq more time to build a deliver a smoking gun. That would explain the sense of urgency Tony Blair conveyed. Just a matter of time.
49
posted on
05/24/2003 7:41:12 PM PDT
by
RightWhale
(Theorems link concepts; proofs establish links)
To: RightWhale
I do believe that W has something up his sleeve on WMD.
Bits of tantalizing anecdotal evidence (the chemical trucks, etc) have come to light. There are hundreds of our
folks out looking and beaucoup Iraqis who should know are in captivity. Not a whisper of publicity. I would love for W to drop the WMD findings at Evian this weekend and invite the frogs to eat merde.
50
posted on
05/24/2003 8:15:02 PM PDT
by
basque69
To: Pokey78
This was just a part of Saddam's lunar program of sending a terrorist into orbit of the moon and landing on Mars. Not a weapon to kill. He was wanting Terroranots!
51
posted on
05/24/2003 8:20:09 PM PDT
by
RetiredArmy
(We'll put a boot in your ass, it's the American Way! Toby Keith)
To: Pokey78; Dog Gone
#1. "Britain finds Iraq's smoking gun': a top-secret missile project" JOLLY GOOD SHOW!!!!:-)
52
posted on
05/24/2003 9:22:35 PM PDT
by
Defender2
(Defending Our Bill of Rights, Our Constitution, Our Country and Our Freedom!!!!)
To: Pokey78
Good find Bump Pokey!
53
posted on
05/24/2003 9:30:55 PM PDT
by
JustPiper
(Follow Me...I'm the Pied...)
To: Pokey78
"We had finished the research stage and entered the development stage," 'Entered ' being the key word for the naysayers to minimize the importance of this. 'Manufacture is a whole other game. What was developed? Any materials found besides verbal or even paper?
54
posted on
05/24/2003 9:34:07 PM PDT
by
JustPiper
(Follow Me...I'm the Pied...)
To: Pokey78
This won't satisfy the left who is using this as a political weapon of mass destruction against the President. They won't care that it was capable of hitting Israel, that is for sure.
I for one, firmly believe Saddam had WMD in Iraq. Where they are now, I don't know, but they existed. He had plenty of time to hide and or dismantle them while we fiddled around with the UN. Perhaps that was the point of the clamor for the UN approval from our dear "friends." Some would want him to have time to get rid of the evidence.
55
posted on
05/24/2003 9:40:47 PM PDT
by
ladyinred
(Freedom isn't free, remember our fallen heroes)
To: Dog Gone
We already knew that Iraq had missiles and other weapons in violation of the UN restrictions. So explain to me how this is the "smoking gun". Whether a gun is "smoking" doesn't depend on whether we "already knew it was smoking". A gun is either "smoking" (=displaying evidence of a Crime) or not. This is such a case: evidence of violations of UN rules. You might say "but we already knew that".
I agree. Tell it to The French Of The World. When you do so, you can point out that we've found (yet another) "smoking gun". Best,
To: MizSterious; Pokey78; *Bush Doctrine Unfold; *war_list; W.O.T.; seamole; Lion's Cub; ...
Thanks for the ping!
Pokey thanks for the post!
Another piece of the puzzle now seems to be in place!
More yet to be found!
Bush Doctrine Unfolds :
To find all articles tagged or indexed using Bush Doctrine Unfold , click below: |
|
click here >>> |
Bush Doctrine Unfold |
<<< click here |
|
(To view all FR Bump Lists, click here) |
57
posted on
05/24/2003 11:46:47 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Iran will feel the heat from our Iraq victory!)
To: Dog Gone
David Kay, the former United Nations weapons inspector responsible for dismantling Iraq's nuclear weapons programme in the 1990s, said the British discovery proved that Saddam had no intention of complying with UN requirements. To me, this is the bigge!
58
posted on
05/24/2003 11:48:50 PM PDT
by
Ernest_at_the_Beach
(Iran will feel the heat from our Iraq victory!)
To: Sonny M
You are mistaken. There were no Scuds fired by Iraq at Kuwait during the recent "war". The Iraqis fired some smaller, shorter ranged missiles: these missiles were not Scuds. Please get your facts right.
To: Sonny M
That wasn't a Scud. Please acquaint yourself with the proper terminology. In spite of what CNN or Fox News may think, not every missile launched by Iraq is a "Scud".
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-92 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson