Posted on 05/24/2003 3:40:40 PM PDT by Kwilliams
We all do stupid things, but we all don't write about them in a column. I am one of the few who openly wrote about a stupid thing I did. And, it seems, everyone takes notice when you make a mistake, considering the dozens of letters I have received regarding this, and even Bill Press brought it up when I appeared on "Buchanan and Press" last week. I usually don't talk or write about myself, but my conscience compels me to do so now.
In my column of April 26, I wrote, "As I was walking through Barnes and Noble earlier this week, I noticed a book by Nation columnist Eric Alterman, titled 'What Liberal Media?' I picked it up but quickly put it back down."
In my outlook, I simply could not imagine any argument against a liberal media, as I wrote, "I'm sure Mr. Alterman is very sharp and intelligent, but I can't imagine anything refuting media bias, considering that organizations like the Media Research Center and many authors like Bernard Goldberg have documented this as a fact."
But, of course, Mr. Alterman deals with the books by Ann Coulter and Bernard Goldberg, and the message coming out of the Media Research Center.
"Closed-minded" – that was my view, as I put the book back on the shelf. I continued to stroll through the bookstore and thought about all the research I had done, all the consideration I had made and every article I had written on the subject. Increasingly, in my mind, a logical and fact-based book refuting the claim to a liberal media and describing the media as "conservative" didn't seem possible.
Although I am not complaining, what makes this situation different is that I wrote about it and one liberal reader had a field-day rallying all his buddies into letting me know of my problems. After that, the stream of mail kicked into high-gear.
One nameless reader informed me that I'm a "mullet wearing hick" along with some insightful four-letter words. Another reader wrote, "You are obviously not interested in truth, only being the next Limbaugh. That's sad." One fan of mine commented, "Try reading the book before you comment. Nice to know you're an idiot. Get a life you racist, homophobic, ignorant slug!"
David Lawson informed, "If you were in my English class, you would either receive a failing grade or else be required to rewrite your essay due to poor scholarship.
Ken Chambers, from Texas, opined, "If you want to be interesting and informative, you can't just parrot the party line. You need to expand your horizons, Kyle, or you'll be just another narrow-minded blowhard. And there's an over-supply of those right now."
I partly agree with Mr. Chambers. I have always viewed myself as an open-minded person – and I still do. Last week, out of responsibility and curiosity, I bought Eric Alterman's book and read it. It's a very interesting read and I learned more about a liberal's viewpoint on the news media.
"What Liberal Media?" fills the voice for liberals in the raging debate of the biases of the American news media. However, this is not a review of Mr. Alterman's book. This is an acknowledgement of having a closed mind on the media bias issue. Eventually, I did buy this book, I did read it, but my opinion of the bias of the news media hasn't changed.
That's the way I have always looked at politics: I approach both sides of the argument, conduct my own research, and arrive at my own conclusions. Sometimes I change my stances on issues, other times I don't. From a very early age, I have always had a hard time accepting what people say as truth. The arena of politics is filled with rhetoric, backstabbing, spin and boldfaced lying. Therefore, I have always questioned politicians on both sides of the aisle and anywhere in between.
Furthermore, anyone who reads my writings will realize that I am anything but a parrot of the party line. Whether or not I will register as a Republican in four years is still up in the air – both parties are taking us down a road to growing, massive government. Accepting perception as reality because it's expected that I do so has always been a problem for me, but hopefully it's one I'll continue to have on my back throughout my life.
There's no telling what I'll pick up at Barnes and Noble next.
Just VOTE GOP, and, by the way, the election is next year, 2004!
Name-calling and labeling are the great weapons of the far left. Always attempting to put conservatives on the defensive. How does one respond to charges of racism and homophobia? Any attempt to defend yourself is refuted. The democrats "own" the minorities and tell them how to vote. I don't like being told how to vote...I prefer to form my own opinions.
Regards, K. Williams, for withstanding the slings and arrows of those anxious to gain power over all.
What's the gist of said letter? I'm not registering with an LAT that wants anything more than a password. And I doubt that faking an address will get past the LAT. Obviously a tactic aimed at FR. I'm surprised its partners in crime the WP and the Baltimore RedSun didn't do this to those who want to hit their sites.
foreverfree
Well, I read that and I have to agree. LOL
Especially the Democratic "arena of politics."
C'mon and tell the truth. Who really writes your columns .... your mommy after she bakes some cookies for you?
"Furthermore, anyone who reads my writings will realize that I am anything but a parrot of the party line." -- Kwilliams
Well...not exactly. It's our problematic use of language that distinguishes the truth.
To a real left wing so-called liberal...the media seems awfully right wing. To a right winger...it seems pretty far left.
Let's call it what it is....the media is strongly democrat, in their voting patterns and the agenda they're promoting. Yes...there's a difference between a left wing liberal and a run of the mill democrat.
The answer is to NOT call the media Liberal...instead refer to them as the official mouthpiece of the democratic party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.