Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Laci Peterson look-alike 'debunks' mistaken identity
The Modesto Bee ^ | May 24, 2003, 06:24:24 AM PDT | John Cote' and Garth Stapely

Posted on 05/24/2003 8:06:32 AM PDT by runningbear

A Laci Peterson look-alike 'debunks' mistaken identity

Homer and Helen Maldonado say they saw Laci Peterson Dec. 24.

Laci Peterson look-alike 'debunks' mistaken identity

By JOHN COTÉ and GARTH STAPLEY
BEE STAFF WRITERS

Published: May 24, 2003, 06:24:24 AM PDT

Two people who insist they saw the pregnant Laci Peterson walking her dog after 9:30 a.m. Christmas Eve now have even stronger reason to believe they are right. A woman from the same neighborhood resembles Peterson, was pregnant last year and could have been mistaken for her.

But that woman had her baby in October and said she did not walk her dog that day. Scott Peterson, his wife's accused killer, said he last saw Laci at 9:30 a.m. Dec. 24 when he set out from their Modesto home on a fishing trip.

Prosecutors allege that Peterson killed his wife "on or about and between" Dec. 23 and 24, and have discounted reports from people who say they saw Laci Peterson after her husband contends he went fishing.

Mark Geragos, Peterson's lead attorney, said the woman who resembles Laci Peterson, but was no longer pregnant in December, "debunks their whole theory."

The woman, who has since moved from the La Loma neighborhood, has a golden retriever named McKenzie -- the same breed and name as the Petersons' dog.

She said she is sure about not walking her dog on Christmas Eve, because her husband's two sons were at their home to go shopping that day.

"I'm 99.9 percent sure I was not walking that day," said the woman, who asked not to be identified. She is a prosecutor in another county.

Scott Peterson has pleaded not guilty to two counts of murder in the deaths of his wife and their unborn son, Conner. Soon after taking Peterson's case, Geragos announced that he was launching an investigation to "find out who did this to Scott's wife and Scott's son."

The defense was searching for one woman in particular, but Geragos declined to say Friday if she had been found.

The woman who resembles Peterson said she has spoken to police and Modesto attorney Kirk McAllister, a member of the defense team.

Geragos said the woman's account supports the defense contention that police arrested the wrong person.

"It certainly would confirm my belief that Laci was abducted on the 24th and certainly debunks any leaks out there that this was someone else who was walking that morning."

Homer Maldonado, a 59-year-old commercial painter, said he saw Peterson between 9:45 and 10 a.m. Dec. 24, moments after he left the USA Gasoline station on Miller Avenue, about a half-mile south of the Peterson home at 523 Covena Ave.

"I slowed down and was taking a good look. What caught my eye was she was so pregnant," Maldonado said. "There's no question it was her."

Maldonado said he told police on Jan. 1 about the sighting as search teams fanned out from East La Loma Park. But an officer told him that search dogs indicated that Peterson went in another direction, Maldonado said. He said police never called him to follow up.

A bloodhound indicated that she left her home in a vehicle, not on foot, the dog's handler said Dec. 30.

Maldonado and his wife, Helen, said they left their Phoenix Avenue home at about 9:30 a.m. Dec. 24, dropped off a Christmas gift and then went for gas.

They said they saw a yellowish-tan van with dull paint at an adjacent pump. The van reeked of cigarette smoke, the Maldonados said.

"They weren't getting gas. They were just there," Homer Maldonado said.

According to Maldonado, a man came out of the gas station's store and a male voice from the van asked if the man had "got the cigs."

Maldonado said he saw Peterson about a block away from the gas station, walking in front of 211 Covena Ave.

Vivian Mitchell, who lives on Buena Vista Avenue roughly 10 blocks from the Peterson home and about three-quarters of a mile from the Maldonado sighting, has told police that she saw Peterson walk by between 10 and 10:30 a.m. Dec. 24.

"How can you duplicate a woman that looked like her?" Mitchell, 79, said. "She was so magnetic. She was so pretty."

She called police, and got no call back for several weeks.

Mitchell and her husband, Bill, said they were sure it was Dec. 24, partially because the sun had come out after several days of damp and foggy weather.

But data at the Western Regional Climate Center show fairly clear weather in Modesto on Dec. 22 and 23, with mist setting in about 6 p.m. Dec. 23 and lasting at least through Christmas.

