Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House OKs Ban on Forcing Kids' Medication
AP via Excite News ^ | May 21, 2003 | ELIZABETH WOLFE

Posted on 05/21/2003 12:15:13 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough

WASHINGTON (AP) - The House voted Wednesday to prohibit schools from making children with behavioral or mental problems take medication in order to attend class.

Under the bill, passed 425-1, states receiving federal education money must make sure schools do not coerce parents into medicating their children.

"School personnel may have good intentions, but parents should never be required to decide between their child's education and keeping them off potentially harmful drugs," said Rep. Max Burns, R-Ga., who sponsored the legislation.

In recent decades, more children have been diagnosed with attention deficit or hyperactivity disorders and prescribed drugs such as Ritalin or Adderall.

The prevalence of forced medication as a precondition for attending class has never been established. The bill, called the Child Medication Safety Act, provides for a congressional investigation into the use of psychotropic medication in schools.

Rep. Susan Davis, D-Calif., who voted against the bill, "believed it was a solution looking for a problem," said her spokesman, Aaron Hunter.

Several states have already moved to ban schools from requiring medication.

Mary Crosby, governmental affairs director at the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychology, called the bill unnecessary and thinks the issue could be better resolved at the local level. She condemned the practice but questioned the necessity of federal legislation until the extent of the problem becomes clearer.

Addressing concerns that such a law would stifle communication between schools and parents about a child's behavior or mental health, lawmakers added a provision that allows teachers to bring up any problems they observe.

==

On the Net:

Information on the bill, H.R. 1170, can be found at http://thomas.loc.gov/

American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychology: http://www.aacap.org


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: California; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: aacap; adderall; behavioral; drugs; education; illness; mental; psychotropic; ritalin; schools
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 05/21/2003 12:15:13 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Rep. Susan Davis, D-Calif., is the only one to vote against this bill. Any connection to Gray-Out Davis??????
2 posted on 05/21/2003 12:20:56 PM PDT by cuz_it_aint_their_money ("There is some good in this world, Mr. Frodo, and it's worth fighting for." - Samwise Gamgee)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Rep. Susan Davis, D-Calif., who voted against the bill, "believed it was a solution looking for a problem," said her spokesman, Aaron Hunter.

She believes pumping ridalin in kids is not a problem?

3 posted on 05/21/2003 12:22:38 PM PDT by smith288 (Why do liberals believe every ammendment is personal but the 2nd?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Its hard to believe in this day and age that anyone anywhere could force a parent to give a child medication for any reason. even vaccinations are not forced on kids if the family has a religious objection.of course there is always home schooling if you have the time or inclination to do so..
4 posted on 05/21/2003 12:23:27 PM PDT by Walnut
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cuz_it_aint_their_money
This must be a shock for Big Pharamacutical. I guess they're just gonna have to pony up to the bar with more bucks for lobbying.

My guess is that their 5 year forecasts are depending on ever-more drugging of Amerika's childen. They are not going to like this one damn bit.

5 posted on 05/21/2003 12:28:00 PM PDT by Buffalo Bob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
But...but...teachers won't have narcotic baby-sitters. They'll have to deal with real kids. Makes me wonder how the hell we managed before the drug companies started coining all these new diseases to go along with the "medicines" they invent, then have to try to figure out what to use them on...

I get disgusted when the commercials show someone smiling, etc., and throw out the name of a drug and tell you to "Ask your doctor if this drug is right for you", and never bother to mention what the heck the drug is for...

6 posted on 05/21/2003 12:31:41 PM PDT by trebb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb
this will get rejected by more reflective consideration by Senate MODERATES (read: Repubs scared of Dems like bunnies) in their more "deliberative" style to be reexamined in a few decades...
7 posted on 05/21/2003 12:34:20 PM PDT by epluribus_2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
"She condemned the practice but questioned the necessity of federal legislation until the extent of the problem becomes clearer."

Unfortunately, it had to come down to this with certain states mandating drugs to kids whether people wanted it or not. Maybe someone is finally listening.....(crossing fingers...toes....eyeballs.....)

