[cake_crumb]

"You are in agreement, why are you jumping all over each other?"

We're not. We're having a possible difference of opinion on whether domestic dogs evolving from wolves has anything to do with the mistaken premise that humans evolved from chimps.

These threads where the creationists jump all over so-called evolutionists and accusing us of all being socialists are really confusing.

In fact, I think I probably shouldn't have jumped HOD. Sorry HOD if that was a ping to an argument with a creationist. I interpreted it as a flame for my dread of what the environazis will attempt to do with it...politics and science mixing. If it was a ping to help argue with a rabid creationist...sorry.

I'm gonna go read a horror novel. They're the only thing that can brighten my mood.

[HairOfTheDog]

I'm gonna go read a horror novel. They're the only thing that can brighten my mood.

ROTFL!

[Hodar]

I think we agree with the fossil record taking a front seat to pure emotionalism. In fact, I appologize if my posts sounded hostile. I was at work, and have to squeeze my posts between the 'boss patrol'. No hostility towards you was intended.

But, I'm not certain about the primate and human evolutionary path agrees with what you are putting forth. We have a pretty clear picture of how primates diverged and evolved into modern day man (re: Dumb and Dummer 2 poster). And genetically, it is becoming clearer, as it looks like man did evolve from primates. I think a lot of people object to the facts, because it somehow conflicts with their interpretation of the bible. If mankind was a process, rather than a project; it all makes sense.