Chief Deputy District Attorney John Goold said he could not explain, without discussing other evidence, why authorities discounted the witnesses' statements.

"Police were very seriously looking at whatever seemed credible," he said. "Modesto's a big town. I imagine there was more than one pregnant woman in it."

---------------------------------------------------------

Wiretap documents filed

Wiretap documents filed

By GARTH STAPLEY and JOHN COTÉ

BEE STAFF WRITERS

Published: May 24, 2003, 06:26:13 AM PDT

Scott Peterson talked with his girlfriend four weeks after his pregnant wife was reported missing, according to court documents filed late Friday.

The wiretap documents reveal that he called Amber Frey and discussed his hiring of a private investigator. The call came late at night on Jan. 20, almost a month after Frey had gone to police to tell them about her affair with Peterson, and four days before she went public.

The documents from prosecutors also reveal that authorities intercepted 69 calls between Peterson and his Modesto attorney, and two calls between Peterson and his private investigator. The prosecutors said they inadvertently monitored some of those conversations.

Because monitoring attorney-client and investigator-client discussions is illegal, prosecutors wrote that they immediately stopped listening in most cases and did not learn anything "substantive."

The attorney, Kirk McAllister, called the eavesdropping "worse than underhanded" and vowed to "pursue this fully and vigorously." He said Peterson's defense team will review the documents this weekend and consider asking the Superior Court to throw out double-murder charges against Peterson.

The 30-year-old is charged with murder in the deaths of his wife, Laci, and their unborn son, Conner. She was eight months pregnant when family members reported her missing from her Modesto home Christmas Eve.

The wiretap documents state that a judge referred to Peterson as a suspect, though police insisted that he was not a suspect -- nor had he been ruled out -- before his arrest April 18.

Stanislaus County Superior Court has sealed the original wiretap recordings, and a district attorney's investigator has copies.

But prosecutors in District Attorney James Brazelton's office say they have not listened to them, preferring to have the court sanction their release to the prosecution and defense. Otherwise, the recordings should be kept secret, prosecutors argue.

Judge Al Girolami is scheduled to take up the matter Tuesday morning.

On Jan. 20, while tapping Peterson's cell phone, investigators heard him tell Frey about his private investigator, and say that a tabloid newspaper also had tried to hire the investigator, according to the documents.

Authorities apparently disclosed the conversation to explain why they erroneously intercepted Peterson's discussions with the private investigator. They simply had not known before that he was working for Peterson's defense team, investigators wrote.

They also wrote that Peterson's mother, Jackie Peterson, offered to pay the private investigator and her son accepted. Authorities listened to that conversation as well.

Wiretapping laws allow investigators to briefly spot-check conversations between clients and their lawyers from time to time. But Superior Court Judge Wray Ladine "was not comfortable with the idea of any spot checks," federal task force agent Steven P. Jacobson wrote in an affidavit filed Friday.

"Judge Ladine said he felt monitoring or spot-checking any conversations between Scott Peterson and Kirk McAllister would be inappropriate and could cause problems," Jacobson wrote.

The newly filed documents state that investigators intercepted calls between Peterson and McAllister from Jan. 10 until Peterson's arrest, and monitored segments of only two of the 69 intercepted calls.

Agent Steve Hoek of the Stanislaus Drug Enforcement Agency once listened for 41 seconds before recognizing McAllister's voice, according to the documents.

---------------------------------------------------------

Laci's remains raise mutilation questions

Laci's remains raise mutilation questions

By GARTH STAPLEY and JOHN COTÉ
BEE STAFF WRITERS

Published: May 24, 2003, 06:26:13 AM PDT

EDITOR'S NOTE: This story contains graphic details that may be disturbing to some readers.

Laci Peterson's body was recovered without a head and feet, two separate sources close to the double-murder investigation said Friday.

One source added that significant parts of the torso were missing as well.

"There were no organs, no skin, nothing from the belly button up to the chest area," said a source familiar with the autopsy report, which a judge has sealed from public review.

Two forensic experts, however -- without having seen the autopsy -- offered differing opinions on whether the body might have been mutilated before being dumped in San Francisco Bay.