8 posted on 05/21/2003 12:36:25 PM PDT by BossLady
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb
"I get disgusted when the commercials show someone smiling, etc., and throw out the name of a drug and tell you to "Ask your doctor if this drug is right for you", and never bother to mention what the heck the drug is for.."

Don't worry...congress is supposedly looking into to that, also. I think it was either Rush or Hannity who was talking about a Bill to prevent pharmaceutical companies from advertising on TV. While I understand your concerns in this paricular instance, I think the government is going nuts. If they do anything, get those damn lawyer ads off the TV.
9 posted on 05/21/2003 12:50:15 PM PDT by cwb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: BossLady
Hooray for the children and their parents. A friend took her child out of school after the teacher said he wiggled all the time and obviously had ADS. (He was getting all A's).

My son ground his teeth and the dentist said to put him on medication. I was young and talked with my aunt about it (she was a nurse). She didn't think it was a good idea as he was only 5 at the time. He had no problems in school or at home. He still grinds his teeth but gave up his nail biting. He graduated from Syracuse University with honors.

10 posted on 05/21/2003 12:52:00 PM PDT by Sacajaweau (God Bless Our Troops!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
"Addressing concerns that such a law would stifle communication between schools and parents about a child's behavior or mental health, lawmakers added a provision that allows teachers to bring up any problems they observe."

As mandated reporters for the state, teachers could still call CPS on parents when they think they know what's best for the kids. "Medical neglect" is already defined in federal regulations to mandate states to initiate termination of parental rights, so this bill is absolutely useless.

11 posted on 05/21/2003 1:06:30 PM PDT by dbreidenbach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dbreidenbach
The NEA will fight this tooth and nail. Kids "diagnosed" with ADD/ADHD/etc allow schools to claim FEDERAL funds for managing children with "disabilities." To the tune of hundreds of dollars per student, this equates to several teacher's salaries at large schools.

Follow the money.

12 posted on 05/21/2003 1:32:18 PM PDT by ImaGraftedBranch (Education starts in the home. Education stops in the public schools)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Halla-freepin-lueiah! About time somebody told these control freak school administrators where to stick their Ritalin.
13 posted on 05/21/2003 1:34:39 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: trebb
Makes me wonder how the hell we managed before the drug companies started coining all these new diseases to go along with the "medicines" they invent, then have to try to figure out what to use them on...

My latest favorite is the Lamisil pill to deal with the dreaded yellow fungus that lives under your toenails.

One wonders how mankind managed muddle through the ages in the face of such a perilous scourge.

14 posted on 05/21/2003 1:36:38 PM PDT by Bloody Sam Roberts (®)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
This is the first sensible piece of legislation that these POS'have passed in two years.
15 posted on 05/21/2003 2:13:36 PM PDT by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
Connecticut takes a different approach altogether, disallowing kids from taking their own OTC medications in school and requiring a physician's order to allow a school nurse to administer OTC medications like Tylenol ofr pain or headache. Here's an excerpt from a camp brochure explaining the policy:

Question: May unlicensed program staff administer are over-the-counter medication without the order of an authorized prescriber?

Answer: No, even an over-the-counter (non-prescription) medication other than described above must have an order by an authorized prescriber. Some examples of over-the-counter medications include calamine/caladryl lotion, Bacitracin ointment, Tylenol, and hydrocortisone cream.

Go figure.

16 posted on 05/21/2003 2:13:40 PM PDT by LurkedLongEnough (Ritualistic conformity = wasted minds.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Buffalo Bob
Its a damn good thing you dont take any life saving medication because with that attitude you would die rather than take any MEDS.
17 posted on 05/21/2003 2:15:59 PM PDT by cksharks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: LurkedLongEnough
bookmark
18 posted on 05/21/2003 2:27:28 PM PDT by IronJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ImaGraftedBranch
Well, they weren't very successful with vouchers, so I doubt it.
19 posted on 05/21/2003 2:29:57 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: cksharks
That has nothing to do with anything she just said.
20 posted on 05/21/2003 2:30:32 PM PDT by mabelkitty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson