Posted on 05/19/2003 6:01:32 AM PDT by SJackson
I remember the topic of this thread perfectly.
The United Way in Miami is cutting the funding to the BSA.
I guess what yo are saying here is that the United Way is wholly owned and operated by homosexuals?
What's interesting is that instead of commenting on the actions of the United Way, you would rather get your rocks off using words like "queer" and "pervert". I guess I must have stumbled on to the Junior High School version of FreeRepublic.com
As long as you have finally decided to address the actual topic of this thread, what do you have to say about the United Way's Miami Division's decision?
All of them. What should they do?
What people of faith should do is teach faith to their kids.
And vote.
So you favor censoring them from speaking in the public square? You favor censoring them from trying to teach others about what is true and what is not because their knowledge of truth comes from their faith? Isn't that kind-of anti-first ammendment?
Also, you never answered my other question. Are you making a distinction between religious morality and non-religious morality?
Shalom.
The fact is that people do engage in them. If you find the acts themselves disgusting, would you not think those who engage in them are sick?
Shalom.
Once again, your "guess" is a silly strawman; the truth is more sinister.
Of course the United Gay is not wholly owned and operated by homosexuals. Rather, it is operated by ordinary people who are easily intimidated and cowed into submitting to the pro-sodomy agenda by a tiny minority of human beings who insist on defining their public core existence according a private sexual perversion. It is a microcosm what is happening in US culture in general.
This tiny minority of sexual perverts is forcing a rewrite of our laws to give them power to imprison and jail anyone who dares to call their perversion perversion (hate crime legislation; see e.g., Canada for the model). This tiny minority is trying to bully good youth organizations such as the Boy Scouts into placing young men at risk of the minority's sexual predations. This tiny minority, which has already hijacked the largest plurality of health-reserach dollars (extorted from the taxpayer) into paying for research into how to treat the minority's willfull and wonton transmission of deadly STDs including AIDS so the minority may continue to indulge with impunity in gross septic sexual practices more promiscuously than any lesser self-respecting creature in the animal kingdom.
And you stupidly defend this minority, Luis. You cheer their gaystapo tactics and you welcome the Gay New World they are forcing on the rest of us.
No Kevin, it's WAAAAAY simpler than that.
It's owned and operated by people who do not agree with your views on this subject. People who exercise their God-given, Constitutionally-guaranteed right to express their own opinions.
Not people who live in fear of Ninja Fags or Black Homocopters.
The dreaded Gay New World order!!
Gays finally saying that they've been here all along is going to destroy society!!
Why don't you wake up, smell the coffee, and place blame where blame belongs Kevin?
WE began the destruction of the moral fabric of America decades ago, we heterosexuals did it. We destroyed traditional American values Kevin, the "gay agenda" is a symptom of the disease we inflicted on society.
We did it with our Sexual Revolution, with our need for carefree, commitment free, consequence-free sex. Gay people simply want in on what we started!
We did it with our desire to find ways to destroy the constitution of marriage through no-fault divorce, the habit of cohabitating without being married, the popularity of swinging...so much more. You worry about the gay community destroying the sacrament of marriage, when in fact, by sheer power of numbers, they can't possibly harm it as much as we already have! Look around you, marriage isn't even thought to be a requirement to have children these days.
I defend the right of every single one of the citizens of this nation to speak their mind, and to ask the government for redress. I defend the right of every single citizen to challenge the status quo and to demand to be heard. You on the other hand, would rather have a segment of the population not heard, not seen, and for them not to exercise their constitutional rights based on how you feel about their lifestyle. I believe, like Ronald Reagan believed, in freedom.
"Freedom is the right to question and change the established way of doing things. It is the continuous revolution of the marketplace. It is the understanding that allows to recognize shortcomings and seek solutions."---Ronald Regan
It's the same question that you want the law to ask in the Paople's Courtrooms across the nation.
I'm making a disctintion on that which is Caesar's, and that which is God's.
Should have read:
"I'm making a disctintion between that which is Caesar's, and that which is God's."
I find circumcision to be a savage, unnecessary act of ritualistic violence that's perpetrated on infants by a less-than-sanitary Mohel during the bris ceremony.
But my kids are Jewish, so I dealt with it.
and that what remained would be used to defend unborn baby murderers businessmen,
and sodomists who fight for the right to molest our children.
You pretend you are unaware of NAMBLA.
You pretend you are unaware of 4,400 murders for cash daily performed on babies.
You keep up this smoke and mirrors rationalization while these child molesting and "in your face, God!" faggots and baby murderers continue on course, sticking to their game plans.
The belief that all men are created equal is enforced by our government (whether well or poorly is another debate). On what basis do we claim that all men are created equal?
Even simpler question for you, Luis (which you seem to hate to answer). Do you make a distinction between religious morality and non-religious morality?
Shalom.
Shalom.
Are you making a distinction between religious and non-religious morality?
Shalom.
A little melodramatic aren't you?
By the way, our forefathers whouldn't have a clue about what you are talking about there.
You should try using words that actually exist.
A sodomy entitlement.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.