The body of Peterson, 27, and her unborn son were found along the bay's eastern shore in mid-April, about four months after the then-pregnant woman had gone missing from her Modesto home.

Divers, who had been searching the bay for evidence the last eight days, quit early Friday afternoon and were not expected to resume before Tuesday.

Authorities have said they will seek the death penalty against Scott Peterson, 30. He has been charged with two counts of murder in the deaths of his wife and their unborn son, Conner.

"The absence of parts of (Laci Peterson's) body says to me it was dismembered before being placed in the water," said Dr. Michael Baden. He is a New York forensic pathologist who worked on O.J. Simpson's defense team and helped Chandra Levy's family after the Modesto woman's remains were found in Washington, D.C.

Killers sometimes dismember bodies to make it easier to dispose of them, Baden said.

But Dr. Gregory Schmunk, Santa Clara County coroner, said news of the headless torso "doesn't surprise me at all." He said it is perfectly natural for tidal activity, boat propellers and feeding animals to break apart bodies.

"This is the normal type of thing we see," Schmunk said.

Baden disagreed, saying extremities are known to separate in water -- but not in four months.

In the past two weeks, he has presided over six autopsies of people who drowned or were killed in the winter, and whose bodies floated up as spring temperatures produce more decomposition gases. "None of them was dismembered," he said.

"Usually (a body) stays together pretty good," Baden continued, adding that marine animals normally do not chew through tough ligaments holding bones together. "After a while (separation occurs), yes, but not after four months -- not even after four years."

Schmunk said speculation of mutilation is not warranted until borne out by the autopsy report.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

Keeping track of McAllister's other pending case, not of Peterson

Arraignment postponed in dairy deaths

SNIP IT

The judge commented: "It doesn't seem you're moving along with any great speed."

Nunes' attorney, Michael Fagalde of Merced, said the appeal "blindsided" him. "We found out about it late (Thursday) afternoon," he said.

Faria's attorney, Kirk McCallister of Modesto, agreed to the delay because "there may be issues involved in this beyond what Mr. Falgalde and I have researched."

The grand jury's 500-page report alleged that Alatorre and Araiza had not been properly trained to deal with methane gas, did not have proper equipment and that the air in the pipe had not been tested.

The California Occupational Safety and Health administration has fined the dairy $126,650, in a decision the dairy is appealing.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

A case of murder got conviction in Mexico, scaughty, Mexico would of convicted ya? ;o)

http://www.modbee.com/local/story/6830914p-7768407c.html">Suspect in '98 killing is convicted in Mexico

excerpted:

Suspect in '98 killing is convicted in Mexico

By DARYL FARNSWORTH
BEE STAFF WRITER

Published: May 24, 2003, 06:26:21 AM PDT

A suspect in a 1998 Stanislaus County murder has been convicted of the crime in Mexico, the Sheriff's Department reported Friday.

Oscar Sanchez Mata, 28, was convicted May 18 of first-degree murder and received a 20-year prison sentence, Detective Mark Copeland said. Mata is imprisoned in Jalisco.

The Mexican government put Mata on trial under a law that allows prosecution of Mexicans accused of crimes against fellow citizens in other countries.

The killing occurred July 28, 1998, at a dairy on Crow Road between Oakdale and Waterford. Twenty-six-year-old Armando Munoz died from a gunshot wound to the head.

Munoz had been attending a barbecue at the dairy when he and his brother Cesear got into a fight with Mata and his brothers Ernesto and Celestino, investigators said.

The Matas left, only to return 90 minutes later and start fighting again with Cesear Munoz.

When Armando Munoz tried to break up the fight, Oscar Mata shot him once in the head with a handgun, detectives said.

The Mata brothers fled. Mexican authorities caught Oscar and Ernesto in Celaya, Guanajuato, and prosecuted both.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(Excerpt) Read more at modbee.com ...


TOPICS: Activism/Chapters; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Extended News; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: lacipeterson; scottpeterson
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-331 next last
To: Devil_Anse
yeah, it brings ya back, and then to combat the spin....
61 posted on 05/24/2003 11:49:41 AM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
One thing to keep in mind is, if anyone did see Laci on the 24th, that still does not rule out the possibility that Scott murdered her. It would just mean that the police got the timeline a little wrong.

These so-called witnesses all say they saw Laci walking the dog along THE STREETS. So suppose she was "abducted" while walking along the street near where the witnesses "saw" her, then how come the dog showed up right on her street with a muddy leash? How much mud is there gonna be on sidewalks and other paved areas, even after rainy weather?
62 posted on 05/24/2003 11:51:07 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Me too Howlin!! Amazing how these types of people come out of the woodwork when high profile crimes happen. You nailed it. They want to be involved!! Maybe they think they can somehow collect a little reward money, or whatever the hell else these kooks think. These are the nitwits that infuriate me in these matters.
63 posted on 05/24/2003 11:51:33 AM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
And how exactly does someone pull into a van a pregnant woman who is attached by a leash to a large dog?

The leash wasn't cut. Presumably the loop on the leash was around Laci's wrist. Wouldn't she be dragging the dog, if they "snatched her into the van"? If they got the leash off her wrist (w/o being bitten by the dog) then slammed the van door shut after her, the dog would have been standing there right by the van as they sped off. I find it hard to believe the dog wouldn't have been injured.
64 posted on 05/24/2003 11:55:28 AM PDT by Devil_Anse
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: babygene
UH the article just said that the MPD DID check it out!!
65 posted on 05/24/2003 11:56:17 AM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: joyce11111
Maybe Scott is a member of that Cult. So both theories are right.
66 posted on 05/24/2003 12:06:22 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (RATS will use any means to denigrate George Bush's Victory.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
Do people NOT SEE the scam Geragos is trying to pull? First he knows of a young lady who can PROVE the Scott didn't kill Laci, However, he's busy investigating other "theories" including a Satanic Cult. The above is contradictory and yet NONE of the Press seem to pick up on it!! This makes me soooo mad. Truth is, the Defense are farting in the wind.
67 posted on 05/24/2003 12:08:28 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich
this is gross.... but a hatchet?

Rense.com

12) "He lopped it of with a hatchet!"

Reverse -

13) "Pappy!"

Reverse -

14) "They better find her Craig! Who are they lookin' at, who? Laci! They should find all of them at low tide."

Reverse - "You're a little piece of heaven. What does that mean? You're lookin' up over there."

15) "First Park, close to... Underwater! Don't give up! ...Berkeley."

Reverse - "They're dead! We found it in the water."

16) "Anchored in place." (Over top) "In the middle."

Reverse - "Bring me up through the bay."

17) "He put it there, roped to the fifth buoy. (over top) Beside the marker (buoy).

A snip it....

68 posted on 05/24/2003 12:13:56 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
and that witness who states, he was afraid of the leaping dog with her?....lol. Pregnant with an aging beautiful setter, and she was walking a dog, while pregnant, and he was afraid?....;o)

Brings back Vivian Mitchell et el, she was such the most beautiful young lady(summarizing it), and Bill was watching FOOTBALL, Christmas Eve?

Must of had too many hot totties! ;o)

69 posted on 05/24/2003 12:17:49 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: joyce11111
The Satanic Cult Theory falls flat on its' face period. A Satanic Cult would NOT have taken so much pains to hide the evidence. The only one really needing to hide the evidence of what was done was Snott Peterson. Anybody recall him telling Ted Rowlands "They don't have anything on me". A "normal" response to the question would have been, "I haven't done anything"!!.
70 posted on 05/24/2003 12:18:11 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Happy Memorial Day to you too Runningbear, and hope everyone has a wonderful weekend!
71 posted on 05/24/2003 12:18:15 PM PDT by brneyedgirl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Devil_Anse
and remember Laci decked a person when she was 17, as it wsa reported long ago on these threads.. So, she would of decked or fought off the perps IF abducted!....;o)
72 posted on 05/24/2003 12:19:23 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Because we know there will be more people who have not followed the case coming on the threads when the trial begins, this is an excellent resource for answering their questions.

GREAT job runningbear. We almost need that chronology posted on it's own thread...once the trial starts...so a single link can be given to those with questions.
73 posted on 05/24/2003 12:21:29 PM PDT by justshe
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
I think he is trying to get the trial moved to LA and I think he'll fail on that one. Besides, this Judge that he wants rid of would go with the case to wherever it's moved, if it's moved at all! I'm in B.C. and I know a lot about the case, who do they think they're kidding by moving it at all?? Everybody knows about it!!
74 posted on 05/24/2003 12:22:24 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: RGSpincich; Devil_Anse; pbear8
Do ya remember any of this statements? (lifted it off this site:)

"Resolution: I did a search on Yahoo and found out it was in Sonoma County, but then I noticed that the web PAGE about Still Water Cove, was on a web SITE for THE RADISSON HOTEL AT THE BERKELEY MARINA. The 'folks' say that additional remains have washed up near the sea wall there. LE, please bring a cadaver dog to that area.)

75 posted on 05/24/2003 12:26:56 PM PDT by runningbear (Lurkers beware, Freeping is public opinions based on facts, theories, and news online.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Dolphy
Well Snott was home long enough, to change his clothes, wash the clothes he was wearing, and mop the floor. THEN, he decides to "put his act" into gear once he thinks he has taken care of the "details". I agree with Howlin that the fact that he wouldn't allow the Police in the very first night is suspicious. Very suspicious. Marc Klass said he did EVERYTHING, he begged to take a polygraph test, had the Police looking everywhere inside and outside his house. Was on the phone to them EVERY single day. That's what a "normal" man who should out of his mind with grief would do. Assist NOT block the Police.
76 posted on 05/24/2003 12:32:21 PM PDT by Canadian Outrage (All us Western Canuks belong South)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Sounds like that was the bone they found after finding Laci's body. It's the right location.
It was tested and found not to be a human bone.
77 posted on 05/24/2003 12:37:37 PM PDT by RGSpincich
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies]

To: runningbear
Los Banos = The Bathroom

snicker.

78 posted on 05/24/2003 12:48:25 PM PDT by homeschool mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Howlin
True. Dateline ran a case last night that was very interesting, about a rabbi who came home to find his wife brutally battered to death, blood everywhere. He called 911. Their son happened to be an EMT and heard the broadcast of his parents address that night, responded to find his father calmly telling him everything would be alright. Son asked what about Mom, dad didn't say.

Bottom line, dad had hired someone to kill her because he was in love with another woman, and son noticed that dad had no blood on him at all, meaning he had gone no where near Mom to check and even see if she was still alive when he got home. There was a lot of other behaviour and such, but talk about circumstantial evience, this case was full of it, including the actual "hit" man finally confessing some 5 years later, but the problem was this guy was a habitual liar. First trial, son really wanted to learn the truth, he had doubts, couldn't really believe his dad could do such a thing--dad had nothing in his past, outstanding reputation, rabbi, etc. So, when the son testified, he gave direct, minimum aswers, especially because he did not want to be the one to sway the jury, he wanted to have absolute proof for everyone, if his father really was involved.

Dad testified, denied everything, of course, said the affair was true, did write letters to the woman, but she was not the love of his life, that although the woman tesified that she should trust him, that God closes one door and opens another, someday they would be together (this was weeks before the murder) he denied he ever said that. He said absolutely there would never be divorce, his was an affair, not love. Then the DA played a tape recording with him telling the lover how much he loved her, that he had never loved like this before...DA said that was as close as he had ever gotten someone with perjury before.

Son watched father testify and heard him talk about how he never touched his wife when he came home, he called 911, said that was all he could do for her. Son listened to rest, and heard him lie after lie, things son knew were lies.

Jury was out for 8 days, came back hung. New trial, son testifies, but now knows father is guilty. Testifies with direct emotion, looks father in the eye while testifing, father stares him down, son calls him on it while on the stand. Father found guilty, 8 years after murder.

Oh, one more thing, father hired hit man after murder to be "investigtor" in order to hide the payments he was making to him--and to top it off, he later performed the marriage ceremony for the hitman and his new bride in the same living room that the murder took place.

These guys are a piece of work.
79 posted on 05/24/2003 12:54:38 PM PDT by Rusty Roberts (RB and RG have memories like elephants, thankfully for those of us who read but post infrequently)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Howlin; veronica
I hate to get emotionally involved in this gawd-damned thread or, for that matter, in the Peterson case at all. Too many of the same useful idiots will defend Scott as they did Westerfield. (Some continue to defend Westerfield).

Geragos is trying HIS BEST CASE right now, in the media! Come trial time, he's finished.
80 posted on 05/24/2003 1:05:54 PM PDT by onyx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 321-331 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson